https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-5.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442275
--- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Can this be closed?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448687
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443777
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Can this be closed?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745
--- Comment #3 from Roman Joost ---
There is quite some stuff going in to the gem dir which I wonder is perhaps out
of your control. I also can't see any guidelines in the wiki. The only missing
piece from approving the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424963
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kaiw...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745
--- Comment #2 from Roman Joost ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478705
--- Comment #3 from Robin Lee ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #2)
> So there a small error: it should be "License: GPLv3+" (and not GPLv3).
> It's possible that this is what you had in mind,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444562
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479022
Bug ID: 1479022
Summary: Review Request: preeny - Some helpful preload
libraries for pwning stuff
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479027
Bug ID: 1479027
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-golang-image - Go
supplementary image libraries
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426972
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1479027
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479027
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1426972
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
Bug 526126 depends on bug 226342, which changed state.
Bug 226342 Summary: Merge Review: python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226342
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387
Bug 426387 depends on bug 226342, which changed state.
Bug 226342 Summary: Merge Review: python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226342
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462465
--- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner ---
https://pagure.io/dist-git-requests/issue/36
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479073
Bug ID: 1479073
Summary: Review Request: tcl-tclnagios - Library to simplify
writing Nagios plugins in Tcl
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460458
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466844
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450501
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434578
c72...@yahoo.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392457
Petr Viktorin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443076
--- Comment #39 from jiri vanek ---
(In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #35)
> (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #34)
> > > - Some config files are not in conf: It's likely an upstream issue
> > > as I see them
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434578
--- Comment #4 from c72...@yahoo.de ---
Additional info:
The requirements for LaTeXila Release 3.25.1 are fulfilled in F26.
e.g. GtkSourceView >= 3.24
Compilation tests with LaTeXila 3.25.1 and Tepl 2.99.2 under F26 have been OK.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478705
--- Comment #1 from Robin Lee ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- gtk-update-icon-cache is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434578
--- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember ---
Fedora 26 has GNOME 3.24 and to match this we'll need to put latexila 3.24.x
there which in turn requires gtef.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336161
cl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cl...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434578
--- Comment #8 from c72...@yahoo.de ---
Some initial review comments:
- This BR is not needed: gcc
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
- The last released version of gtef was 2.0.1 before the rename to Tepl.
Please
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421058
--- Comment #7 from sensor@gmail.com ---
Diff:
https://github.com/FZUG/repo/commit/23c189b5fed5a5899dc0150a00e581722795a2ef
:) Thanks, it's not your not fault.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474033
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Maslennikov ---
Spec URL:
https://gist.github.com/amaslenn/3c847e0bdc063bcbb4b6507b5efbf6b9/raw/708923dcd5342351cda488fa51cf296091abfac1/ucx.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469331
--- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System ---
fedrepo-req-0.5.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466844
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
modtools-0.0.1-4.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469331
--- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System ---
fedrepo-req-0.5.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478703
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476560
--- Comment #5 from sensor@gmail.com ---
Diff:
https://github.com/FZUG/repo/commit/260e289c3ff55635f076bcf3992895a0d338a1c6
Ok, thanks :) It deleted.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421058
--- Comment #8 from sensor@gmail.com ---
Diff:
https://github.com/FZUG/repo/commit/23c189b5fed5a5899dc0150a00e581722795a2ef
:) Thanks, it's not your fault.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478703
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469331
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System ---
fedrepo-req-0.5.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426193
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467651
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450212
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434578
--- Comment #6 from c72...@yahoo.de ---
"LaTeXila follows the GNOME versions". With the motivation:
It is easier to know with which GNOME version a certain LaTeXila version was
developed against.
https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/LaTeXila/History
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469331
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466844
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478705
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477154
Tomas Tomecek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477154
Tomas Tomecek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
Rutvij Karkhanis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426972
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(athoscribeiro@gma |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
Rutvij Karkhanis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #13 from José Matos ---
I am the reviewer. :-)
And I was happy to see the discussion.
One note, when you update the spec file you should update the release number.
That helps the reviewer (and is present in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-5.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443076
--- Comment #41 from Severin Gehwolf ---
(In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #40)
> (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #36)
> > Yah. I noted. Already respined:
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443076
--- Comment #40 from Severin Gehwolf ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #36)
> Yah. I noted. Already respined:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21048132
BuildError: The following noarch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478705
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465335
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432993
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432993
--- Comment #12 from Randy Barlow ---
Created attachment 1310254
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1310254=edit
review-2.txt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
58 matches
Mail list logo