[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

2016-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- obs-build-20161025-231.1.1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

2016-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- obs-build-20161025-231.1.1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

2016-11-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

2016-11-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661 Jon Disnard changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA

[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

2016-11-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

2016-10-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- obs-build-20161025-231.1.1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

2016-10-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- obs-build-20161025-231.1.1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

2016-10-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA

[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

2016-10-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/obs-build -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

2016-10-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+

[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

2016-10-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661 --- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa --- I've revised the spec with an updated license tag, and included a patch to apply the clarifications to the package. Spec URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/obs-build.spec

[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

2016-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661 --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý --- > I do intend to try to package the rest of OBS, and I've seen Josef's thesis > before. I've addressed the Net::RabbitMQ issue before OBS 2.7 was > released[1], so that unblocks the

[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

2016-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661 --- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa --- (In reply to Miroslav Suchý from comment #1) > If you intend to package rest of OBS you may check chapter 5 from > http://is.muni.cz/th/325243/fi_m/thesis.pdf I do intend to try to

[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

2016-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661 --- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa --- I got the license tags from the SUSE spec[1] and translated it to our short tags. Since SUSE is the upstream and they have a spec, I trust that the tag information is correct. [1]:

[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

2016-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661 --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchý --- Package looks good. My only concern is license. License check say it that everythin is just GPL and only GPL (v2) are: obs-build-20160809/build-pkg

[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

2016-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED