https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
gnushogi-1.5-0.4.git5bb0b5b.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
gnushogi-1.5-0.4.git5bb0b5b.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
gnushogi-1.5-0.4.git5bb0b5b.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4cf89ccb28
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
gnushogi-1.5-0.4.git5bb0b5b.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-3e2d391d65
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #26 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnushogi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #24 from Chen Chen ---
Spec URL: https://github.com/aflyhorse/gnushogi-spec/raw/master/gnushogi.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.lunes.faith/SRPMS/gnushogi-1.5-0.4.git5bb0b5b.fc26.src.rpm
Koji URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #23 from Ben Rosser ---
> copr does not use koji at all. ;) Scratch builds in koji are similar to copr
> builds with the 'network access' turned off, but they aren't the exact same
> systems doing the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #22 from Chen Chen ---
Spec URL: https://github.com/aflyhorse/gnushogi-spec/raw/master/gnushogi.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.lunes.faith/SRPMS/gnushogi-1.5-0.3.git5bb0b5b.fc26.src.rpm
No sure why it wants to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Just a small drive by comment:
(In reply to Ben Rosser from comment #20)
> copr is fine for scratch builds these days (it uses Koji behind the scenes).
copr does not use koji at all. ;)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #20 from Ben Rosser ---
copr is fine for scratch builds these days (it uses Koji behind the scenes).
Just a note, generally it's good to run "rpmlint" over your package before
uploading (e.g. "rpmlint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #19 from Chen Chen ---
SPEC updated as per your suggestion.
SPEC (Same link, you can read the change in gist):
https://gist.github.com/aflyhorse/dc5f37bd72008315ac323f66b88ead1e
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rosser@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #17 from Chen Chen ---
I again decided to package the latest code (since it talks with xboard). Here
are the files:
SPEC:
https://gist.github.com/aflyhorse/dc5f37bd72008315ac323f66b88ead1e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #16 from Ben Rosser ---
> I'm still willing to package this game. Please let me have some time to catch
> up with the latest development and prepare a new SRPM.
Great to hear you are still interested! Just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
Chen Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(aflyhorse@hotmail |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
Yann Dirson ydir...@free.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ydir...@free.fr
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
Chen Chen aflyho...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #918089|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #10 from Chen Chen aflyho...@hotmail.com ---
Created attachment 918648
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=918648action=edit
gnushogi-1.4.2-1.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #11 from Chen Chen aflyho...@hotmail.com ---
Created attachment 918649
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=918649action=edit
xshogi.spec
The xshogi is the X-11 front-end of GNU Shogi.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
Chen Chen aflyho...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #918361|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #8 from Chen Chen aflyho...@hotmail.com ---
Created attachment 918361
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=918361action=edit
SRPM (3rd submit)
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7142468
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #2 from Chen Chen aflyho...@hotmail.com ---
Following the advice of upstream maintainer (Thanks Yann)
I made some update to the package. The links in the first post were unlinked
and here is the new version:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
The second spec is even worse than the initial submitted one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #4 from Chen Chen aflyho...@hotmail.com ---
Because I seperated my patch from the original git snapshot.
My patch involved tweaking the configure.ac, thus cause a full autoreconf in
%prep stage and pulled in a long list of build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
(In reply to Chen Chen from comment #4)
Because I seperated my patch from the original git snapshot.
You should use a released tarball from the official website, then rebase your
patch.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #6 from Chen Chen aflyho...@hotmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
(In reply to Chen Chen from comment #4)
Because I seperated my patch from the original git snapshot.
You should use a released tarball
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #7 from Chen Chen aflyho...@hotmail.com ---
Created attachment 918089
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=918089action=edit
3rd submit
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
Chen Chen aflyho...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #918089|3rd submit |gnushogi.spec (3rd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #1 from Chen Chen aflyho...@hotmail.com ---
Ouch, I forgot this etiquette:
this is my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
35 matches
Mail list logo