[Bug 1846139] Review Request: mlxbf-aarch64-firmware - Boot firmware (ATF, UEFI...) for Mellanox BlueField
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846139 Alaa Hleihel (NVIDIA Mellanox) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(spen...@nvidia.co ||m) --- Comment #6 from Alaa Hleihel (NVIDIA Mellanox) --- (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #5) > (In reply to Alaa Hleihel (NVIDIA Mellanox) from comment #4) > > Any update on this BZ? > > See comment #3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846139#c3 Thanks, Peter. @spen...@nvidia.com can you comment on that? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1846139] Review Request: mlxbf-aarch64-firmware - Boot firmware (ATF, UEFI...) for Mellanox BlueField
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846139 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson --- (In reply to Alaa Hleihel (NVIDIA Mellanox) from comment #4) > Any update on this BZ? See comment #3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846139#c3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1846139] Review Request: mlxbf-aarch64-firmware - Boot firmware (ATF, UEFI...) for Mellanox BlueField
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846139 --- Comment #4 from Alaa Hleihel (NVIDIA Mellanox) --- Any update on this BZ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1846139] Review Request: mlxbf-aarch64-firmware - Boot firmware (ATF, UEFI...) for Mellanox BlueField
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846139 Spencer Lingard changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1853081 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853081 [Bug 1853081] Review Request: mlxbf-bfscripts - Helper scripts for Mellanox BlueField systems -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1846139] Review Request: mlxbf-aarch64-firmware - Boot firmware (ATF, UEFI...) for Mellanox BlueField
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846139 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson --- (In reply to Xose Vazquez Perez from comment #2) > Firmware should be sent to upstream repo: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/ No, I don't believe the early boot firmware such as ATF/UEFI etc fit the linux-firmware. The question here is if it's for updating firmwares using UEFI capsule updates on a SPI flash or whether they have to be on the same storage as the OS. If it's capsule updates these firmwares should use the LVFS and be dealt with separately to the OS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1846139] Review Request: mlxbf-aarch64-firmware - Boot firmware (ATF, UEFI...) for Mellanox BlueField
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846139 Xose Vazquez Perez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xose.vazq...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Xose Vazquez Perez --- Firmware should be sent to upstream repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/ Follow the instructions of: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tree/README -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1846139] Review Request: mlxbf-aarch64-firmware - Boot firmware (ATF, UEFI...) for Mellanox BlueField
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846139
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Source must be a URL, or you must document how to generate the archive.
Source: mlxbf-aarch64-firmware.tar.gz
- Not needed:
%defattr(644, root, root)
- Latest tag is 3.0.beta1-2, please get the archive from Github directly
- BetaX goes into Release field (as extraver) or use the tilde notation. See
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_versioning_prereleases_with_tilde
Version: 3.0~beta1-2
Release: 2%{?dist}
- This is basically binary firmwares with no source on how to build them?
Policy on Firmware for the record
Some applications, drivers, and hardware require binary-only firmware to boot
Fedora or function properly. Fedora permits inclusion of these files as long as
they meet the following requirements:
Requirements:
x The files are non-executable within the Fedora OS context (note: this
means that the files cannot run on their own, not that they are just chmod -x)
x The files are not libraries, within the Fedora OS context.
x The files are standalone, not embedded in executable or library code
(within the Fedora OS context).
x The files must be necessary for the functionality of open source code being
included in Fedora OR to enable Fedora to boot on a specific device, where no
other reliable and supported mechanisms exist.
x The files are available under an acceptable firmware license, which is
included with the files in the packaging.
The Fedora Project considers a firmware license acceptable if:
it allows some form of royalty-free use, subject to restrictions that the
Fedora Project has determined are acceptable for firmware licenses (see below),
and
it does not restrict redistribution in ways that would make a software
license unacceptable under Fedora licensing guidelines, except by:
requiring that the firmware be redistributed only as incorporated in
the redistributor's product (or as a maintenance update for existing end users
of the redistributor's product), possibly limited further to those products of
the redistributor that support or contain the hardware associated with the
licensed firmware; and
requiring the redistributor to pass on or impose conditions on users
that are no more restrictive than those authorized by this Fedora firmware
licensing policy.
A non-exhaustive list of restrictions on use that Fedora considers acceptable
for firmware licenses are:
any restrictions that are found in software licenses that are acceptable
for Fedora;
prohibitions on modification;
prohibitions on reverse engineering, disassembly or decompilation;
restricting use to use in conjunction with the hardware associated with the
firmware license.
If you are unsure whether or not your files meet these requirements, ask on
fedora-devel-list, and we will examine them for you.
The License tag for any firmware that disallows modification must be set to:
"Redistributable, no modification permitted"
Firmware packages must be named -firmware, where is the driver or
other hardware component that the firmware is for. In cases of firmware used to
boot Fedora on a device, must be the type of device(s) that the firmware
is intended for (e.g. raspberrypi).
I'm gonna ask legal or devel to be sure.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1846139] Review Request: mlxbf-aarch64-firmware - Boot firmware (ATF, UEFI...) for Mellanox BlueField
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846139 Alaa Hleihel (Mellanox) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ahlei...@redhat.com, ||ho...@redhat.com, ||mschm...@redhat.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1846139] Review Request: mlxbf-aarch64-firmware - Boot firmware (ATF, UEFI...) for Mellanox BlueField
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846139 Alaa Hleihel (Mellanox) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1656148 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
