https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432076
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
urh-1.6.6-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432076
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432076
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
urh-1.6.6-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432076
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432076
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
urh-1.6.6-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2df06489c5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432076
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432076
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/urh
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432076
Arthur Mello changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432076
--- Comment #6 from Arthur Mello ---
Thx for addressing the comments.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
= MUST items =
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432076
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(pcah...@redhat.co |fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432076
--- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Arthur Mello from comment #3)
Thanks for the review.
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432076
--- Comment #3 from Arthur Mello ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: urh :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432076
Arthur Mello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ame...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432076
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432076
Pavel Cahyna changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
15 matches
Mail list logo