[Bug 1268744] Review Request: rubygem-ast - A library for working with Abstract Syntax Trees

2020-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|

[Bug 1268744] Review Request: rubygem-ast - A library for working with Abstract Syntax Trees

2020-07-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattia.ve...@protonmail.com

[Bug 1268744] Review Request: rubygem-ast - A library for working with Abstract Syntax Trees

2020-04-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com --- Comment #8 from

[Bug 1268744] Review Request: rubygem-ast - A library for working with Abstract Syntax Trees

2020-04-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744 Bug 1268744 depends on bug 1268742, which changed state. Bug 1268742 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-bacon-colored_output - Colored output for Bacon test framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742 What

[Bug 1268744] Review Request: rubygem-ast - A library for working with Abstract Syntax Trees

2018-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744 Bugzilla account termination changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|rjo...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1268744] Review Request: rubygem-ast - A library for working with Abstract Syntax Trees

2017-12-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744 --- Comment #6 from Vít Ondruch --- (In reply to Ilya Gradina from comment #5) LGTM. Could you please ask for repository, import and build the package, since it was already approved by Roman previously? -- You are

[Bug 1268744] Review Request: rubygem-ast - A library for working with Abstract Syntax Trees

2017-12-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744 --- Comment #5 from Ilya Gradina --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #4) > Could you please consider removing the following build dependencies: > > BuildRequires: rubygem(bacon-colored_output) > BuildRequires:

[Bug 1268744] Review Request: rubygem-ast - A library for working with Abstract Syntax Trees

2017-11-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vondr...@redhat.com

[Bug 1268744] Review Request: rubygem-ast - A library for working with Abstract Syntax Trees

2017-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744 Roman Joost changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ---

[Bug 1268744] Review Request: rubygem-ast - A library for working with Abstract Syntax Trees

2017-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744 --- Comment #2 from Roman Joost --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === = MUST items = Generic:

[Bug 1268744] Review Request: rubygem-ast - A library for working with Abstract Syntax Trees

2017-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744 Roman Joost changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1268744] Review Request: rubygem-ast - A library for working with Abstract Syntax Trees

2016-09-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744 --- Comment #1 from Ilya Gradina --- New Spec: https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-ast.spec New SRPM:

[Bug 1268744] Review Request: rubygem-ast - A library for working with Abstract Syntax Trees

2015-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744 Ilya Gradina changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1268742

[Bug 1268744] Review Request: rubygem-ast - A library for working with Abstract Syntax Trees

2015-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744 Ilya Gradina changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1268745