[Bug 1367115] Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115 Gergely Polonkai changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1367115] Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags|

[Bug 1367115] Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115 Feng Yu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rainwood...@gmail.com

[Bug 1367115] Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115 --- Comment #8 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Yep, looks like an upgrade is needed. Probably some recent git snapshot would be good. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You

[Bug 1367115] Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115 --- Comment #7 from Gergely Polonkai --- Yes, upstream has been already upgraded to 0.32, and as F24 already has Vala 0.32, maybe I should also upgrade this package (as valadoc follows vala's version numbers, obviously)

[Bug 1367115] Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115 --- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- It seems to be a vala version problem. On F23: checking for valac... /usr/bin/valac checking whether /usr/bin/valac is at least version 0.15.1... yes checking for

[Bug 1367115] Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115 --- Comment #5 from Gergely Polonkai --- That's exactly the strange part, I had successful mock and koji builds. Still, I'm already looking into it, I hope I can provide a working package soon. -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1367115] Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115 --- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- The SRPM doesn't need to be rebuilt: the result is (except in some special cases) the same, no matter what the build host. The binary RPMs should be built on rawhide (in

[Bug 1367115] Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115 --- Comment #3 from Gergely Polonkai --- It's a bit strange, as the files are the same as in the old ticket… I will take a look into it and get back with the results. Also, should I build on Fedora 24 now it is out? The

[Bug 1367115] Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115 --- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Created attachment 1191731 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1191731=edit log from failed build in fedora-rawhide-x86_64 mock I tried to build the

[Bug 1367115] Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug 1367115] Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115 Bug 1367115 depends on bug 988667, which changed state. Bug 988667 Summary: Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988667 What|Removed

[Bug 1367115] Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115 --- Comment #1 from Gergely Polonkai --- *** Bug 988667 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes