https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |NOTABUG
--- Comment #28 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NOTABUG |NEXTRELEASE
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
Georg Sauthoff changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NOTABUG |NEXTRELEASE
--- Comment #27 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|ERRATA |NOTABUG
--- Comment #26 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
python-asyncssh-1.13.3-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
python-asyncssh-1.13.3-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #22 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
python-asyncssh-1.13.3-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-445825fdc3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
python-asyncssh-1.13.3-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5b5c69e114
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #19 from Georg Sauthoff ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #18)
> > %{python3_sitelib}/*
>
> Don't use this.
Ok, I don't have to use it. I just got the idea from the Fedora Packaging
Guidelines for Python (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #17 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-asyncssh
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #16 from Georg Sauthoff ---
Good catch, I've updated the sed command.
Current spec:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gsauthof/copr-fedora/f6d0f57d11a31817512b12d3a5c68d8d2adb0bea/python-asyncssh/python-asyncssh.spec
COPR:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #14 from Georg Sauthoff ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #7)
> Thanks for this review and the package. I can approve this request on trust
> in the result from original reviewer.
Do you mind setting the fedora-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #13 from Georg Sauthoff ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #10)
> Well, the authors try to get compatible with GPL. Maybe ask upstream to
> upgrade.
> https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/faq.php#h.60mjudroo8e5
FWIW,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #12 from Raphael Groner ---
License upgrade requested: https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh/issues/161
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #10)
> Well, the authors try to get compatible with GPL. Maybe ask upstream to
> upgrade.
> https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/faq.php#h.60mjudroo8e5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|projects...@smart.ms
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #10 from Raphael Groner ---
Well, the authors try to get compatible with GPL. Maybe ask upstream to
upgrade.
https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/faq.php#h.60mjudroo8e5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #9 from Georg Sauthoff ---
(In reply to Georg Sauthoff from comment #8)
> The asyncssh author explicitly chose the EPL for it's weak copyleft features
> (cf. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/asyncssh-users/lS8FlyxSVEo/iDsuUH9or-EJ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #8 from Georg Sauthoff ---
The asyncssh author explicitly chose the EPL for it's weak copyleft features
(cf. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/asyncssh-users/lS8FlyxSVEo/iDsuUH9or-EJ ).
When the first code was released in 2013, EPL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #6 from Iñaki Ucar ---
Thanks, Georg. It looks good to me, but I cannot assign this to myself, because
I still need a sponsor. I attach below the revised version of the output of
the fedora-review tool as a reference for another
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #5 from Georg Sauthoff ---
Yes, it makes sense to suggest/recommend the optional packages. I added the
optional packages as weak dependencies (one recommends and the rest as
suggests).
Regarding EPL-1.0 - yes, it's a false
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #4 from Iñaki Ucar ---
Oh, also:
- You may consider reusing the global srcname, instead of repeating "asyncssh".
- You may consider using %{py3_dist} to list dependencies.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
--- Comment #3 from Iñaki Ucar ---
This is an informal review. Some comments:
- Shouldn't be the optional packages suggested?
- EPL-1.0 is reported as an invalid license by rpmlint, but I'm not sure
whether this could be a false positive,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
Georg Sauthoff changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(fed...@georg.so) |
--- Comment #2 from Georg Sauthoff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611828
Iñaki Ucar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@georg.so,
|
31 matches
Mail list logo
