https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645765
Till Hofmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) |
Resolution|NOTABUG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645765
Till Hofmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645765
--- Comment #5 from Till Hofmann ---
Can we get the package wrapped up?
I reconsidered my comment about the licensing, apparently this is handled
differently for MIT-licensed projects, MIT doesn't have the requirement that
the license is ment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645765
--- Comment #4 from Till Hofmann ---
(In reply to Jan Pokorný from comment #3)
> Sorry for my blindness to "issues" section, was concentrating merely
> on the checkboxes since my brain was learnt that there's usually a lot
> of ballast coming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645765
--- Comment #3 from Jan Pokorný ---
Sorry for my blindness to "issues" section, was concentrating merely
on the checkboxes since my brain was learnt that there's usually a lot
of ballast coming from fedora-review (meaning it likely needs some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645765
--- Comment #2 from Jan Pokorný ---
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~jpokorny/pkgs/slurp/slurp.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~jpokorny/pkgs/slurp/slurp-0.0.1-2.20181024git0dbd039.fc30.src.rpm
Koji build: https://koji.fedoraprojec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645765
--- Comment #1 from Till Hofmann ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- The file protocol/wlr-layer-shell-unstable-v1.xml is l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645765
Till Hofmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645765
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
