https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6e4abc955e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6e4abc955e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6e4abc9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-def71cae41 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-def71ca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #31 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #30 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
Gwyn Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(gwync@protonmail. |
|com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
Itamar Reis Peixoto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |NEW
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #28 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #27 from Ron Olson ---
Gwyn, will you also add this to the EPEL 8 repo for CentOS/RHEL users?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #26 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #25 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnucobol
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #24 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #22 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Thank you!
Addressed all issues but -devel package for previously stated reasons.
SRPM:
https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/gnucobol/gnucobol-3.1-3.fc32.src.rpm
SPEC: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/revi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #20 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
I've removed the ldconfig requires in my local spec.
A devel package doesn't make sense in this instance, as this is a compiler. The
main package would need to require the -devel package to function, and t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #18 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
SRPM:
https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/gnucobol/gnucobol-3.1-2.fc32.src.rpm
SPEC: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/gnucobol/gnucobol.spec
Updated. The requires and lack of devel package are becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #17 from dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com ---
A few additional notes:
- Requires(post): /sbin/install-info is not required, the same is the case for
Requires(post/postun): /sbin/ldconfig.
- %setup -q -> %autosetup
- make %{?_smp_mflag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #16 from Rubén Lledó ---
(In reply to Gwyn Ciesla from comment #15)
> This isn't part of the current distributions, but I'll keep an eye on it.
Thanks! ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #15 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
This isn't part of the current distributions, but I'll keep an eye on it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #14 from Rubén Lledó ---
Hello.
It would be nice to have GnuCOBOL esqlOC packaged, as well.
https://sourceforge.net/p/open-cobol/contrib/HEAD/tree/trunk/esql/
Regards.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #13 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
SRPM:
https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/gnucobol/gnucobol-3.1-1.fc32.src.rpm
SPEC: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/gnucobol/gnucobol.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #12 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Updated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dan.cermak@cgc-instrumen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Thank you! I'll integrate these.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a.bad...@gmail.com
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Toshio beat me to it. :) https://sourceforge.net/p/open-cobol/patches/49/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
And I'll contact upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
I've applied the patch from the prior review to fix this issue.
SRPM:
https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/gnucobol/gnucobol-3.0-0.rc1.1.fc31.src.rpm
SPEC: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/gnucobol/gn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #5 from Artur Iwicki ---
I know, I remember that from Anton's review request. But I think if anything,
that's a reason to try and patch the configure script, rather than not use the
optflags.
Which reminds me, it might be a good i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
I'll fix the release and group.
Regarding flags, if we build with optflags, the -strong flag breaks the build.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
Gwyn Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
Gwyn Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tachokni...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 fr
36 matches
Mail list logo
