https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #158 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #156 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
No epel7 branches yet.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Russell Doty rd...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rd...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #154 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
This review request is already CLOSED. Please don't discuss things here any
longer.
Bugs on cinnamon (if any) should be reported by opening a new bug against
cinnamon component.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Chris Smart fed...@christophersmart.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #151 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #150)
Not sure if I should open a new bug/request for this or not, however
menu.png is included in the Cinnamon package which means Fedora remixes
cannot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #152 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #151)
(In reply to comment #150)
Not sure if I should open a new bug/request for this or not, however
menu.png is included in the Cinnamon package which
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #149 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
cinnamon-1.4.0-8.UP1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #147 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
Feature submission deadline is tomorrow.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #148 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
It has been considered and decided against. However, I have propose MATE
desktop as a feature.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Romain DEP. rom1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rom1...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #145 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #144)
Hi, I just yum installed cinnamon, and got this bug :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/845791
installing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #124 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #122)
Some hints purely from looking at the spec and not the srpm:
- Don't use %define, consistently use %global
Done
- Don't use fuzzy patches but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #125 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
New SPEC and SRPM
SPEC:
http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/cinnamon/14/cinnamon.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #128 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: cinnamon
Short Description: A desktop engine based on Gnome 3.
Owners: vicodan leigh123linux rdieter
Branches: f17 f18
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #127 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Please raise any further concerns to Rex Dieter, my sponsor and Leigh's
sponsor.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #130 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #128)
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: cinnamon
Short Description: A desktop engine based on Gnome 3.
Owners: vicodan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #132 from Fabien Archambault marbolan...@gmail.com ---
I have built your latests SRPM succesfully on a F17 i686 laptop! I wanted to
thank all of you for this package. I am waiting for the repo version!
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #133 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
@Fabien,
:)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #134 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #131)
That link is invalid, please include me and rdieter as owners for your own
sake.
The link will work after cvs is set to + by the cvs admin.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #135 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
cool
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #136 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Best of luck to you Leigh! look forward to seeing this in Fedora!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #137 from Richard Körber red...@ml.shredzone.de ---
Thanks to everyone who made this package possible!
I'm looking forward for a Fedora 18 Cinnamon spin. ;-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #138 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #140 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
cinnamon-1.4.1-0.8.git7959517.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cinnamon-1.4.1-0.8.git7959517.fc17
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #141 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
cinnamon-1.4.0-8.UP1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cinnamon-1.4.0-8.UP1.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #117 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #116)
Leigh,
Fair enough. But how would I install on f17 if I need a version of muffin
that is not yet in the repo?
It should be in the stable repo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #119 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
To do for me:
Tested Cinnamon after reboot on F17 x86_64, everything seems in good shape,
need to test F18 builds, f17 i686 build and 3D mode on all builds.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #120 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to comment #118)
$ rpmlint cinnamon*
cinnamon.src:13: W: macro-in-comment %{_internal_version}
cinnamon.src:13: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
cinnamon.src:13: W:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #121 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #120)
(In reply to comment #118)
$ rpmlint cinnamon*
cinnamon.src:13: W: macro-in-comment %{_internal_version}
cinnamon.src:13: W: macro-in-comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #122 from Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org ---
Some hints purely from looking at the spec and not the srpm:
- Don't use %define, consistently use %global
- Don't use fuzzy patches but rebase them
- Don't use the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #123 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Thanks Christoph for your comments.
Leigh, I think we almost have a winner here.
I still have some testing to do but I was able to run both 3d and 2d mode
flawlessly.
I was very
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #97 from Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org ---
If we want to move this forward, we need to fix the bugs that prevent the
package from building in rawhide.
(In reply to comment #79)
F18 cinnamon fails here as well
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #98 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Seems to build fine on F18 here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4114255
Again, if you have nothing to offer to help remove this stalled review forward
please let
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #99 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
remove/move*.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||cinnamon
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #100 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Leigh, I know you've been working extremely hard on this package.
From the time I could spend on it (it's 12:48AM here) I think we should go for
a minimal working build and work our way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #101 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #97)
If we want to move this forward, we need to fix the bugs that prevent the
package from building in rawhide.
(In reply to comment #79)
F18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #103 from Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com ---
Futher to comment 102, please note that whenever a new SPEC and RPM are
intended to be used for the review, they should be listed in a comment in the
same format as in the header for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #104 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #102)
So:
* Which is the current spec / srpm the reviewer should review?
Please show the exact URLs on this bug.
