[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2023-07-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
Bug 1822847 depends on bug 2132574, which changed state.

Bug 2132574 Summary: Fedora-review fails to install metapackages with local 
dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132574

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2022-10-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847

Akira TAGOH  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(ta...@redhat.com) |




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2022-10-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
Bug 1822847 depends on bug 2132574, which changed state.

Bug 2132574 Summary: Fedora-review fails to install metapackages with local 
dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132574

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ASSIGNED
 Resolution|CANTFIX |---




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2022-10-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847

Benson Muite  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(ta...@redhat.com)



--- Comment #20 from Benson Muite  ---
Review of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122022 would be
appreciated if time allows.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2022-10-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847

Akira TAGOH  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
 Status|POST|CLOSED
Last Closed||2022-10-12 08:30:12




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2022-10-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847



--- Comment #19 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vl-gothic-fonts


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2022-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
Bug 1822847 depends on bug 2132574, which changed state.

Bug 2132574 Summary: Mock fails to install metapackages with local dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132574

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CANTFIX




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2022-10-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847

Benson Muite  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2022-10-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847

Benson Muite  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #18 from Benson Muite  ---
It installs from
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fed500/vl-gothic-fonts/ so assume it is
a problem with mock not the packaging. Probably the extensive comments from the
template can be removed, but it is not essential. Package approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2022-10-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847

Akira TAGOH  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||2132574





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132574
[Bug 2132574] Weird installation errors
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2022-10-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847



--- Comment #17 from Akira TAGOH  ---
I'm not sure what the problem is. I see the same result but I can install them:
$ rpm -ivh --test 1822847-vl-gothic-fonts/results/vl-*noarch.rpm
Verifying...  # [100%]
Preparing...  # [100%]
$

And the weird thing is that they were ignoring vl-gothic-fonts package which
should be generated together:
INFO: installing package(s):
/builddir/vl-gothic-fonts-all-20220612-2.fc38.noarch.rpm
/builddir/vl-pgothic-fonts-20220612-2.fc38.noarch.rpm
ERROR: Command failed:
 # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/
--releasever 38 --setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local
--disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock install
/builddir/vl-gothic-fonts-all-20220612-2.fc38.noarch.rpm
/builddir/vl-pgothic-fonts-20220612-2.fc38.noarch.rpm

Thus that looks like a bug in fedora-review.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2022-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847



--- Comment #16 from Benson Muite  ---
Created attachment 1916268
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1916268=edit
rootlog obtained from fedora-review

Shows failed installations when using fedora-review


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2022-10-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847



--- Comment #15 from Benson Muite  ---
Checking logs.

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-Clause License". 8 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/FedoraPackaging/reviews/vl-gothic-fonts/1822847-vl-gothic-
 fonts/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
 must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 8 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
 publishes signatures.
 Note: gpgverify is not used.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

= EXTRA items =

Generic:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
 Note: Mock build failed
 See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
 guidelines/#_use_rpmlint
[x]: 

[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2022-10-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847



--- Comment #14 from Akira TAGOH  ---
(In reply to Benson Muite from comment #13)
> c) Consider naming the metapackage vl-gothic-fonts-all
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/FontsPolicy/
> #_assembling_different_family_font_packages_font_metapackages

I don't get it. what are you proposing?

> d) Example multipackage spec files:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/khmer-os-fonts/blob/rawhide/f/khmer-os-
> fonts.spec
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/culmus-fonts/blob/rawhide/f/culmus-fonts.
> spec
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/julietaula-montserrat-fonts/blob/rawhide/
> f/julietaula-montserrat-fonts.spec

same.

> e) Without the metapackage, there are no installation errors. With the
> metapackage, there is an installation
> error because the dependencies of the metapackage cannot be found.

What's the real error? it works for me though. please add the full logs if you
found any issues.

> e) Possible updates to spec file (probably still want to include
> metapackage):

> %global fontpkgname1 %{foundry}-gothic-regular-fonts

Why did you add "regular" in the package name? it is a style. not a part of the
family name. it is not a case for vl-gothic-fonts, but, if a font has
non-regular style fonts such as italic, are you going to sub-package it
separately? No, the intention here is to get same families installed together
and provide all variants in one package for better experience. that isn't what
our packaging guidelines says.

Only updated source URL.

