[Bug 1450122] Review Request: qt5-qtmidi - Qt 5 Multimedia Library

2017-09-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450122 --- Comment #6 from greg.helli...@gmail.com --- OK, I've renamed the main specfile and SRPM to qtmidi. I've also tried to eliminate the cruft from the metadata and the build process, where possible. I'm generating out qt5-qtmidi binary

[Bug 1450122] Review Request: qt5-qtmidi - Qt 5 Multimedia Library

2017-08-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450122 greg.helli...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(greg.hellings@gma | |il.com)

[Bug 1450122] Review Request: qt5-qtmidi - Qt 5 Multimedia Library

2017-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450122 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1450122] Review Request: qt5-qtmidi - Qt 5 Multimedia Library

2017-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450122 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt --- There is absolutely no reason for the src.rpm %name to be qt5-qtmidi instead of qtmidi. Upstream name is "qtmidi", and that ought to be the %name for this package. The naming

[Bug 1450122] Review Request: qt5-qtmidi - Qt 5 Multimedia Library

2017-07-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450122 --- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner --- Isn't that guideline in conflict with how we commonly do it for qt5 addons to use -qt5 as a suffix instead?

[Bug 1450122] Review Request: qt5-qtmidi - Qt 5 Multimedia Library

2017-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450122 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@gmail.com

[Bug 1450122] Review Request: qt5-qtmidi - Qt 5 Multimedia Library

2017-06-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450122 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC|