[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-10-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 --- Comment #19 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dnf5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-10-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+

[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-10-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 --- Comment #17 from Nicola Sella --- Update: > The dependency on systemd is strange. I believe dnf5 binary package should be > free of systemd. I have no idea why the dependency was generated here. removed %{?systemd_requires} > TODO:

[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-10-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 --- Comment #16 from Nicola Sella --- > TODO: Can the client talk to dnf5daemon-server over network? If it can, it > should not depend on dnf5daemon-server (multi-host scenario). Otherwise, I > recommend constraining the dependency with

[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 Nicola Sella changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(msu...@redhat.com

[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-10-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vondr...@redhat.com --- Comment #14

[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-10-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(ppi...@redhat.com | |)

[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-10-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 --- Comment #12 from Nicola Sella --- > [ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/dbus-1, > /etc/dbus-1, /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services, /usr/lib/.build-id/58, >

[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-10-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(ppi...@redhat.com

[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-10-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 --- Comment #10 from Nicola Sella --- Thank you, Petr. Here are the updated links for specfile and srpm. SPEC:

[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-10-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 --- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar --- And Perl packages are missing an explicit dependency on perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_...) . Also the

[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-10-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 --- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar --- From Perl packaging point of view the package names are wrong. perl5-libdnf5 should be called perl-libdnf5. I.e. without the digit 5 after perl. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always

[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-10-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 --- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar --- (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #6) > (In reply to Miroslav Suchý from comment #5) > > perl5-libdnf5.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol > > /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/libdnf5/repo/repo.so

[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-10-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 --- Comment #4 from Nicola Sella --- SPEC: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf5-src-fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04865112-dnf5/dnf5.spec SRPM:

[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-09-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msu...@redhat.com

[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-08-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 --- Comment #2 from nse...@redhat.com --- Hi, here's an updated link. SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf5-src-fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04760250-dnf5/dnf5-5.0.0-0~pre.fc38.src.rpm A note:

[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library

2022-08-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini --- The linked .spec file doesn't appear to match up with the linked SRPM file. Please make sure they correspond to each other. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.