https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
obs-build-20161025-231.1.1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
obs-build-20161025-231.1.1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
Jon Disnard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
obs-build-20161025-231.1.1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
obs-build-20161025-231.1.1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/obs-build
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
I've revised the spec with an updated license tag, and included a patch to
apply the clarifications to the package.
Spec URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/obs-build.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý ---
> I do intend to try to package the rest of OBS, and I've seen Josef's thesis
> before. I've addressed the Net::RabbitMQ issue before OBS 2.7 was
> released[1], so that unblocks the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Miroslav Suchý from comment #1)
> If you intend to package rest of OBS you may check chapter 5 from
> http://is.muni.cz/th/325243/fi_m/thesis.pdf
I do intend to try to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
I got the license tags from the SUSE spec[1] and translated it to our short
tags. Since SUSE is the upstream and they have a spec, I trust that the tag
information is correct.
[1]:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchý ---
Package looks good.
My only concern is license.
License check say it that everythin is just GPL and only GPL (v2) are:
obs-build-20160809/build-pkg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
16 matches
Mail list logo