https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372938
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375735
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-asciitree-0.3.3-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378740
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379254
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-docker-pycreds-0.2.1-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152
Bug ID: 1382152
Summary: Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380155
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379254
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380156
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220103
--- Comment #3 from Athos Ribeiro ---
ping
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152
--- Comment #1 from Jared Wallace ---
Another side note: packaging guidelines require a bug to be filed when the
package in question does not build on a particular architecture. This will not
build on armv7hl but I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375735
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
python-asciitree-0.3.3-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380155
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.el7, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.el7 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380156
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.el7, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.el7 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
l...@us.ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||238953
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375735
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
python-asciitree-0.3.3-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380155
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.fc23, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.fc23 has
been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380156
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.fc24, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.fc24 has
been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380155
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.fc24, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.fc24 has
been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380156
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.fc23, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.fc23 has
been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298131
--- Comment #2 from Mohamed El Morabity ---
Update to 0.33.0
Spec URL:
https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-azure-storage/python-azure-storage.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
l...@us.ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||485231
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375735
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #40 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
(In reply to Tomas Mraz from comment #37)
> Please remove the %defattr(0644,root,root,-) in the -devel subpackage, this
> is causing:
>
> tss2-devel.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375993
--- Comment #2 from Aurelien Bompard ---
I renamed the package and used macros for the summary and description. Thanks.
Spec URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.i18n/python-flufl-i18n.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375999
--- Comment #3 from Aurelien Bompard ---
Spec URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.bounce/python-flufl-bounce.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
--- Comment #1 from Michael Simacek ---
There have been some doubts about the licensing of the artifact, due to the
fact that in order to download it from upstream web page, it requires the user
to agree to a non-free
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
I got the license tags from the SUSE spec[1] and translated it to our short
tags. Since SUSE is the upstream and they have a spec, I trust that the tag
information is correct.
[1]:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935
Bug ID: 1381935
Summary: Review Request: python-distro - Linux Distribution - a
Linux OS platform information API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369535
--- Comment #3 from Aurelien Bompard ---
Ah, I found the problem, on EPEL I have to use the rubygem-minitest5 package
because the tests require at least version 5. I've updated the package:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984700
--- Comment #26 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner (DAASI International) from comment #25)
> Can someone please remove the alias? It's not possible to generally search
> for sddm bugs. I am not allowed to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257
--- Comment #36 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #35)
> The fact that the check behaves differently in local mock, koji, and copr
> suggests a real problem with undefined behaviour, which I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984700
--- Comment #27 from Rex Dieter ---
I would prefer the alias remain
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381548
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(zbys...@in.waw.pl |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375962
--- Comment #4 from Julien Enselme ---
> Also, PYTHONPATH=$(pwd) can be just PYTHONPATH=., the result is the same.
Indeed, but I took the habit to use pwd to have absolute path.
Tests should pass now:
- SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144865
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114215
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Miroslav Suchý from comment #1)
> If you intend to package rest of OBS you may check chapter 5 from
> http://is.muni.cz/th/325243/fi_m/thesis.pdf
I do intend to try to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381548
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pemen...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369535
Aurelien Bompard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(aurelien@bompard. |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1271193
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||Reopened
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
Bug ID: 1381892
Summary: Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378028
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380420
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348202
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-pcaprub-0.12.4-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378341
cl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #41 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
Fedora Account System Username: honclo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376001
--- Comment #2 from Aurelien Bompard ---
I renamed the package, and use macros for the summary and description. Thanks.
Spec URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.lock/python-flufl-lock.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372881
Parag Nemade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchý ---
Package looks good.
My only concern is license.
License check say it that everythin is just GPL and only GPL (v2) are:
obs-build-20160809/build-pkg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375999
--- Comment #2 from Aurelien Bompard ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
> Same comments as for the other review, see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376001#c1.
>
> Also, don't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379814
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373487
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python33-3.3.6-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372938
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984700
Raphael Groner (DAASI International) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
* Naming is correct.
* License is correct.
* Python 2 and Python 3 subpackages are being correctly generated for Fedora.
However, I see a few issues:
* Starting with Fedora 23, the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
--- Comment #24 from Tomas Repik ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #23)
> caffeine replace
> com.googlecode.concurrentlinkedhashmap:concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru
> (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486
--- Comment #19 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #17)
> Can you reply the comment about license in comment #c11?
Thx for your reply.
I think I got your comment wrong
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064
Bug 1357064 depends on bug 1381197, which changed state.
Bug 1381197 Summary: Please build a package for EPEL7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381197
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486
--- Comment #20 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libglvnd.spec
SRPM URL:
http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libglvnd-0.2.999-2.git14f6283.fc24.src.rpm
Changelog:
- Add Correct License:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378028
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-MCE-Shared-1.805-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381029
--- Comment #2 from Ranjan Maitra ---
I am having a problem with the new SPEC file. It does not compile. Here is the
error I get.
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/more.py", line 162
min_or_max = partial(max if reverse else
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
Oh, also, your description in the python3 subpackage says it's the python 2
version, which it obviously is not.
You may choose to wrap the common description in a macro and reuse it for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486
--- Comment #18 from leigh scott ---
Debian used BSD-3-clause license for libglvnd
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-nvidia/libglvnd.git/tree/debian/copyright
To me the license looks like it should be MIT and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
--- Comment #2 from Michael Simacek ---
Removed the alias, because it conflicts with felix and breaks stuff.
Spec URL: https://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/osgi-core.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
--- Comment #13 from gil cattaneo ---
Blocker:
[?]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264656
--- Comment #8 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #6)
> BTW how are you going address the bundling?
You still have not addressed this concern ^^. If you are going to keep the
bundled library, then
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935
--- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #2)
> * You are hard-requiring /bin/lsb_release, which upstream says is not
> necessary. Please downgrade it to Recommends, as the lsb package has
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
as for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193#c14 "Lifting
FE-Legal"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/osgi-core
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
Please, add Richard Fontana email as an attachment
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/osgi-compendium
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264660
--- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch ---
You don't specify runtime dependency on any of GraphicsMagick or ImageMagick.
Shouldn't you choose one? Which is preferred? Shouldn't you use "Recommends" to
make this working out of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378740
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-pytest-faulthandler
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
--- Comment #25 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #24)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #23)
> > caffeine replace
> > com.googlecode.concurrentlinkedhashmap:concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355592
--- Comment #5 from W. Michael Petullo ---
Update to newer Git version.
Spec URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/libvmi.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/libvmi-0.11.0-1.20161003git5ad492c.fc24.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
Tomas Mraz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
Tomas Mraz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #38 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Blocker:
[?]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375735
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-asciitree
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279087
Pravin Satpute changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091
Bug 1159091 depends on bug 1279087, which changed state.
Bug 1279087 Summary: Review Request: sharpfont - Cross-platform FreeType
bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279087
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279087
Pravin Satpute changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo