[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED

[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/bitstream -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #9) > maybe you should update license field, if mpeg/psi/psi.h is under MIT > (style) license Right, I've lost this change

[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436 --- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo --- maybe you should update license field, if mpeg/psi/psi.h is under MIT (style) license -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST

[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/bitstream.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/bitstream-1.1-2.fc26.src.rpm Description: Simpler access to binary structures

[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436 --- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo --- (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #4) > [!]: Development files must be in a -devel package > Maybe should be change "Provides: %{name}-devel = > %{version}-%{release}" in

[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436 --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo --- NON blocking issues: "Group:" fields are no more necessary. Please remove -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about

[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo --- Issues: - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: bitstream : /usr/include/bitstream/atsc/a52.h bitstream : /usr/include/bitstream/common.h bitstream :

[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436 --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - Header files in -devel

[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You

[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it

[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- Blocked FE-Legal because the header contains structures related to possibly patented format. I expect it's more around mux than codec, but need to be confirmed. Also there

[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||182235

[Bug 1376436] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG , DVB, IETF

2016-09-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1376438