[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #79 from Fedora Update System --- tpm2-tss-1.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #78 from Fedora Update System --- tpm2-tss-1.0-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #76 from Yunying Sun --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #75) > Yes. The time to wait changes after a release. It is 3 days (+rel-eng > delays) during prerelease-phases and 7 days (+rel-eng delays)

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #75 from Ralf Corsepius --- (In reply to Yunying Sun from comment #74) > That's in Oct. Has the wait days been extended to 7 days recently? Yes. The time to wait changes after a release. It is 3 days (+rel-eng

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #74 from Yunying Sun --- (In reply to Jason Tibbitts from comment #73) > Without karma, a Fedora update must stay in testing for seven days. An EPEL > update must stay in testing for fourteen days. > > Of

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #73 from Jason Tibbitts --- Without karma, a Fedora update must stay in testing for seven days. An EPEL update must stay in testing for fourteen days. Of course, if you can get three positive test results on

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #72 from Yunying Sun --- It has been more than 4 days since the updates for this package been pushed to f25 & epel7 testing, but no update till now:

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #71 from Fedora Update System --- tpm2-tss-1.0-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #69 from Yunying Sun --- SPEC & source tarball have been imported to SCM: https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/tpm2-tss.git Build completed for master/f25/epel7:

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #68 from Fedora Update System --- tpm2-tss-1.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-22cc02f80e -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #67 from Fedora Update System --- tpm2-tss-1.0-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a49b0a42ea -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #66 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/tpm2-tss -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #65 from Yunying Sun --- Thanks Dan, really appreciate the approval and sponsoring. I've created the new package request. "fedpkg clone" currently fails with error "Could not read from remote repository".

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ---

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #63 from Yunying Sun --- > > Questions left: > > 1. > N/A*%check is present and all tests pass. > > Is the %check section a MUST? > > it's a SHOULD >

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #62 from Dan Horák --- (In reply to Yunying Sun from comment #61) > (In reply to Dan Horák from comment #60) > > formal review is here, see the notes explaining OK* and BAD statuses below: > > ... > > So almost

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #61 from Yunying Sun --- (In reply to Dan Horák from comment #60) > formal review is here, see the notes explaining OK* and BAD statuses below: > ... > So almost good, but please answer my question (and/or

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #60 from Dan Horák --- formal review is here, see the notes explaining OK* and BAD statuses below: OK source files match upstream: c610fa5273909394fa54174afcd7541a5c87d16b TPM2.0-TSS-1.0.tar.gz OK

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|fed...@besser82.io |d...@danny.cz --- Comment

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #58 from Gang Wei --- (In reply to Yunying Sun from comment #55) > (In reply to Josh Boyer from comment #54) > > (In reply to Dan Horák from comment #53) > > > Isn't this request a duplicate of > > >

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #57 from Jerry Snitselaar --- Looking to the future and RHEL, I noticed when taking a look autoconf-archive and libcmocka are only available in EPEL. The autoconf-archive was just using the pthread macro, so

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #56 from Dan Horák --- (In reply to Yunying Sun from comment #55) > (In reply to Josh Boyer from comment #54) > > (In reply to Dan Horák from comment #53) > > > Isn't this request a duplicate of > > >

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Yunying Sun changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(fedora@besser82.i |

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Josh Boyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsnit...@redhat.com

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yunying@intel.com

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #53 from Dan Horák --- Isn't this request a duplicate of https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/tss2/ ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Don Bayly changed: What|Removed |Added Group|qa | -- You are

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #52 from Dan Horák --- Björn, are you going to continue with the review here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Josh Boyer changed: What|Removed |Added Group|devel | -- You are

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Don Bayly changed: What|Removed |Added Group|intel | -- You are

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #51 from Yunying Sun --- Regarding some of the rpmlint warnings: > tpm2-tss.src: W: invalid-license TCGL TCGL license has been added to the Fedora license list by Tom, see comment 43. tpm2-tss.src: W:

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #50 from Yunying Sun --- (running fedora-review on this package myself) Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Don Bayly changed: What|Removed |Added Group||intel

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #49 from Yunying Sun --- (In reply to Björn "besser82" Esser from comment #42) > Created attachment 1214569 [details] > License-file contained in upstream-tarball > > Well, the license-file shipped with the

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #48 from Yunying Sun --- More reviews are done on 1395522, 1394789, 1399648, 1398922. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #47 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #45) > Please follow the official process to get sponsored as a packager: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #46 from yunying@intel.com --- Upstream has released 1.0 at Nov 3 2016: https://github.com/01org/TPM2.0-TSS/releases I updated this package to 1.0 upstream as well, to make sure this package is up to date. Updated SPEC:

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Janet Morgan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1275027 --

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #44 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #43) > I just added the TCGL to the Fedora license list. It is Free and GPL > compatible, but only when applied to source code. When applied to >

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Björn "besser82" Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #42 from Björn "besser82" Esser --- Created attachment 1214569 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1214569=edit License-file contained in upstream-tarball Well, the license-file shipped with

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Björn "besser82" Esser changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #41 from yunying@intel.com --- Hi everyone, this is my first package, and after some reviews and updates, it has been quiet for some days. Could someone kindly help with further review, approve and sponsor? Thanks in advance.

