[Bug 1868854] Review Request: fcitx5-lua - Lua support for fcitx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868854 Qiyu Yan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-08-23 23:47:41 --- Comment #7 from Qiyu Yan --- Built in rawhide -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1868854] Review Request: fcitx5-lua - Lua support for fcitx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868854 --- Comment #6 from Igor Raits --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fcitx5-lua -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1868854] Review Request: fcitx5-lua - Lua support for fcitx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868854 Qiyu Yan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1868854] Review Request: fcitx5-lua - Lua support for fcitx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868854 Andy Mender changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Andy Mender --- Verified freshly in Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=49962023 Package approved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1868854] Review Request: fcitx5-lua - Lua support for fcitx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868854
--- Comment #4 from Qiyu Yan ---
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #3)
> Mid-submission EDIT:
> Thanks for the Koji build! I was about to post my COPR build. I'll start
> using Koji for this as well, since it doesn't seem to have the same issues
> as COPR.
>
> > BuildRequires: cmake, extra-cmake-modules
> > BuildRequires: gcc-c++, lua-devel
> > BuildRequires: ninja-build, fcitx5-devel
> > BuildRequires: gettext-devel
> > Requires: fcitx5-data
>
> Could you split these into individual lines for better readability?
>
> Also, it's probably a good idea to use the "pkgconfig(foo)" format for the
> dependencies inside fcitx5-devel if possible. In the fcitx5-qt package you
> used something like this:
> > BuildRequires: pkgconfig(Fcitx5Utils)
>
> And in fcitx5-rime something like this:
> > BuildRequires: pkgconfig(Fcitx5Core)
> > BuildRequires: pkgconfig(Fcitx5Module)
>
> > %files -f %{name}.lang
> > %license LICENSES/LGPL-2.1-or-later.txt
> > %doc README.md
> > %{_libdir}/fcitx5/luaaddonloader.so
> > %{_datadir}/fcitx5/*
> >
> > %files devel
> > %{_includedir}/Fcitx5/*
> > %{_libdir}/cmake/*
>
> Mid-submission EDIT:
> I saw you fixed the wildcards in the -devel subpackage, but I think the one
> used in the main package could also be improved:
> %{_datadir}/fcitx5/* changed to:
> %{_datadir}/fcitx5/addon/imeapi.conf # the %{_datadir}/fcitx5/addon dir
> is owned by another fcitx5 package
> %{_datadir}/fcitx5/addon/luaaddonloader.conf
> %{_datadir}/fcitx5/lua
>
>
Above are fixed
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
> [ ] = Manual review needed
>
>
> Issues:
> ===
> - Package installs properly.
> Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
> See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
>
>
> = MUST items =
>
> C/C++:
> [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
> [x]: Package contains no static executables.
> [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
> Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
> attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
> Review: The unversioned SO file luaaddonloader.so is for internal use
> only.
> Ignore error.
> [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
> BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
> [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
> [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
> [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
>
> Generic:
> [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
> one supported primary architecture.
> Note: Using prebuilt packages
> Review: Tested in COPR.
> [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
> other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
> Guidelines.
> [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
> Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
> found: "Unknown or generated". 49 files have unknown license. Detailed
> output of licensecheck in
> /home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/fcitx5-lua/fcitx5-lua/licensecheck.txt
> [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
> [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
> Note: No known owner of /usr/include/Fcitx5, /usr/share/fcitx5,
> /usr/lib64/fcitx5
> Review: Bogus, fcitx5-data and fcitx5-devel are listed as requirements.
> /usr/lib64/fcitx5 is owned by fcitx5-libs and picked up automatically
> via autodep.
> [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
> Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/fcitx5,
> /usr/lib64/fcitx5, /usr/include/Fcitx5
> Review: same as above.
> [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
> [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
> [x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
> Review: Yes, even though rpmlint complains.
> [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
> [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
> [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
> [?]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
> [x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
> [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
> names).
> [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
> [x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
> [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
> [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
> Provides are present.
> [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
> Review: Yes, but see the earlier pkgconfig(foo) comments.
> [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
> [-]:
[Bug 1868854] Review Request: fcitx5-lua - Lua support for fcitx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868854 Qiyu Yan changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/fcitx5/fedora-33-x86_64/01626593-fcitx5-lua/fcitx5-lua.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/fcitx5/fedora-33-x86_64/01626593-fcitx5-lua/fcitx5-lua-0-0.2.20200812gitd705404.fc33.src.rpm Description: Lua support for fcitx. Fedora Account System Username: yanqiyu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1868854] Review Request: fcitx5-lua - Lua support for fcitx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868854
--- Comment #3 from Andy Mender ---
Mid-submission EDIT:
Thanks for the Koji build! I was about to post my COPR build. I'll start using
Koji for this as well, since it doesn't seem to have the same issues as COPR.
