https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583026
--- Comment #4 from vishalvvr ---
SPEC URL :
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/vishalvvr/ektype-mukta-fonts/fedora-29-x86_64/00798825-ektype-mukta-fonts/ektype-mukta-fonts.spec
SRPM URL :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583026
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583026
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Suggestions:
1) Always install font metainfo file from respective subpackage and not from
-common package. -common subpackage should be used only for common files like
documentation, license to all the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583026
--- Comment #2 from vishalvvr ---
SPEC URL :
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/vishalvvr/mukta-fonts/fedora-28-x86_64/00766514-mukta-fonts/mukta-fonts.spec
SRPM URL :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583026
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Please improve this packaging similar like we did in shobhika-fonts package
review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583026
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583026
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED