https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #31 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~honclo/tss2.spec
SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~honclo/tss2-713-5.fc24.src.rpm
Description:
TSS2 is a user space Trusted Computing Group's Software Stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375670
--- Comment #3 from Charalampos Stratakis ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #2)
> Could you please commit (or PR) it into the GH repo?
> https://github.com/fedora-python/python26
>
> Thanks
Is it required for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372123
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379421
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1379432
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379432
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1379421
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375744
--- Comment #8 from Christoph Junghans ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #7)
> Issues:
>
> [?]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
> Note: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379393
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359914
--- Comment #9 from MartinKG ---
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/lollypop.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/lollypop-0.9.205-1.fc24.src.rpm
%changelog
* Mon Sep 26 2016
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377733
--- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Hi,
I was travelling the last few days, I couldn't participate in the conversation.
I'm fine with adding a Recommend. This package is tiny, so this shouldn't be an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379432
Bug ID: 1379432
Summary: Review Request: odoo - Suite of web based open source
business apps
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #32 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
Updated Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~honclo/tss2.spec
Updated SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~honclo/tss2-713-6.fc24.src.rpm
Koji Build:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375744
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #33 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
(In reply to yunying.sun from comment #29)
> From Fedora packaging guideline, ExcludeArch is preferred than
> ExclusiveArch, see "ExcludeArch & ExclusiveArch" part @
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375670
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
Could you please commit (or PR) it into the GH repo?
https://github.com/fedora-python/python26
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375744
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375670
--- Comment #1 from Charalampos Stratakis ---
On koji the build finishes successfully for f23, while this is not the case for
copr f23 chroots.
The issue here are zombie processes left behind due to a test case in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769487
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379393
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806117
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379421
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: Review |Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379421
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379393
Bug ID: 1379393
Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol-qt - Qt port of volume
control pavucontrol
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362487
--- Comment #17 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
(In reply to Jared Smith from comment #16)
> 3) It's not a huge deal, but rpmlint is complaining that the bash completion
> file isn't marked as %config(noreplace) instead of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327981
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Spura ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #6)
> any movement here folks?
Thanks for the ping.
Any help with other depending packages of the python notebook is welcome.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379460
Bug ID: 1379460
Summary: Review Request: kompose - Tool to move from
`docker-compose` to Kubernetes
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379460
Dusty Mabe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jchal...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327981
Bug 1327981 depends on bug 1327989, which changed state.
Bug 1327989 Summary: Review Request: python-jupyter-client - Jupyter protocol
implementation and client libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327989
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375744
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gasnet
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #34 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
(In reply to Tomas Mraz from comment #30)
> I would say that in using Exclude vs. ExclusiveArch we should apply some
> reasoning - if it is positively known that the package does not work on
> anything
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327979
Bug 1327979 depends on bug 1327989, which changed state.
Bug 1327989 Summary: Review Request: python-jupyter-client - Jupyter protocol
implementation and client libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327989
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327989
Thomas Spura changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373487
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python33
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324863
--- Comment #5 from Dridi Boukelmoune ---
May I suggest per-module virtual provides?
So that a user could `dnf install vmod-cookie` for instance. With this package
and my own submission in bug 1379174 I think we
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361584
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324863
--- Comment #6 from Ingvar Hagelund ---
(In reply to Dridi Boukelmoune from comment #5)
> May I suggest per-module virtual provides?
Please :-)
> So that a user could `dnf install vmod-cookie` for instance. With this
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379254
Bug ID: 1379254
Summary: Review Request: python-docker-pycreds - Python
bindings for the docker credentials store API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379254
Tomas Tomecek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1373386
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #30 from Tomas Mraz ---
I would say that in using Exclude vs. ExclusiveArch we should apply some
reasoning - if it is positively known that the package does not work on
anything else than x86_64 ppc64le armv7hl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378445
Markus S. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kamika...@web.de
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379432
--- Comment #1 from Björn "besser82" Esser ---
Correct urls:
Spec URL: https://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/odoo.spec
SRPM URL:
https://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/odoo-9.0c.20160923-0.1.fc26.src.rpm
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279093
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|punto...@libero.it |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376450
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libdvbpsi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030751
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379421
Bug ID: 1379421
Summary: Review Request: Review Request: python-psycogreen -
Psycopg2 integration with co-routine libraries
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377444
--- Comment #2 from d. johnson ---
Approved after two minor items:
* Note: License file LICENSE is marked as %doc instead of %license
[!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378999
--- Comment #2 from d. johnson ---
Approved after two minor items:
* Note: License file LICENSE is marked as %doc instead of %license
[!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342839
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377444
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378999
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378999
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377444
d. johnson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377444
d. johnson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377252
Bug 1377252 depends on bug 1377228, which changed state.
Bug 1377228 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings - Fail if
tests warn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377228
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378999
d. johnson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
--- Comment #29 from yunying@intel.com ---
Fixed a typo in ExcludeArch list.
Updated SPEC:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yunyings/share/master/tpm2-tss.spec
Updated SRPMS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376450
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libdvbpsi-1.3.0-3.fc26.src.rpm
SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libdvbpsi.spec
Description: Library for MPEG TS and DVB PSI tables
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376450
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378077
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378860
Bug 1378860 depends on bug 1378077, which changed state.
Bug 1378077 Summary: Review Request: jetty-test-helper - Jetty toolchain test
helper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378077
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379090
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-qtconsole
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366845
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/reactor
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317887
Tomas Sykora changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tosyk...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324863
--- Comment #8 from Ingvar Hagelund ---
Something like this?
https://ingvar.fedorapeople.org/varnish/varnish-modules.spec
https://ingvar.fedorapeople.org/varnish/varnish-modules-0.9.2-0.1.20160924gitdaa4f1d.fc24.src.rpm
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290342
Bug 1290342 depends on bug 1290339, which changed state.
Bug 1290339 Summary: Review Request: curve25519-java - Implementation of
Curve25519 in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290339
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290339
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317887
Radovan Sroka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|tosyk...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317887
Tomas Sykora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tosyk...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317887
Tomas Sykora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324863
--- Comment #10 from Dridi Boukelmoune ---
I'm certainly against the varnish ABI dependency, I will submit a patch as you
requested. In the mean time please remove:
Requires: varnishabi-5.0
For the virtual
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379093
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-pickleshare
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375670
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324863
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/varnish-modules
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346245
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/resultsdb_frontend
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324863
--- Comment #9 from Ingvar Hagelund ---
(In reply to Ingvar Hagelund from comment #8)
> Something like this?
>
> https://ingvar.fedorapeople.org/varnish/varnish-modules.spec
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290342
Bug 1290342 depends on bug 1290337, which changed state.
Bug 1290337 Summary: Review Request: ed25519-java - Implementation of EdDSA
(Ed25519) in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290337
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290337
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/bitstream.spec
SRPM URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/bitstream-1.1-2.fc26.src.rpm
Description: Simpler access to binary structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378021
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/f25-backgrounds
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373487
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379331
Bug ID: 1379331
Summary: Review Request: libfm-qt - Companion library for
PCManFM
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379331
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222
--- Comment #5 from Germano Massullo ---
As soon as possible I will integrate patch [1] that solves test problems in
1.0.3
[1]:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290339
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/curve25519-java
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290337
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/ed25519-java
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324863
--- Comment #11 from Ingvar Hagelund ---
(In reply to Dridi Boukelmoune from comment #10)
> I'm certainly against the varnish ABI dependency, I will submit a patch as
> you requested. In the mean time please remove:
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
maybe you should update license field, if mpeg/psi/psi.h is under MIT (style)
license
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290342
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/ecc-25519-java.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/ecc-25519-java-1.0.3-1.fc24.src.rpm
- update to 1.0.3
Task info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362490
--- Comment #26 from Jared Smith ---
(In reply to Tim Flink from comment #25)
> > MIT/X11 (BSD like)
> > --
> > libphutil-8f8e02d47569dce5f035383d8bcbf7a08481e839/externals/jsonlint/LICENSE
>
> Why
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327989
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348005
Bug 1348005 depends on bug 1348162, which changed state.
Bug 1348162 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-net-dns - Pure Ruby DNS library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348162
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348202
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372718
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377812
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348005
Bug 1348005 depends on bug 1348202, which changed state.
Bug 1348202 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-pcaprub - libpcap bindings for ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348202
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348206
Bug 1348206 depends on bug 1348202, which changed state.
Bug 1348202 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-pcaprub - libpcap bindings for ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348202
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279093
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Mailänder ---
https://pkgs.org/fedora-rawhide/fedora-i386/smuxi-engine-1.0.5-1.fc25.i686.rpm.html
already bundles it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo