https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #90 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #89)
> Hi , thanks for the reply , another question, can we use new vboxsf source
> [1] in el7 ?
>
> i.e. instead use new vboxsf source [1] code only in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #89 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #88)
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your work on maintaining the vbox guest-additions package in
> Fedora.
>
> (In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #88 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi,
Thank you for your work on maintaining the vbox guest-additions package in
Fedora.
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #86)
> BTW please review
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #87 from xno...@gmail.com ---
The pwritev hang/loop/corruption issue with shared folders still exists in
linux 4.20.3 with virtualbox 6.0.2 (virtualbox-guest-modules-arch,
virtualbox-guest-utils-nox).
Since this bug has been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #86 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
BTW please review
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/virtualbox-guest-additions/blob/master/f/010-linux-4.16-mount-fixes.patch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #85 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to xnoreq from comment #84)
> >Sorry, not yet. But I've been making good progress on the rest of my TODO
> >list, so I hope to get around to this soon.
>
> Over half a year later, has this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
xno...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xno...@gmail.com
--- Comment #84
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #83 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi,
(In reply to Evangelos Foutras from comment #82)
> Did you get a chance to look at the pwritev issue?
Sorry, not yet. But I've been making good progress on the rest of my TODO list,
so I hope to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #82 from Evangelos Foutras ---
Hi Hans,
Did you get a chance to look at the pwritev issue?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #81 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi,
(In reply to Evangelos Foutras from comment #80)
> (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #65)
> > If you want to test this with vboxsf, here is a standalone version of vboxsf
> > which will build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #80 from Evangelos Foutras ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #65)
> If you want to test this with vboxsf, here is a standalone version of vboxsf
> which will build against the vboxguest included in the 4.16-rc1+ kernels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #79 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
(In reply to Evangelos Foutras from comment #76)
> @Hans Do you know if the upstream fix for VBoxServiceAutoMount and
> vboxsf.mount will support both pre-4.16 and current
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #78 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #69)
> I will make sure that the vboxguest driver gets disabled for F27 kernel
> builds.
Hello
I did the quick fix in VirtualBox-kmod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #77 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Evangelos Foutras from comment #76)
> @Hans Do you know if the upstream fix for VBoxServiceAutoMount and
> vboxsf.mount will support both pre-4.16 and current kernels?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Evangelos Foutras changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #75 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
FYI https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4880
I think there is a miss-understanding that any work is needed on the rpmfusion
side. It shouldn't have been.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #74 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
Also I don't get why the guest-additions is kept in the rpmfusion counterpart.
we shouldn't replace any fedora package, so if the fedora package replace the
rpmfusion one ,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #73 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #72)
> Hi,
From fedora virtualbox-guest-additions
>Provides: VirtualBox-kmod-common = %{version}-%{release}
I think we said
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #72 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi,
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #71)
> Hello ,
>
> Would be an honor if you give commit access to this package, I could do the
> builds and updates of this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #71 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
Hello ,
Would be an honor if you give commit access to this package, I could do the
builds and updates of this package.
I miss one word in my previous comment (*) please
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #70 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
While I read this new information ,
Hans please can you merge my PR [1] and virtualbox-guest-additions for F28 ,
thanks
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #69 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi,
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #68)
> Hello ,
>
> (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #55)
> > (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #54)
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Sergio Monteiro Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #67 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi,
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #66)
> (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #64)
> > (In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #63)
> > > But , shared
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #66 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #64)
> (In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #63)
> > But , shared folder will work ?
>
> See comment 58.
I do not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #64 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #63)
> But , shared folder will work ?
See comment 58.
> but this will be ready for 4.16-rc1 ? i.e. or we will still need vboxsf.ko
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #63 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #62)
> (In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #60)
> > (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #51)
> > > - Latest rpmfusion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #62 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #60)
> (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #51)
> > - Latest rpmfusion Release is 2, set our Release field to 3
>
> Maybe could
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #61 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #51)
> - Use pkgconfig to get include/libs instead of hardcoding (rhbz#1534595)
we can't use pkgconf, for example:
pkgconf --cflags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #60 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #51)
> - Latest rpmfusion Release is 2, set our Release field to 3
Maybe could be better bump Epoch, for example VirtualBox had a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #59 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/virtualbox-guest-additions
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #58 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #57)
> +# Mainline vboxsf uses an option string rather then a custom binary data
> struct
> +Patch2:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #57 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
Hi ,
comment diff between specs 5.2.2 and 5.2.6
1 -
+# Small compile fix
Patch1: VirtualBox-5.0.18-xserver_guest.patch
yeah something happened and upstream doesn't do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #55 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #54)
> There is nothing holding review maybe except that the 4.16-rc1 kernel lands
> (or maybe even before rc1). Does it have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #54 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
There is nothing holding review maybe exept that the 4.16-rc1 kernel lands (or
maybe even before rc1). Does it have everything needed ?
I plan to do some runtime tests once
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #53 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #52)
> @Hans,
>
> The spec file doesn't include this new change. Can you please upload it?
It is already there, but I messed up the link (Caps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #52 from Neal Gompa ---
@Hans,
The spec file doesn't include this new change. Can you please upload it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #50 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #33)
> kmk need this [1] all least in my case ...
