[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language

2020-07-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 cli...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language

2020-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 --- Comment #15 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/preproc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about

[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language

2020-03-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 --- Comment #14 from chedi toueiti --- @Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek Thanks for the guiding, I'm quite new to the review process -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about

[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language

2020-03-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC|

[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language

2020-03-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 chedi toueiti changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|chedi.toue...@gmail.com

[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language

2020-03-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zebo...@gmail.com --- Comment

[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language

2020-03-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 --- Comment #11 from cli...@gmail.com --- @chedi If you can take this review as well https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810902 I will gladly take review of your second package (python-git-url-parse). -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language

2020-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 --- Comment #10 from cli...@gmail.com --- @chedi Great! Thank you very much. I have another package for review but still working on it so maybe I will take your second package as well but we will see. Thanks so far! -- You are receiving

[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language

2020-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 --- Comment #9 from chedi toueiti --- @clime7 Thanks for taking a look at it, as for this package everything seems ok to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes

[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language

2020-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 --- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok --- > Is it ok to provide python2 script for epel7? Totally OK. I was just curious. Sorry about the noise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified

[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language

2020-03-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 cli...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are

[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language

2020-03-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 --- Comment #7 from cli...@gmail.com --- @Miro Hroncok Is it ok to provide python2 script for epel7? If so, I would keep it like this because then the package doesn't require installation of python3 into minimal rhel7/centos7 environments.

[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language

2020-03-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 --- Comment #6 from cli...@gmail.com --- @chedi toueiti I took review of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807945 Is this package (preproc) approved by you? I didn't see any particular issues according to the review you provided.

[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language

2020-03-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 --- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok --- If "default python" means /usr/bin/python than yes. Other than that, both versions are available in RHEL 7 and python3-pyparsing is in EPEL 7 (however I don't see that one in EPEL 6). -- You are

[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language

2020-03-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 --- Comment #4 from cli...@gmail.com --- I still have epel7 rather associated with python2. I believe that's the default python there still (at least in a container). I believe for rhel8/epel8 I am enabling python3. -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language

2020-03-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mhron...@redhat.com --- Comment #3

[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language

2020-03-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 --- Comment #2 from chedi toueiti --- If you have some time please check the folowing packages review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807945 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808023 -- You are receiving

[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language

2020-03-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 chedi toueiti changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chedi.toue...@gmail.com Doc