SPEC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #105 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
SPEC:
http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/cinnamon/10/cinnamon.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #106 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
As you insist on a build for rawhide here it is, may god have mercy on your
souls (if you have one :-) )
SPEC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|methe...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #107 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #106)
As you insist on a build for rawhide here it is, may god have mercy on your
souls (if you have one :-) )
SPEC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
nonamed...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nonamed...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dan.mas...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #110 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
stilled/stalled*
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #111 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
Here my latest Spec file and srpm that I'm puuting forward for the review
process, please ignore all previous versions.
These will only build for F17 and F18!!
SPEC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #112 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Thanks Leigh,
I am looking at it now.
Dan
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #113 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Koji scratch builds:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4255909
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4255922
$ rpmlint cinnamon.spec
cinnamon.spec:13: W:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #114 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Correction to last line:
Please work with upstream to get their source fixed so that an internal
patched, modified version is NOT required, if possible.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #115 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #113)
TO DO:
Please remove specific version requirements from the spec file.
No, cinnamon has it's requirement
Please correct the spelling errors in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #116 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Leigh,
Fair enough. But how would I install on f17 if I need a version of muffin that
is not yet in the repo?
Dan
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #91 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #90)
(In reply to comment #88)
My hostile comments were aimed at Ralf Corsepius, not you.
What was hostile about my comments to justify your hostile
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #92 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Seriously 7 months later, and this has gone nowhere. Please remove yourself.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #94 from Trevor Pott trevo...@astlor.ca ---
I've been running this Cinnamon package on FC17 for some time now, and it
certainly isn't any buggier than Gnome 3. installs through YUM, uninstalls
through YUM (when you have a repo with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #95 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
As of right now, the bug is assigned to methe...@gmail.com though the review
flag isn't set. it seems that his intention was to be the reviewer here, but I
can't see much response from him
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Bobby Powers bo...@laptop.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bo...@laptop.org
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #90 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to comment #88)
My hostile comments were aimed at Ralf Corsepius, not you.
What was hostile about my comments to justify your hostile ad-hominem attacks?
So far, this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #83 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #82)
(In reply to comment #80)
export ACLOCAL_FLAGS=-I /usr/local/share/aclocal/
export
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #84 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #81)
Leigh,
I sent you an email. I'm finding MATE and Cinnamon to be quite similar in
the way they were written and the way they are built.
I have just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #85 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
I've been in contact with Wolfgang.
It's not formally packaged.
I guess you didn't find my comments helpful.
Ok.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #86 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #85)
I've been in contact with Wolfgang.
It's not formally packaged.
I suggested this as it saves duplication of work.
I guess you didn't find my
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #87 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Again,
My intention was not talk about Mate here. My intention was to help you with
Cinnamon.
I looked at your spec file and tried to build.
Considering it's taken you 7 months and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #88 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #87)
Again,
My intention was not talk about Mate here. My intention was to help you with
Cinnamon.
I looked at your spec file and tried to build.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #89 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Apology accepted.
I will look for you on IRC.
Thanks,
Dan
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #80 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Yeah that is normal and more of a warning than an error.
I get the same error when building mate from source. For mate I use the
following command:
./autogen.sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #81 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Leigh,
I sent you an email. I'm finding MATE and Cinnamon to be quite similar in the
way they were written and the way they are built.
I have just started finished building the first RPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #82 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to comment #80)
export ACLOCAL_FLAGS=-I /usr/local/share/aclocal/
export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/:/usr/local/share/pkgconfig/
export
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(e...@brouhaha.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #77 from Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com ---
Created attachment 596911
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=596911action=edit
mock root.log resulting from fedora-packager
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #78 from Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com ---
Running fedora-review against this review request bug fails to build cinnamon
with mock, which is surprising since it apparently builds with koji. The mock
build (for rawhide) reports in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #79 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #78)
Running fedora-review against this review request bug fails to build
cinnamon with mock, which is surprising since it apparently builds with
koji. The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #74 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
I think Leigh's repo is outside the scope of this review.
I built and tried cinnamon-1.4.0-6.UP1.fc16.src.rpm on F17 and
it seems to work just fine.
So is anyone planning to complete
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #75 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
I'll try to get someone to review this tomorrow. I tried to build this and
noticed some issues but this is way out of my league.
Good job Leigh, I definitely believe this a sorely missed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |dan.mas...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Jeff Layton jlay...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jlay...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #68 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #67)
Agreed, that doesn't seem to be an issue with cinnamon, but rather with
muffin. Has anyone filed a bug against it?
Yes, 5 months ago.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #69 from Jeff Layton jlay...@redhat.com ---
Well, there is a bit of a problem here...not with the cinnamon package, but
with your repo...
It looks like there are newer muffin packages within that repo that will
probably conflict with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #70 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Are there any other renaming issues with the current submission?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #71 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #69)
Well, there is a bit of a problem here...not with the cinnamon package, but
with your repo...
It looks like there are newer muffin packages within
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
