https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
--- Comment #11 from Jan Pokorný ---
I'll happily assign myself as a reviewer if there're no complaints.
For a start, the spec is needlessly overcomplicated around conditionals:
- instead of
> %bcond_without sctp
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539161
--- Comment #2 from Carl George ---
I came across this today.
https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/34226
I think it's worth considering starting this package with those binary names to
avoid having to change them later.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537727
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-cattrs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910146
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910699
Bug 910699 depends on bug 910146, which changed state.
Bug 910146 Summary: Review Request: python-socksipychain - Python SOCKS/HTTP
Proxy module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910146
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
timeshift-18.1.1-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
timeshift-18.1.1-4.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539366
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
timeshift-18.1.1-4.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539920
--- Comment #1 from Tom Stellard ---
Spec URL:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/tstellar/rocm-1.6-userspace/rocm-runtime.git/plain/rocm-runtime.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506428
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Toskin ---
Rex, could you maybe mark this as approved again? Along with the other split
package, in Bug #1506429?
Or do I have to start over with a new review request, even though the packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177055
Bugzilla account termination changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|tstcl...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539781
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506429
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506428
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506428
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506429
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539920
Bug ID: 1539920
Summary: Review Request: rocm-runtime - ROCm runtime driver for
AMD compute
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539281
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539161
Carl George changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536993
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #50 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #33)
> kmk need this [1] all least in my case ...
>
> [1]
> +VBOX_PATH_APP_PRIVATE=%{_libdir}/virtualbox \
> +
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513283
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539554
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1519719,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509856
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1539554
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519719
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1539554
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513774
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910146
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
python-socksipychain-2.0.15-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-2cf21e719f
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #53 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #52)
> @Hans,
>
> The spec file doesn't include this new change. Can you please upload it?
It is already there, but I messed up the link (Caps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #54 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
There is nothing holding review maybe exept that the 4.16-rc1 kernel lands (or
maybe even before rc1). Does it have everything needed ?
I plan to do some runtime tests once
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539281
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
rust-chan-0.1.20-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b1e007e911
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #52 from Neal Gompa ---
@Hans,
The spec file doesn't include this new change. Can you please upload it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #55 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #54)
> There is nothing holding review maybe except that the 4.16-rc1 kernel lands
> (or maybe even before rc1). Does it have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539116
--- Comment #10 from Antonio Trande ---
Please, post direct links to newest SPEC and SRPM (like
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/neteler/grass74/fedora-27-x86_64/00706613-grass/grass.spec,
we need them
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
Andrew Price changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anpr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #57 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
Hi ,
comment diff between specs 5.2.2 and 5.2.6
1 -
+# Small compile fix
Patch1: VirtualBox-5.0.18-xserver_guest.patch
yeah something happened and upstream doesn't do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970411
Steve changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ulat...@yahoo.com |needinfo-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964437
Steve changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506428
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Toskin ---
Cool, thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970416
Steve changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ulat...@yahoo.com |needinfo-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
--- Comment #13 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto ---
(In reply to Jan Pokorný from comment #11)
> I'll happily assign myself as a reviewer if there're no complaints.
>
> For a start, the spec is needlessly overcomplicated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539161
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539781
Bug ID: 1539781
Summary: Review Request: ghc-fail - Forward-compatible
MonadFail class
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539831
Bug ID: 1539831
Summary: Review Request: nheko - Desktop client for the Matrix
protocol
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
--- Comment #12 from digimer ---
Thanks!!
I'll work on a new RPM shortly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
--- Comment #14 from Jan Pokorný ---
re [comment 13]:
Mind that this is in the context of Fedora, OpenSUSE can have
conflicting guidelines and that's generally out of scope here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
--- Comment #15 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto ---
(In reply to Jan Pokorný from comment #14)
> re [comment 13]:
>
> Mind that this is in the context of Fedora, OpenSUSE can have
> conflicting guidelines and that's
49 matches
Mail list logo