[Bug 1268745] Review Request: rubygem-parser - A Ruby parser written in pure Ruby

2020-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745
Bug 1268745 depends on bug 1268744, which changed state.

Bug 1268744 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ast - A library for working with 
Abstract Syntax Trees
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1268745] Review Request: rubygem-parser - A Ruby parser written in pure Ruby

2017-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745

Roman Joost  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
  Flags|fedora-review?  |
Last Closed||2017-12-03 17:33:19



--- Comment #5 from Roman Joost  ---
Closing according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1268745] Review Request: rubygem-parser - A Ruby parser written in pure Ruby

2017-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745



--- Comment #6 from Roman Joost  ---
Closing according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1268745] Review Request: rubygem-parser - A Ruby parser written in pure Ruby

2017-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745

Roman Joost  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(ilya.gradina@gmai |
   |l.com)  |



--- Comment #4 from Roman Joost  ---
Package review stalled. No response.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1268745] Review Request: rubygem-parser - A Ruby parser written in pure Ruby

2017-08-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745

Roman Joost  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ilya.grad...@gmail.com
  Flags||needinfo?(ilya.gradina@gmai
   ||l.com)



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1268745] Review Request: rubygem-parser - A Ruby parser written in pure Ruby

2017-08-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745



--- Comment #3 from Roman Joost  ---
There is quite some stuff going in to the gem dir which I wonder is perhaps out
of your control. I also can't see any guidelines in the wiki. The only missing
piece from approving the package is perhaps that it hasn't packaged the latest
version. Do you want to maybe update the bug with the latest version and I go
over it again?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1268745] Review Request: rubygem-parser - A Ruby parser written in pure Ruby

2017-08-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745



--- Comment #2 from Roman Joost  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 104 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/rjoost/tmp/1268745-rubygem-parser/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gems,
 /usr/share/gems/doc
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Ruby:
[-]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir_mri}, platform
 independent under %{gem_dir}.
[x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage
[x]: Macro %{gem_extdir} is deprecated.
[x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name}
[x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel.
[x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro.
[x]: Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch
[x]: Package does not contain Requires: ruby(abi).

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
 Note: Package contains font files
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rubygem-
 parser-doc
[x]: Package functions as described.
[-]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
   

[Bug 1268745] Review Request: rubygem-parser - A Ruby parser written in pure Ruby

2017-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745

Roman Joost  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1268745] Review Request: rubygem-parser - A Ruby parser written in pure Ruby

2017-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745

Roman Joost  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rjo...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rjo...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1268745] Review Request: rubygem-parser - A Ruby parser written in pure Ruby

2016-09-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745



--- Comment #1 from Ilya Gradina  ---
New Spec:
https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-parser.spec
New SRPM:
https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-parser-2.3.1.2-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1268745] Review Request: rubygem-parser - A Ruby parser written in pure Ruby

2016-09-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745

Ilya Gradina  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1268758




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268758
[Bug 1268758] Review Request: rubygem-rubocop - Automatic Ruby code style
checking tool
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1268745] Review Request: rubygem-parser - A Ruby parser written in pure Ruby

2015-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745

Ilya Gradina  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1268744




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744
[Bug 1268744] Review Request: rubygem-ast - A library for working with
Abstract Syntax Trees
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1268745] Review Request: rubygem-parser - A Ruby parser written in pure Ruby

2015-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745

Ilya Gradina  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1268753




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268753
[Bug 1268753] Review Request: rubygem-astrolabe - An object-oriented AST
extension for Parser
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review