https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
--- Comment #14 from Tomas Orsava ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #13)
> > One RPM/subpackage can contain only Python 2 or Python 3 compiled files,
> > not both at the same time. There was a discussion about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
--- Comment #12 from Tomas Orsava ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #10)
> * Why subpackage is named as python3-? It doesn't make any sense for me.
One RPM/subpackage can contain only Python 2 or Python 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
--- Comment #11 from Igor Gnatenko ---
Apart from few notes above, I have nothing to complain about.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
--- Comment #10 from Igor Gnatenko ---
* Why subpackage is named as python3-? It doesn't make any sense for me.
* What about adding Conflicts for different versions of RPM? This will make
sure that we update it along
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
--- Comment #9 from Tomas Orsava ---
I've did a small update of the specfile and SRPMs:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
Tomas Orsava changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
--- Comment #8 from Tomas Orsava ---
=== I'm taking over this package request ===
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
Tomas Orsava changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tors...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
--- Comment #6 from Petr Šabata ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #5)
> (In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #3)
> > > For what it's worth, this is an awful idea, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #4)
> (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #3)
> > For what it's worth, this is an awful idea, but since the Modularity guys
> > clearly can't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
--- Comment #4 from Petr Šabata ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #3)
> For what it's worth, this is an awful idea, but since the Modularity guys
> clearly can't separate base runtime from build root, I guess we're
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||psab...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
Michal Cyprian changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
16 matches
Mail list logo