https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
Qiyu Yan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
--- Comment #16 from Qiyu Yan ---
Last night (night, here), upstream have published a fix, I confirmed that it
will build on i686 just now[1]
I will build the new version without ExcludeArch tag, and update the
fcitx5-chinese-addons then
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
--- Comment #15 from Igor Raits ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libime
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
Qiyu Yan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
--- Comment #13 from Qiyu Yan ---
Added
ExcludeArch: i686
After approval and repo created I will follow:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_architecture_build_failures
to fill architecture_build_failures bug
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
Qiyu Yan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
--- Comment #12 from Andy Mender ---
Sounds good! I'll proceed with the rest of the reviews in the meantime.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
--- Comment #11 from Qiyu Yan ---
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #10)
> > If debian developers reports that ignoring the test on i686 doesn't lead to
> > bugs, I think we can do the same thing.
>
> By ignoring, you mean disabling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
--- Comment #10 from Andy Mender ---
> If debian developers reports that ignoring the test on i686 doesn't lead to
> bugs, I think we can do the same thing.
By ignoring, you mean disabling the failing tests? I don't think we can just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
--- Comment #9 from Qiyu Yan ---
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #7)
> > Contacting to csslayer (upstream developer) for help, and there is already
> > an upstream issue about this https://github.com/fcitx/libime/issues/4
> > This may
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
--- Comment #8 from Qiyu Yan ---
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #7)
> > Contacting to csslayer (upstream developer) for help, and there is already
> > an upstream issue about this https://github.com/fcitx/libime/issues/4
> > This may
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
--- Comment #7 from Andy Mender ---
> Contacting to csslayer (upstream developer) for help, and there is already an
> upstream issue about this https://github.com/fcitx/libime/issues/4
> This may take some time to fix :(`
Thanks for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
--- Comment #6 from Qiyu Yan ---
Contacting to csslayer (upstream developer) for help, and there is already an
upstream issue about this https://github.com/fcitx/libime/issues/4
This may take some time to fix :(`
libime only blocks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
--- Comment #5 from Andy Mender ---
Apologies for the delay with this one!
Triggered a Koji build from your F34 SRPM for this, but 3 tests are failing on
i686: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=49959204
Same thing happens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
--- Comment #4 from Qiyu Yan ---
Approved fcitx5 package are successfully built in koji (f34 and f33 released,
f32 in side-tag waiting for everything to be ready and to be pushed)
fvitx5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
--- Comment #3 from Andy Mender ---
Alright, looks good. Before I approve, could you make sure the fcitx5 packages
are built for all main archs in COPR?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
Bug 1868849 depends on bug 1868846, which changed state.
Bug 1868846 Summary: Review Request: fcitx5 - Next generation of fcitx
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868846
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
--- Comment #2 from Qiyu Yan ---
All fixed except the changelog part, rpm forge macros are doing some changing
and it behaviors differently on different fedora releases. We can't make
rpmlint happy in this case
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
Qiyu Yan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
--- Comment #1 from Andy Mender ---
> # both kenlm and libime are released under LGPL2+
> License:LGPLv2+ and MIT and BSD
Worth mentioning which parts are licensed under MIT and BSD if possible.
> %files
> %license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
Qiyu Yan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
Qiyu Yan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
Qiyu Yan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1868850
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868849
Qiyu Yan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1868846
Referenced Bugs:
26 matches
Mail list logo
