[Bug 1802803] Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 Omair Majid changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1802803] Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 --- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dotnet3.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about

[Bug 1802803] Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 --- Comment #9 from Omair Majid --- (In reply to Michael Cronenworth from comment #8) > As this is a compiler and not a 'runtime' package as the name implies I > don't have reservations any more. If it is safe to drop the .a and .h files > the

[Bug 1802803] Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 Michael Cronenworth changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 f

[Bug 1802803] Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 Tom Deseyn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tdes...@redhat.com --- Comment #7 from T

[Bug 1802803] Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 --- Comment #6 from Omair Majid --- (In reply to Michael Cronenworth from comment #5) > Looks like they are leaning to remove static libs. > > Would a C header and a static library be necessary to build a C# app? As far as I can tell, the C

[Bug 1802803] Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 --- Comment #5 from Michael Cronenworth --- (In reply to Omair Majid from comment #4) > %files -n dotnet-host > %dir %{_libdir}/dotnet > > And dotnet-host needs to be installed for any other subpackage in this > package to be installed. Can y

[Bug 1802803] Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 --- Comment #4 from Omair Majid --- (In reply to Michael Cronenworth from comment #3) > I've performed an initial review and found the following issues. Thanks! > - /usr/lib64/dotnet is not owned. This package should own it if the package >

[Bug 1802803] Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 --- Comment #3 from Michael Cronenworth --- I've performed an initial review and found the following issues. - /usr/lib64/dotnet is not owned. This package should own it if the package 'dotnet-build-reference-packages' is not required. If 'do

[Bug 1802803] Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 Radka Janek changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1803942 Referenced Bugs: https://bugz

[Bug 1802803] Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 --- Comment #2 from Omair Majid --- Sorry about that. I think I hit the disk quota and the server silently truncated the file. Here's a link that should work: https://spideroak.com/share/N5WWC2TJMQ/fedora/home/omajid/dotnet3.1/dotnet3.1.spec

[Bug 1802803] Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 Michael Cronenworth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob..

[Bug 1802803] Review Request: dotnet3.1 - .NET Core Runtime and SDK

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 Omair Majid changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1802785 Referenced Bugs: https://bugz