https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System ---
mupen64plus-2.5-7.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-cd2b884759 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #36 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #34 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #33 from Wade Berrier ---
I made some progress on this:
* adapted upstream patch to fix the build (thanks for finding those) and pushed
to the repository
* requested branches for f32 and f31
* added dreua to users list as admin
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #32 from David Auer ---
On the linking issue:
Thanks Paul, I didn't find this yesterday. I absolutely agree that this is the
way to go. (i.e. apply this patch downstream until it is released and disregard
my linker workaround)
O
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
--- Comment #31 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #30 from David Auer ---
Sorry forgotten: My fas is "dreua"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #29 from David Auer ---
We can instruct ld to allow multiple definitions, then the build works, but
should we?
Builds, not tested:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/dreua/rpms/mupen64plus/c/046ba6166ed6e25d084043e12b157e9f13350c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
Wade Berrier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(wberr...@gmail.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
David Auer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(wberr...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #26 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mupen64plus
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #25
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #24 from Wade Berrier ---
Sounds good. I ran the `request-repo` command but it responded with:
Could not execute request_repo: The Bugzilla bug is not approved yet
I guess that's what you mean about the review flag.
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #23 from David Auer ---
Dang, I tried to reset the review flag but I can't, now you have to wait
Robert-André fixes that. Sorry but I think it was outdated anyway.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
David Auer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--- Comment #22 from Davi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #21 from Wade Berrier ---
What's the next step to get this accepted?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Flags|fedora-revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #18 from Wade Berrier ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #17)
> (In reply to Wade Berrier from comment #16)
> > No, I don't think I was.
>
> Sent you a mail regarding that.
I responded with an email with the spons
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #17 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Wade Berrier from comment #16)
> No, I don't think I was.
Sent you a mail regarding that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
Wade Berrier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(wberr...@gmail.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
Geoffrey Marr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gm...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #14 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Wade Berrier from comment #13)
> I guess I need a sponsor?
>
> My pagure.io requests were closed.
Yes you need a sponsor:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #13 from Wade Berrier ---
I guess I need a sponsor?
My pagure.io requests were closed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #12 from Wade Berrier ---
Upstream notified about the incorrect addresses in the license files:
https://github.com/mupen64plus/mupen64plus-core/issues/527
Git repo requests:
f27:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/iss
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #10 from Wade Berrier ---
Ok, I've made the additional changes and posted them here:
http://berrier.org/tmp/mupen64plus.spec
http://berrier.org/tmp/mupen64plus-2.5-4.fc27.src.rpm
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #6)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|anto.tra...@gma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Ah I got it! I noticed there is a debug option in the Makefile:
Debugging Options:"
@echo "PROFILE=1 == build gprof instrumentation into binaries for
profiling"
@echo "DEBUG=
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
>Question: I changed "%define debug_package" to use "global", is that correct?
Yes
>What do I need to do about a debuginfo package?
Indeed, the best would be to generate the debug infos but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
You shouldn't patch the FSF address in the LICENSES files. It is allowed when
it's just in the headers of a source file, but not for license files. See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #5 from Wade Berrier ---
Robert-André, thanks for the comprehensive review.
I believe I've made all of the requested changes, and have new updates here:
Spec URL: http://berrier.org/tmp/mupen64plus.spec
SRPM URL: http://berrier.o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
As you wish Antonio.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--- Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
39 matches
Mail list logo