Spec URL:
https://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/vl-gothic-fonts/vl-gothic-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
https://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/vl-gothic-fonts/vl-gothic-fonts-20220612-2.fc38.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2022-09-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847



--- Comment #13 from Benson Muite  ---
fedora-review seems to run for me now. Initial comments:
a) Can the sources be downloaded from
https://mirrors.gigenet.com/OSDN//vlgothic/77450/VLGothic-%
b) When running fedora-review, I get the following output "INFO: Install
command returned error code 30", the reason for this is unclear, but seems to
be an error related to installation
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/blob/main/mock/py/mockbuild/exception.py#L38
c) Consider naming the metapackage vl-gothic-fonts-all
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/FontsPolicy/#_assembling_different_family_font_packages_font_metapackages
d) Example multipackage spec files:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/khmer-os-fonts/blob/rawhide/f/khmer-os-fonts.spec
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/culmus-fonts/blob/rawhide/f/culmus-fonts.spec
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/julietaula-montserrat-fonts/blob/rawhide/f/julietaula-montserrat-fonts.spec
e) Without the metapackage, there are no installation errors. With the
metapackage, there is an installation
error because the dependencies of the metapackage cannot be found.
e) Possible updates to spec file (probably still want to include metapackage):
BuildArch:  noarch
Version: 20220612
Release: 1%{?dist}
License: mplus and BSD
URL: http://dicey.org/vlgothic

%global foundry   vl  
%global fontlicenses  LICENSE_J.mplus LICENSE_E.mplus LICENSE LICENSE.en
%global fontdocs  README README_J.mplus README.sazanami README_E.mplus
%global fontdocsex%{fontlicenses}

%global common_description %{expand:
VLGothic provides Japanese TrueType fonts from the Vine Linux project.
Most of the glyphs are taken from the M+ and Sazanami Gothic fonts,
but some have also been improved by the project.
}

%global fontfamily1  VL Gothic
%global fontsummary1 Japanese TrueType font
%global fontpkgheader1   %{expand:
Obsoletes:  vlgothic-fonts < %{version}-%{release}
Provides:   vl-gothic-regular-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
}
%global fontpkgname1 %{foundry}-gothic-regular-fonts
%global fonts1   VL-Gothic-Regular.ttf
%global fontconfs1   %{SOURCE11}
%global fontdescription1 %{expand:
%{common_description}

This package provides the monospace VLGothic font.
}

%global fontfamily2   VL PGothic
%global fontsummary2  Proportional Japanese TrueType font
%global fontpkgheader2%{expand:
Obsoletes:  vlgothic-p-fonts < %{version}-%{release}
Provides:   vl-pgothic-regular-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
}
%global fontpkgname2  %{foundry}-pgothic-regular-fonts
%global fonts2VL-PGothic-Regular.ttf
%global fontconfs2%{SOURCE12}
%global fontdescription2  %{expand:
%{common_description}

This package provides the VLGothic font with proportional glyphs for some
non-Japanese characters.
}

Source0: 
https://mirrors.gigenet.com/OSDN//vlgothic/77450/VLGothic-%{version}.tar.xz
Source11: 65-3-vl-gothic-regular-fonts.conf
Source12: 65-2-vl-pgothic-regular-fonts.conf

Name: vl-gothic-fonts   
Summary:  Japanese TrueType fonts
%description
%wordwrap -v common_description

%fontpkg -a

%prep
%autosetup -n VLGothic
iconv -f EUC-JP -t UTF-8 -o README.sazanami.tmp README.sazanami
rm README.sazanami
mv README.sazanami.tmp README.sazanami

%build
%fontbuild -a

%install
%fontinstall -a

%check
%fontcheck -a

%fontfiles -a

%changelog


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2022-09-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847



--- Comment #12 from Akira TAGOH  ---
Sorry I missed this. How did you run it?

That seems working fine if I do fedora-review -b 1822847.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2022-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847

Benson Muite  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||benson_mu...@emailplus.org



--- Comment #11 from Benson Muite  ---
When running fedora-review, get the following:

Installation errors
---
INFO: mock.py version 3.1 starting (python version = 3.10.6, NVR =
mock-3.1-1.fc
36)...
Start(bootstrap): init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish(bootstrap): init plugins
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
INFO: Signal handler active
Start: run
Start(bootstrap): chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled package manager cache
Start(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata
Finish(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
Mock Version: 3.1
INFO: Mock Version: 3.1
Finish(bootstrap): chroot init
Start: chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled package manager cache
Start: cleaning package manager metadata
Finish: cleaning package manager metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
Mock Version: 3.1
INFO: Mock Version: 3.1
Finish: chroot init
INFO: installing package(s):
/builddir/vl-pgothic-fonts-20220612-1.fc38.noarch.r
pm /builddir/vl-gothic-fonts-all-20220612-1.fc38.noarch.rpm
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M cfe323d52a7142cf973407c55fd15f1c -D
/var/lib/mo
ck/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock
--bind=/tmp
/mock-resolv.w_8ssvea:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100
--sete
nv=SHELL=/bin/bash
--setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/instal
lation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock
--setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbi
n --setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;\007"
--setenv=PS1= \s-\v\$  --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8
--resolv-conf
=off /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/
--rele
asever 38 --setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local
--disable
plugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock install
/builddir/vl-pgothic-fonts-
20220612-1.fc38.noarch.rpm
/builddir/vl-gothic-fonts-all-20220612-1.fc38.noarch.
rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2022-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847



