https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647147
Bug ID: 1647147
Summary: Review Request: pmdk-convert - Conversion tool for
PMDK pools
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: high
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644719
--- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini ---
I'm not in a hurry, so I didn't want to push for finishing the review. Either
way, there was a successful compose a few hours ago, so that point is now moot
anyway :)
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646965
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646582
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645917
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647145
Bug ID: 1647145
Summary: Review Request: libpmemobj-cpp - C++ bindings for
libpmemobj
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: high
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629371
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot ---
Thanks for the review !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646795
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647147
Marcin Ślusarz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1488828
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647145
Marcin Ślusarz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1488828
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647145
Marcin Ślusarz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1634347
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647147
Marcin Ślusarz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1634347
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645922
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645294
--- Comment #10 from Derek Parker ---
Is there anyone reviewing the above request for `golang.org/x/arch`? Once that
is in and unblocks this package I'd love to move forward.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647009
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647254
--- Comment #2 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
Per
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#Package_Review_Process
, this doesn't require a review since it's a parallel-installable version of
existing libidn package.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640695
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
udica-0.1.1-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642736
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
--- Comment #13 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643266
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645367
--- Comment #2 from Link Dupont ---
Thanks. I've updated the Spec and SRPM.
Spec URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/linkdupont/public_git/rcm.git/plain/rcm.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~linkdupont/srpms/rcm-1.3.3-2.fc29.src.rpm
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647009
--- Comment #2 from Morten Stevens ---
Hi Robert-André,
Thanks for the quick review. I have uploaded the updated SPEC file and SRPM.
https://mstevens.fedorapeople.org/cacti-spine/cacti-spine.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848
--- Comment #9 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #8)
> > Can you please be more clear on what I'm missing here? Is it the addition of
> > -O3 to the flags? I've corrected that bit now, but you'll
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647254
--- Comment #1 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
This is an F29+ only package to support some third party applications linked
against libidn.so.11.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647254
Bug ID: 1647254
Summary: Review Request: libidn1.34 - Internationalized Domain
Name support library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647254
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647312
Bug ID: 1647312
Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-xSV - Read character
separated files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642736
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
python-leveldb-0.194-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638968
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643266
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
python-libNeuroML-0.2.45-5.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647311
Bug ID: 1647311
Summary: Review Request: perl-Plack-Middleware-Session -
Middleware for session management
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646965
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet ---
Thanks!
SCM requests
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8723
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8724
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8725
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848
--- Comment #11 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
(In reply to Artur Iwicki from comment #10)
> From what I've seen, libraries in Fedora usually are divided like this:
> - main package: stuff needed for running executables using the lib
> -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848
--- Comment #10 from Artur Iwicki ---
From what I've seen, libraries in Fedora usually are divided like this:
- main package: stuff needed for running executables using the lib
- devel: headers
- static: stuff needed for static compilation
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645340
Henrik Boeving changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624723
Henrik Boeving changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645768
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-duecredit-0.6.4-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641822
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645768
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1634957
--- Comment #25 from Raphael Groner ---
There's another issue. Enabled tests for python-requests run into "Connection
refused" errors. Investigating.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509679
--- Comment #11 from Jan Pokorný ---
Good catch about the license file, everything else looks good, just let
me do the final dive.
Re bundled libraries: if there are no versions to practically relate
to, I wouldn't do anything more on that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645922
--- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thanks for the review!
dist-git Repository request:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8721
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645917
--- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Thanks for the review, Robert!
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - Use %bcond_with/bcond_without for these:
These commands do not work on koji, so I don't find them
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645768
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-duecredit-0.6.4-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641822
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-goftp-server-0-0.1.20181105git1fd52c8.fc28 has been pushed to the
Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636757
--- Comment #13 from Tomas Mraz ---
Yes, see the contributor steps in:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645998
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636757
Dmitry Belyavskiy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645998
--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman ---
Thank you for the review, Jikta. I've requested the repo.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592952
Anatoli Babenia changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anat...@rainforce.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636111
--- Comment #24 from mati8...@gmail.com ---
> Can this be fixed?
>
> /builddir/build/BUILD/glyr/spec/capi/check_api.c:193:F:Init:test_glyr_download:0:
> Could not load www.google.de
OH..
I can make a patch to ignore this check, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646344
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848
--- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt ---
> Can you please be more clear on what I'm missing here? Is it the addition of
> -O3 to the flags? I've corrected that bit now, but you'll have to point out
> what else I'm missing, I'm afraid.
Yes,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848
--- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
(In reply to Manas Mangaonkar (Pac23) from comment #6)
> libb64.x86_64: - can you include a man page for the binary libb64-base64
Not really. Upstream doesn't provide one :(
> also a zero
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433784
Marek Skalický changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mskal...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646344
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646965
Bug ID: 1646965
Summary: Review Request: php-elvanto-litemoji - Conversion of
unicode, HTML and shortcode emoji
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509679
--- Comment #9 from Till Hofmann ---
Spec URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/rofi.spec
SRPM URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/rofi-1.5.1-2.fc28.src.rpm
- Move themes into a separate noarch sub-package
- Make doc sub-package noarch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647009
Bug ID: 1647009
Summary: Review Request: cacti-spine - High performance poller
for cacti
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509679
--- Comment #7 from Jan Pokorný ---
Just some debatable spots based on fedora-review results:
- can the bundled libraries be related to particular versions?
- does it make sense to put themes to a separate noarch subpackage?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509679
--- Comment #8 from Till Hofmann ---
(In reply to Jan Pokorný from comment #7)
> Just some debatable spots based on fedora-review results:
>
> - can the bundled libraries be related to particular versions?
Not really, as they do not have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509679
--- Comment #10 from Till Hofmann ---
Spec URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/rofi.spec
SRPM URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/rofi-1.5.1-3.fc28.src.rpm
I just realized I forgot the license file. Added it to all independently
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646344
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/earlyoom
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645998
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Data-ICal-DateTime
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629371
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646543
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
The license file is missing from the sources and the package.
Cf. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646543
--- Comment #3 from Till Hofmann ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #2)
> The license file is missing from the sources and the package.
>
> Cf. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
Thanks for
66 matches
Mail list logo
