[Bug 1839887] Review Request: python-cle - A Python interface for analyzing binary formats

2020-06-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839887

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-945346ba94 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1839887] Review Request: python-cle - A Python interface for analyzing binary formats

2020-06-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839887



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-cle-8.20.6.1-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-945346ba94


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1839887] Review Request: python-cle - A Python interface for analyzing binary formats

2020-06-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839887



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-945346ba94 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-945346ba94


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1839887] Review Request: python-cle - A Python interface for analyzing binary formats

2020-06-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839887



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-9e72bd8f8b has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-9e72bd8f8b \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9e72bd8f8b

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1839887] Review Request: python-cle - A Python interface for analyzing binary formats

2020-06-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839887

W. Michael Petullo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2020-06-05 13:39:09




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1839887] Review Request: python-cle - A Python interface for analyzing binary formats

2020-06-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839887

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-9e72bd8f8b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9e72bd8f8b


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1839887] Review Request: python-cle - A Python interface for analyzing binary formats

2020-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839887



--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-cle


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1839887] Review Request: python-cle - A Python interface for analyzing binary formats

2020-06-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839887
Bug 1839887 depends on bug 1839888, which changed state.

Bug 1839888 Summary: Review Request: python-pyvex - A Python interface to 
libVEX and the VEX intermediate representation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839888

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1839887] Review Request: python-cle - A Python interface for analyzing binary formats

2020-06-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839887

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Issues were addressed, package APPROVED.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1839887] Review Request: python-cle - A Python interface for analyzing binary formats

2020-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839887



--- Comment #2 from W. Michael Petullo  ---
Spec URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/python-cle.spec
SRPM URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/python-cle-8.20.1.7-2.fc32.src.rpm
Description:
CLE loads binaries and their associated libraries, resolves imports
and provides an abstraction of process memory the same way as if it was
loader by the OS's loader.
Fedora Account System Username: mikep

- Added link to merge request for patch
- Delete eggs in prep
- Make use of "%{pypi_source}"

The install failure is due to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839888. The package there needs to
be approved before this one will install.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1839887] Review Request: python-cle - A Python interface for analyzing binary formats

2020-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839887

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@fabian-affolter.ch
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter  ---
The installation issue can be ignored for now as python-pyvex is not available
at the moment.

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
- The URL in "Source0:" could be replaced with "%{pypi_source}".
- Any possible available egg should be deleted in %prep.
- Link to upstream for patch is missing

= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License", "Unknown or generated". 83
 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1839887-python-cle/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
 packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
 versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
 use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[!]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate

[Bug 1839887] Review Request: python-cle - A Python interface for analyzing binary formats

2020-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839887

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
 Depends On||1839888
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839888
[Bug 1839888] Review Request: python-pyvex - A Python interface to libVEX and
the VEX intermediate representation
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1839887] Review Request: python-cle - A Python interface for analyzing binary formats

2020-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839887

W. Michael Petullo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1839889





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839889
[Bug 1839889] Review Request: python-angr - A multi-architecture binary
analysis toolkit
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org