https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-01a13b182f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-64de0b334e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6a8f0b2dcf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.el5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 5.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-80d9bf670b
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-539259c3b2
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-13f43f568d
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/clatd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #11 from Ingvar Hagelund ---
I said BSD. I meant MIT.
Ingvar
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #10 from Ingvar Hagelund ---
> > Release: 1.3.20160128git%{?shortcommit0}%{?dist}
>
> The "1.3" in release looks weird; you typically use only one digit unless the
> first one is a zero. E.g. "0.3." for a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar ---
(In reply to Lubomir Rintel from comment #8)
> Also, why are you packaging a snapshot instead of a released version?
>
> > %if 0%{?fedora} > 23
> > BuildRequires:perl-podlators
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel ---
* Named correctly
* Licensed correctly
* License text included
* SPEC file clean and legible
* Builds fine in mock
Looks generally good. There's some notes below -- some of them are just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #6 from Ingvar Hagelund ---
Thanks Lukáš and Petr. clatd now co-owns /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d, but
no longer requires initscripts.
https://ingvar.fedorapeople.org/tayga/clatd.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
Lukáš Nykrýn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(lnyk...@redhat.co |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lnyk...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #3 from Ingvar Hagelund ---
Hello, Petr
I require initscripts for /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d (in %install).
On my fedora 23 system:
$ rpm -qf /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #1 from Ingvar Hagelund ---
Upstream source and inforamtion: https://github.com/toreanderson/clatd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
32 matches
Mail list logo