https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250025
Matej Mužila changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250025
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250025
--- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen ---
Can it be built for f26?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250025
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rocksdb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250025
Matej Mužila changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msch...@redhat.com |acari...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250025
Augusto Caringi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo+ |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250025
Augusto Caringi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(acaringi@redhat.c |needinfo+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250025
Matej Mužila changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250025
--- Comment #7 from Augusto Caringi ---
Package Review
==
MUST
* Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
There are 2 third-party libraries in the source tarball: gtest and fbson
gtest
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250025
--- Comment #6 from Augusto Caringi ---
The build time is unusual long given the size of the software... More than 6
minutes on my machine.
The cause is that the Makefile has a problem and as a consequence it doesn't
use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250025
Augusto Caringi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250025
--- Comment #4 from Matej Mužila ---
I've updated the package
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mmuzila/rocksdb/rocksdb.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~mmuzila/rocksdb/rocksdb-5.2.1-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250025
--- Comment #3 from Michal Schorm ---
Package Review
==
Here is the list of issues that MUST and SHOULD be fixed:
MUST
* Build flag %opt_flags missing and no justification present.
* Latest version is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250025
--- Comment #2 from Matej Mužila ---
I've updated the package
Spec URL: https://mmuzila.fedorapeople.org/rocksdb.spec
SRPM URL: https://mmuzila.fedorapeople.org/rocksdb-4.11-1.fc22.src.rpm
Description:
Rocksdb is a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250025
Honza Horak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|hho...@redhat.com |msch...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250025
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250025
--- Comment #1 from Honza Horak hho...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
I've spotted those issues, that should be fixed:
- soname is librocksdb.so.3.12, is this desired? I'd expect just
librocksdb.so.3, but maybe upstream decided
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250025
Honza Horak hho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hho...@redhat.com
18 matches
Mail list logo