> BuildRequires: cmake, extra-cmake-modules
> BuildRequires: gcc-c++, lua-devel
> BuildRequires: ninja-build, fcitx5-devel
> BuildRequires: gettext-devel
> Requires: fcitx5-data
Could you split these into individual lines for better readability?
Also, it's probably a good idea to use the "pkgconfig(foo)" format for the
dependencies inside fcitx5-devel if possible. In the fcitx5-qt package you used
something like this:
> BuildRequires: pkgconfig(Fcitx5Utils)
And in fcitx5-rime something like this:
> BuildRequires: pkgconfig(Fcitx5Core)
> BuildRequires: pkgconfig(Fcitx5Module)
> %files -f %{name}.lang
> %license LICENSES/LGPL-2.1-or-later.txt
> %doc README.md
> %{_libdir}/fcitx5/luaaddonloader.so
> %{_datadir}/fcitx5/*
>
> %files devel
> %{_includedir}/Fcitx5/*
> %{_libdir}/cmake/*
Mid-submission EDIT:
I saw you fixed the wildcards in the -devel subpackage, but I think the one
used in the main package could also be improved:
%{_datadir}/fcitx5/* changed to:
%{_datadir}/fcitx5/addon/imeapi.conf # the %{_datadir}/fcitx5/addon dir is
owned by another fcitx5 package
%{_datadir}/fcitx5/addon/luaaddonloader.conf
%{_datadir}/fcitx5/lua
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
Review: The unversioned SO file luaaddonloader.so is for internal use
only.
Ignore error.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
Review: Tested in COPR.
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 49 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in
/home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/fcitx5-lua/fcitx5-lua/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/include/Fcitx5, /usr/share/fcitx5,
/usr/lib64/fcitx5
Review: Bogus, fcitx5-data and fcitx5-devel are listed as requirements.
/usr/lib64/fcitx5 is owned by fcitx5-libs and picked up automatically via
autodep.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/fcitx5,
/usr/lib64/fcitx5, /usr/include/Fcitx5
Review: same as above.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
Review: Yes, even though rpmlint complains.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[?]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
Review: Yes, but see the earlier pkgconfig(foo) comments.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation
[Bug 1868854] Review Request: fcitx5-lua - Lua support for fcitx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868854 --- Comment #2 from Qiyu Yan --- A koji buid: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=49952759 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1868854] Review Request: fcitx5-lua - Lua support for fcitx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868854 --- Comment #1 from Qiyu Yan --- Hi, I just updated %files devel part, if you are running build, you can kill that and restart with the new version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1868854] Review Request: fcitx5-lua - Lua support for fcitx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868854 Qiyu Yan changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/fcitx5/fedora-33-x86_64/01626583-fcitx5-lua/fcitx5-lua.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/fcitx5/fedora-33-x86_64/01626583-fcitx5-lua/fcitx5-lua-0-0.2.20200812gitd705404.fc33.src.rpm Description: Lua support for fcitx. Fedora Account System Username: yanqiyu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1868854] Review Request: fcitx5-lua - Lua support for fcitx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868854 Andy Mender changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||andymenderu...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|andymenderu...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1868854] Review Request: fcitx5-lua - Lua support for fcitx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868854 Qiyu Yan changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/fcitx5/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01614375-fcitx5-lua/fcitx5-lua.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/fcitx5/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01614375-fcitx5-lua/fcitx5-lua-0-0.2.gitd705404.fc34.src.rpm Description: Lua support for fcitx. Fedora Account System Username: yanqiyu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1868854] Review Request: fcitx5-lua - Lua support for fcitx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868854 Bug 1868854 depends on bug 1868846, which changed state. Bug 1868846 Summary: Review Request: fcitx5 - Next generation of fcitx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868846 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1868854] Review Request: fcitx5-lua - Lua support for fcitx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868854 Qiyu Yan changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/fcitx5/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01612180-fcitx5-lua/fcitx5-lua.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/fcitx5/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01612180-fcitx5-lua/fcitx5-lua-0-0.2.gitd705404.fc34.src.rpm Description: Lua support for fcitx. Fedora Account System Username: yanqiyu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1868854] Review Request: fcitx5-lua - Lua support for fcitx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868854 Qiyu Yan changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/fcitx5/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01607821-fcitx5-lua/fcitx5-lua.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yanqiyu/fcitx5/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01607821-fcitx5-lua/fcitx5-lua-0-0.1.20200812gitd705404.fc33.src.rpm Description: Lua support for fcitx. Fedora Account System Username: yanqiyu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1868854] Review Request: fcitx5-lua - Lua support for fcitx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868854 Qiyu Yan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1868850 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868850 [Bug 1868850] Review Request: fcitx5-chinese-addons - Chinese related addon for fcitx5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1868854] Review Request: fcitx5-lua - Lua support for fcitx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868854 Qiyu Yan changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1868846 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868846 [Bug 1868846] Review Request: fcitx5 - Next generation of fcitx -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
