https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378160
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|VERIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378014
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-IO-FDPass-1.1-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376869
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378999
Bug ID: 1378999
Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Mock-Guard - Simple mock
test library using RAII
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378999
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1377444
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290337
--- Comment #2 from Christoph Junghans ---
3 questions:
- Does it make sense to install the javadoc without the actual package -
Missing "Require:"?
- pom.xml isn't packaged, why?
- There seem to be tests in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378014
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-IO-FDPass-1.1-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377444
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1378999
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977116
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373666
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378014
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-IO-FDPass-1.1-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373666
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
hddfancontrol-1.2.4-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378160
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
jitterentropy-rngd-1.0.3-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369534
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376869
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
gap-pkg-lpres-0.3.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362490
--- Comment #25 from Tim Flink ---
(In reply to Jared Smith from comment #24)
> You're going to need to adjust the license tag on this package.
> Licensecheck found several licenses other than Apache in parts of the code
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373486
--- Comment #10 from Miro Hrončok ---
s/Peter/Petr/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290337
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Christoph Junghans from comment #2)
> 3 questions:
> - Does it make sense to install the javadoc without the actual package -
> Missing "Require:"?
No
> [?]: Fully
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290339
Luya Tshimbalanga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378341
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
The general form of the spec looks fine, but you're missing buildrequires.
Running fedora-review caused it to bomb out because "a2x" was not found. Please
review your build-time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373486
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pvikt...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378014
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971
--- Comment #12 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
SCM request
F25: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7934
Master: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7935
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290339
Luya Tshimbalanga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290339
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Thanks for the review!
create new SCM requests:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7936
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290339
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348162
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-net-dns-0.8.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332052
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
python-filelock-2.0.6-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348202
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-pcaprub-0.12.4-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364805
Lukáš Nykrýn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|xsk...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364805
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Maixner ---
I'm going to look at it next week
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332052
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
python-filelock-2.0.6-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348202
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-pcaprub-0.12.4-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348162
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-net-dns-0.8.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376899
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376899
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review- |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374024
--- Comment #9 from girish joshi ---
I've updated the spec file and srpm
Specfile Url:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/girish946/plot-cat/master/python-plotcat.spec
Srpm Url:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378021
--- Comment #6 from Michael Simacek ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #5)
> Issues:
> [!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
> See maven-shade-plugin and maven-bundle-plugin tasks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378028
--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth ---
Updated to 1.805:
Spec URL:
http://subversion.city-fan.org/repos/cfo-repo/perl-MCE-Shared/branches/fedora/perl-MCE-Shared.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378740
--- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko ---
> %{python3_sitelib}/__pycache__/
I suppose you wanted %{python3_sitelib}/__pycache__/pytest_faulthandler.*
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378021
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
Pòease, remove "cp -p %{SOURCE1} ."
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353224
Alfredo Moralejo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378860
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378740
Bug ID: 1378740
Summary: Review Request: python-pytest-faulthandler - py.test
plugin that activates the fault handler module for
tests
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353224
Alfredo Moralejo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338339
Till Hofmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(till.hofmann@post |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378860
Bug ID: 1378860
Summary: Review Request: jetty-setuid - SetUID support for
jetty
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977116
--- Comment #56 from Sandro Mani ---
If you do MinGW reviews, could you have a look at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378807?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378807
Bug ID: 1378807
Summary: Review Request: mingw-podofo - MinGW Windows podofo
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378021
--- Comment #8 from Michael Simacek ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #7)
> Pòease, remove "cp -p %{SOURCE1} ."
Done.