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #40 from l...@us.ibm.com --- (In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #39) > (In reply to lo1 from comment #38) > > Previusly, as I saw Yunying's koji and copr output built fine in the > > rawhide, I did a little digging and found

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #39 from Orion Poplawski --- (In reply to lo1 from comment #38) > Previusly, as I saw Yunying's koji and copr output built fine in the > rawhide, I did a little digging and found that gcc and gcc-c++ are the >

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #38 from l...@us.ibm.com --- (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #35) > (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #31) > > (In reply to lo1 from comment #30) > > > Changelog needs to be updated every time you make changes: > > >

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #37 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #35) > (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #31) > > (In reply to lo1 from comment #30) > All BuildRequires must be specified. Even gcc/gcc-c++. gcc

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #36 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #35) > (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #31) > > (In reply to lo1 from comment #30) > All BuildRequires must be specified. Even gcc/gcc-c++. @Igor,

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #35 from Igor Gnatenko --- (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #31) > (In reply to lo1 from comment #30) > > Changelog needs to be updated every time you make changes: > >

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #34 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to lo1 from comment #32) > (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #31) > > (In reply to lo1 from comment #30) > By the way, the format of the changelog, > in particular the

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #33 from l...@us.ibm.com --- > No, I dont think the Fedora 24 local build is mandatory. Sorry, I totally > ignored the koji and copr for some reasons. To clarify, Koji and Copr build > would be more appropriate and "clean" as my

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #32 from l...@us.ibm.com --- (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #31) > (In reply to lo1 from comment #30) > > Changelog needs to be updated every time you make changes: > >

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #31 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to lo1 from comment #30) > Changelog needs to be updated every time you make changes: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/ > Guidelines#Changelogs >

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 l...@us.ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@us.ibm.com --- Comment #30

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #29 from yunying@intel.com --- Fixed a typo in ExcludeArch list. Updated SPEC: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yunyings/share/master/tpm2-tss.spec Updated SRPMS:

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #28 from yunying@intel.com --- @Igor, Ralf, Dmitrij, Orion, could you kindly help to review this package again? Any comments would be appreciated. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #27 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #26) > You don't need the silly rename-tarball_tss.sh script (which would need be > changed with each release anyway). Preferred mechanism is in >

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #25 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich from comment #24) > I meant this: > > $ md5sum tpm2-tss-1.0.tar.gz 1.0-beta_1.tar.gz > 2cdda79640f1e2e534ff897480190686 tpm2-tss-1.0.tar.gz >

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #24 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich --- I meant this: $ md5sum tpm2-tss-1.0.tar.gz 1.0-beta_1.tar.gz 2cdda79640f1e2e534ff897480190686 tpm2-tss-1.0.tar.gz 3d6df831cee731d95ef754f6599b3a6c 1.0-beta_1.tar.gz

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #23 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich from comment #22) > There is no way to get sources via URL in Source0 tag. Moreover, sources in > src.rpm differs from upstream. Thanks for reminding, Dmitrij.

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #22 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich --- There is no way to get sources via URL in Source0 tag. Moreover, sources in src.rpm differs from upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #21 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #20) > (In reply to Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich from comment #18) > > There are still *.la files in -devel. They must not be included. > *.la removed from SPEC. > >

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #20 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich from comment #18) > There are still *.la files in -devel. They must not be included. *.la removed from SPEC. > > Trusted Platform Module *could* be installed

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #19 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich --- In addition: and src.rpm too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #17 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #16) > (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #13) > > (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #12) > > > Could you help to review again? > > > > Here we go:

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #16 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #13) > (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #12) > > Could you help to review again? > > Here we go: > > - Please append --disable-silent-rules to

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #15 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #13) > (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #12) > > Could you help to review again? > > Here we go: > > - Please append --disable-silent-rules to

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #14 from Ralf Corsepius --- Created attachment 1197361 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1197361=edit Patch to tpm2-tss.spec as announced in comment#13 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #13 from Ralf Corsepius --- (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #12) > Could you help to review again? Here we go: - Please append --disable-silent-rules to %configure This enforces verbose building,

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #12 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #11) > (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #9) > > > Yes, tpm2-tools.srpm fails to build due to missing BuildRequires for package > > "tpm2-tss" &

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 yunying@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1369720 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #11 from Ralf Corsepius --- (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #9) > Yes, tpm2-tools.srpm fails to build due to missing BuildRequires for package > "tpm2-tss" & "tpm2-tss-devel". > To make tpm2-tools koji

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #10 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #8) > (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #4) > > the configure error "cannot run C compiled programs" is there, seems because > > "%configure" adds an

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #9 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #8) > (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #4) > > the configure error "cannot run C compiled programs" is there, seems because > > "%configure" adds an

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #7 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #6) > (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #5) > > (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #4) > > > the configure error "cannot run C compiled programs" is

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #6 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #5) > (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #4) > > the configure error "cannot run C compiled programs" is there, seems because > > "%configure" adds an

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #5 from Igor Gnatenko --- (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #4) > the configure error "cannot run C compiled programs" is there, seems because > "%configure" adds an extra flag "-Werror" to CFLAGS, which

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #4 from yunying@intel.com --- the configure error "cannot run C compiled programs" is there, seems because "%configure" adds an extra flag "-Werror" to CFLAGS, which turns some config warnings to errors. With "./configure",

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #3 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #1) > > BuildRequires: pkgconfig > > BuildRequires: libcmocka-devel > BuildRequires: pkgconfig(cmocka) > > > CONFIG_SITE=$(pwd)/lib/default_config.site

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #2 from yunying@intel.com --- (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #1) > > BuildRequires: pkgconfig > > BuildRequires: libcmocka-devel > BuildRequires: pkgconfig(cmocka) > > > CONFIG_SITE=$(pwd)/lib/default_config.site

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko --- > BuildRequires: pkgconfig > BuildRequires: libcmocka-devel BuildRequires: pkgconfig(cmocka) > CONFIG_SITE=$(pwd)/lib/default_config.site ./configure export

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 yunying@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)