>
> [1]
> +VBOX_PATH_APP_PRIVATE=%{_libdir}/virtualbox \
> +
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1534595
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #49 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #38)
> Here is a new version of the pkg, updated to 5.2.2:
>
> SPEC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #48 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #40)
> (In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #39)
> > Did you see this thread [1]
>
> Weird, Vic writes: "Some apps like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #47 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
Yep I would appreciate a lower case package name also. I find hard to remember
one or another package name often, so not to take the case into account. Using
lower case all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #46 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
I agree that VirtualBox-guest-additions must be provided either way. But I
think the lowercase name is much more in agreement with current style and the
guidelines. It
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #45 from Neal Gompa ---
> Package name should be virtualbox-guest-additions.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming#General_Naming says "Package
> names should be in lower case" and that's the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #43 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #41)
> * Keep from using requires on kernel from userspace. Most of the time this
> is invalid (you could be within a chroot ,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #42 from Hans de Goede ---
Good news, the vboxguest kernel module patches have been merged into
char-misc-next. If all goes well and they do not get reverted in a couple of
days I will add them to the rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #41 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #38)
> Here is a new version of the pkg, updated to 5.2.2:
>
> SPEC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #40 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #39)
> Did you see this thread [1]
Weird, Vic writes: "Some apps like atril and emacs are failing because
VBoxOGLcrutil.so can't be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #39 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
Hi Hans,
Did you see this thread [1] I replied please "run app with VBoxOGLRun.sh or
export
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/VBoxGuestAdditions:/usr/lib/VBoxGuestAdditions"
which
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #38 from Hans de Goede ---
Here is a new version of the pkg, updated to 5.2.2:
SPEC: https://fedorapeople.org/~jwrdegoede/VirtualBox-guest-additions.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(hdegoede@redhat.c |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #35 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #33)
> > With this fix, the ldconfig calls can be moved from the %post scripts,
>
> hum , I have to check this , I could run
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #34 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
I was comment https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4617#c9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #33 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #9)
> Hi,
>
> So I've just finished packaging the vbox guest-additions for Fedora proper:
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(hdegoede@redhat.c |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(hdegoede@redhat.c |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #28 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #27)
> @Hans, I'm reviewing VirtualBox packages , to adjust guest 3D passthru, and
> I have some questions .
> 1 - you do not add
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #27 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
@Hans, I'm reviewing VirtualBox packages , to adjust guest 3D passthru, and I
have some questions .
1 - you do not add /usr/lib64/VBoxEGL.so to package ?
2- Reading
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(hdegoede@redhat.c |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #24 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #20)
> Hi,
>
> I got a headsup from upstream last Wednesday that the new stable ioctl
> interface is in place. They did more changes to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #23 from Johnny Robeson ---
ah sorry for that d there. I just meant to CC.
Can there be a subpackage just for the non gui related bits like the shared
mounting ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(hdegoede@redhat.c |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Johnny Robeson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #20 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi,
I got a headsup from upstream last Wednesday that the new stable ioctl
interface is in place. They did more changes to the ioctl interface then I
expected. So now I'm adjusting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #19 from Neal Gompa ---
Hans,
What progress has been made on the drivers?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #18 from Neal Gompa ---
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #17 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi Neal,
Thank you for the review and I understand. 2 weeks ago Virtual Box upstream let
me know that they want to do some cleanups on the vboxguest character device
ioctl API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hdego...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #15 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #11)
> (In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #7)
> > Hi,
> > After tweak fedora-review [1] I needed 2 patches [2] , I see one
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #14 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #13)
> > BuildRequires: kBuild >= 0.1.9998
> > BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils makeself yasm
> > BuildRequires: boost-devel
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #13 from Neal Gompa ---
> BuildRequires: kBuild >= 0.1.9998
> BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils makeself yasm
> BuildRequires: boost-devel
> BuildRequires: libXcomposite-devel libXmu-devel libXrandr-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #11 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #7)
> Hi,
> After tweak fedora-review [1] I needed 2 patches [2] , I see one issue , the
> provides of libGL.so.1()(64bit) [3] can we
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #12 from Hans de Goede ---
Here is a new version:
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~jwrdegoede/VirtualBox-guest-additions.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #10 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi,
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #9)
> IIRC, you need something like this: (taken from libglvnd).
>
> %global __provides_exclude_from %{_libdir}/%{name}
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #8 from Neal Gompa ---
I'm working on setting up a test environment for this, per Hans' comment in
comment 3.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #7 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
Hi,
After tweak fedora-review [1] I needed 2 patches [2] , I see one issue , the
provides of libGL.so.1()(64bit) [3] can we remove this rpm provides ?
Regards.
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #6 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
Neal Gompa, please review it , thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #4)
> Hello , I'm thinking what should write , of course I will do the review ASAP
> ( today evening or so, next weekend at most )
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Sergio Monteiro Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi Neal,
Please note that the guest kernel modules are not yet in place in the Fedora
kernel (I'm working on this) still it would be good to get this review done, so
that this can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
c72...@yahoo.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c72...@yahoo.de
--- Comment #1 from
92 matches
Mail list logo