[Bug 1557661] Review Request: python-astropy-healpix - HEALPix for Astropy

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557661

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2018-03-30 09:08:36



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-astropy-3.0.1-1.fc28, python-astropy-healpix-0.2-1.fc28,
python-pytest-arraydiff-0.2-1.fc28, python-pytest-astropy-0.2.1-1.fc28,
python-pytest-doctestplus-0.1.2-1.fc28, python-pytest-openfiles-0.2.0-1.fc28,
python-pytest-remotedata-0.2.0-1.fc28, python2-astropy-2.0.5-2.fc28 has been
pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1557661] Review Request: python-astropy-healpix - HEALPix for Astropy

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557661

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-astropy-3.0.1-1.fc28, python-astropy-healpix-0.2-1.fc28,
python-pytest-arraydiff-0.2-1.fc28, python-pytest-astropy-0.2.1-1.fc28,
python-pytest-doctestplus-0.1.2-1.fc28, python-pytest-openfiles-0.2.0-1.fc28,
python-pytest-remotedata-0.2.0-1.fc28, python2-astropy-2.0.5-2.fc28 has been
pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0ebae6c186

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1557661] Review Request: python-astropy-healpix - HEALPix for Astropy

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557661



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pytest-arraydiff-0.2-1.fc28 python-pytest-openfiles-0.2.0-1.fc28
python-pytest-remotedata-0.2.0-1.fc28 python-pytest-doctestplus-0.1.2-1.fc28
python-pytest-astropy-0.2.1-1.fc28 python-astropy-healpix-0.2-1.fc28
python2-astropy-2.0.5-2.fc28 python-astropy-3.0.1-1.fc28 has been submitted as
an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0ebae6c186

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1557661] Review Request: python-astropy-healpix - HEALPix for Astropy

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557661

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1557661] Review Request: python-astropy-healpix - HEALPix for Astropy

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557661



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-astropy-healpix

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1557661] Review Request: python-astropy-healpix - HEALPix for Astropy

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557661

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package accepted.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)",
 "BSD (unspecified)", "PSF (v2)", "*No copyright* BSD (unspecified)",
 "BSD (3 clause)". 135 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-astropy-healpix
 /review-python-astropy-healpix/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
 Note: Macros in: python3-astropy-healpix (description)
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary 

[Bug 1557661] Review Request: python-astropy-healpix - HEALPix for Astropy

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557661

Christian Dersch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||115 (Astronomy-SIG)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=115
[Bug 115] Astronomy SIG - review tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org