--- Comment #10 from Akira TAGOH  ---
Spec URL:
https://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/vl-gothic-fonts/vl-gothic-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
https://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/vl-gothic-fonts/vl-gothic-fonts-20220612-1.fc38.src.rpm

Updated spec file.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2022-07-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847



--- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH  ---
Spec URL:
https://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/vl-gothic-fonts/vl-gothic-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
https://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/vl-gothic-fonts/vl-gothic-fonts-20220612-1.fc37.src.rpm

Updated spec file.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


needinfo canceled: [Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2021-08-30 Thread bugzilla


Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review

Package Review  has canceled Package
Review 's request for Nicolas Mailhot
's needinfo:
Bug 1822847: Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847



--- Comment #8 from Package Review  ---
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket.
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2020-07-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847

Akira TAGOH  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review+  |fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2020-07-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847



--- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH  ---
Sorry, my bad. while there was some trouble in macros, I missed opportunities
to get this package into the repo. I'm revisiting this again for Bug#1858617
and updating the spec and srpm. also confirmed it is buildable on rawhide now.

It doesn't make too much changes but would be appreciated if anyone can
re-review it. thanks.

Spec URL:
https://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/vl-gothic-fonts/vl-gothic-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
https://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/vl-gothic-fonts/vl-gothic-fonts-20200720-1.fc33.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2020-05-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847



--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot  ---
This review cycle does not reflect reality.

When the review is done as fedora-review+, the rest of the work  is
requester-side, not reviewer-side
When the review is done as fedora-review-, again the fixing work is
requester-side, not reviewer-side

Practically, unless the requester is available to act on the review result at
once, no reviewer is going to commit following the result of the review months
if not years later (yes some of those are *that* old).

Thus, the only state during which it is correct to assign stuff on the
reviewer, is when the reviewer has taken the review but not finished it yet
(fedora-review?). The rest of the time the only person that can make things
move forward is the requester.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2020-05-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847



--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar  ---
A review has a life cycle. When someone stars reviewing a package, he should
assign the bug to himself, change the status to assigned and set fedora-review
flag to "?". Once a package is approved, the bug report keeps assigned to the
reviewer and when the submitter builds the package, the submitter closed the
bug or attaches is it to a Bodhi updates so that the bug report gets closed.

Recently, a review status listing
 for updated to reflect and
enforce the review life cycle. So I'm going through a list of reviews in an
inconsistent state and correcting them. My change in the review was exactly one
of the corrections. Nothing particular against this package.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2020-05-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847



--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot  ---
Hi Petr,

Do you mean anything particular in changing the assignation of this issue, or
is it a side-effect of the tool you use to add yourself in CC?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2020-05-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||ppi...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nicolas.mail...@laposte.net




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2020-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847

Nicolas Mailhot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot  ---
Quick review:

1. obligatory rpmlint check:

vl-gothic-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US monospace ->
mono space, mono-space, aerospace
vl-gothic-fonts.noarch: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/vl-gothic-fonts/README.sazanami
vl-gothic-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US monospace -> mono
space, mono-space, aerospace
vl-gothic-fonts.src:29: W: macro-in-comment %{SOURCE3}
vl-gothic-fonts.src:47: W: macro-in-comment %{SOURCE4}
vl-gothic-fonts.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: %{name}-1331050.patch
vl-gothic-fonts.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch1: %{name}-p-1331050.patch
vl-gothic-fonts-all.noarch: W: no-documentation
vl-pgothic-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US monospace ->
mono space, mono-space, aerospace
vl-pgothic-fonts.noarch: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/vl-pgothic-fonts/README.sazanami

Please remove the commented lines and fix the readmes using %linuxtext or
another method. For the patch part, rpmlint is mistaken, do as you wish

2. font installation check:

$ fc-scan -f
"%{family[0]};%{style[0]};%{fullname[0]};%{width};%{weight};%{slant};%{fontversion};%{file}\n"
 /usr/share/fonts/vl*fonts  |sort -t ';' -k1,1d -k4,4n -k5,5n -k6,6n -k2,2d
-k7,7dr | uniq | column --separator ';' -t 
VL Gothic   regular  VL Gothic   100  80  0  138936 
/usr/share/fonts/vl-gothic-fonts/VL-Gothic-Regular.ttf
VL PGothic  regular  VL PGothic  100  80  0  138936 
/usr/share/fonts/vl-pgothic-fonts/VL-PGothic-Regular.ttf

The regular (minuscule) is certainly unusual and may trip some applications

3. spec comparison against official Fedora templates OK (lots of dead commented
lines that should be removed)

4. since we only ship OpenType font families nowadays, maybe it is not useful
to remind the font family format in Summary and description

5. You have some mixed tab/space indenting in the spec

Otherwise, looks good, thanks for the conversion

APPROVED


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2020-04-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847

Akira TAGOH  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproj
   ||ect.org



--- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH  ---
This is rename of vlgothic-fonts.

Re-review is needed for package renaming according to the new fonts packaging
guidelines.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org