Spec URL: https://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/jetty-alpn.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378021
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo ---
is not enough "%pom_remove_plugin :maven-shade-plugin". Please, use
"%pom_remove_plugin -r :maven-shade-plugin". "org.eclipse.jetty.alpn:alpn-api"
is till shaded: "[INFO] ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375744
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
Issues:
[?]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
Note: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`";
echo $version)) missing?
for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378021
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #6)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #5)
> > Issues:
> > [!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
> > See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378445
Fl@sh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378740
--- Comment #2 from Dominika Krejčí ---
Fixed:
Spec URL:
https://dkrejci.fedorapeople.org/python-pytest-faulthandler/python-pytest-faulthandler.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332052
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-filelock-2.0.6-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378021
--- Comment #11 from Michael Simacek ---
Done
Spec URL: https://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/jetty-alpn.spec
SRPM URL:
https://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/jetty-alpn-8.1.9-3.v20160720.fc24.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378445
--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter ---
Spec URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kf5/kf5-kirigami.spec
SRPM URL:
https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kf5/kf5-kirigami-1.0.2-2.fc24.src.rpm
%changelog
* Fri Sep 23 2016
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378445
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/kf5-kirigami
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378077
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/jetty-test-helper
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378021
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378860
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378445
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376899
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/pcaudiolib
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378445
Fl@sh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378860
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1378077
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378077
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1378860
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378860
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #1)
> hi
> sorry for the noise, some hints:
> License field is wrong:
> EPL-1.0
Sorry, my mistake, license field is correct
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378860
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #1)
> rpmlint output:
> Checking: jetty-setuid-1.0.3-1.fc26.i686.rpm
> jetty-setuid-javadoc-1.0.3-1.fc26.i686.rpm
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373486
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378021
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/jetty-alpn
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368623
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-hamcrest-1.8.5-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373487
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376207
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290337
Christoph Junghans changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373486
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971
--- Comment #3 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
(In reply to stan from comment #2)
> I don't know if it helps, but I saw your message asking for review and
> decided to try these packages. I am not a reviewer, but I am
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
have time for this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290339 ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370473
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-fauxquests-1.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370469
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-dict-sorted-1.0.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971
Bug ID: 1378971
Summary: Review Request: f25-backgrounds - Fedora 25 default
desktop background
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287802
Greg Swift changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gregsw...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971
--- Comment #1 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
Scratch build result:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15770685
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362487
--- Comment #12 from Tim Flink ---
Spec URL:
https://tflink.fedorapeople.org/packages/phabricator-review/arcanist/arcanist.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971
stan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gr...@q.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #27 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~honclo/tss2.spec
SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~honclo/tss2-713-4.el6.src.rpm
Description:
TSS2 is a user space Trusted Computing Group's Software Stack (TSS)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #28 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
(In reply to Tomas Mraz from comment #26)
> (In reply to lo1 from comment #24)
> > The developer has been using nonstandard variables such as LNFLAGS (as
> > opposed to LDFLAGS) and CCFLAGS (for CFLAGS)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362487
--- Comment #13 from Tim Flink ---
Note that the content is still the same, I just rebuilt the SRPM from sources
because the link in c#6 goes to a .noarch instead of a .src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374957
Tim Flink changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tfl...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
Issues:
- Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-
file-validate if there is such a file.
NON blocking issues:
f25-backgrounds.noarch: W:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362487
--- Comment #14 from Jared Smith ---
The version and release tags are still wrong. As I mentioned in comment number
1 and in person at Flock, you should set the Version: tag to 0 and the Release:
tag to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290339
Luya Tshimbalanga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
desktop-file-validate
~/1378971-f25-backgrounds/rpms-unpacked/f25-backgrounds-kde-25.0.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm/usr/share/wallpapers/F25/metadata.desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971
--- Comment #8 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #4)
> have time for this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290339 ?
Taken.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362490
--- Comment #24 from Jared Smith ---
You're going to need to adjust the license tag on this package. Licensecheck
found several licenses other than Apache in parts of the code base:
GPL (v3 or later)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362487
--- Comment #15 from Tim Flink ---
Spec URL:
https://tflink.fedorapeople.org/packages/phabricator-review/arcanist/arcanist.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971
--- Comment #9 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #7)
> desktop-file-validate
> ~/1378971-f25-backgrounds/rpms-unpacked/f25-backgrounds-kde-25.0.0-1.fc26.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo