[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-12-09 19:25:53 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e0885fdb1f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3ee549515d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-08051f4718 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-0a8ccddbbc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-0a8ccddbbc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-08051f4718 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e0885fdb1f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3ee549515d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Module-Extract-Use -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar --- URL Source addresses are usable. Ok. Source archive is original (SHA-256: b2dba019d5dfde41217f10cfdc20ebd46c3deee00accef37097f1bf2597f5c9a). Ok. Summary verified from lib/Module/Extract/Use.pm. Ok. Description verified from lib/Module/Extract/Use.pm. OK. License verified from lib/Module/Extract/Use.pm, examples/extract_modules, LICENSE. Ok. No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok. Test::Manifest is not helpful. Ok. Build-requires are Ok. All test pass. Ok. $ rpmlint perl-Module-Extract-Use.spec ../SRPMS/perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.fc26.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.fc26.noarch.rpm perl-Module-Extract-Use.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eval -> veal, vela, val perl-Module-Extract-Use.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pragmas -> pragmatism perl-Module-Extract-Use.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eval -> veal, vela, val perl-Module-Extract-Use.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pragmas -> pragmatism 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. rpmlint is Ok. $ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.fc26.noarch.rpm drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Nov 28 11:02 /usr/share/doc/perl-Module-Extract-Use -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1329 Jan 4 2014 /usr/share/doc/perl-Module-Extract-Use/Changes -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 477 Jan 4 2014 /usr/share/doc/perl-Module-Extract-Use/README drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Nov 28 11:02 /usr/share/doc/perl-Module-Extract-Use/examples -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2234 Jan 4 2014 /usr/share/doc/perl-Module-Extract-Use/examples/extract_modules drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Nov 28 11:02 /usr/share/licenses/perl-Module-Extract-Use -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 69 Jan 4 2014 /usr/share/licenses/perl-Module-Extract-Use/LICENSE -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2246 Nov 28 11:02 /usr/share/man/man3/Module::Extract::Use.3pm.gz drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Nov 28 11:02 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Module drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Nov 28 11:02 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Module/Extract -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 4847 Jan 4 2014 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Module/Extract/Use.pm File layout and permission are Ok. $ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.fc26.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.0) 1 perl(PPI) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(subs) 1 perl(vars) 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.fc26.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 1 perl(Module::Extract::Use) = 1.04 1 perl-Module-Extract-Use = 1.04-2.fc26 The private Module::Extract::Use::Item module not provides. Binary provides are Ok. $ resolvedeps rawhide ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.fc26.noarch.rpm Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok. Package builds in F26 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16655383). Ok. The package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines. Resolution: Package APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #2) > Hi Fabio, > > (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #1) > > = > > | !! NON-BINDING !! | > > | Package Review | > > = > > > > I did this preliminary package review as part of the process of > > becoming a fedora packager, so a "real" review is still needed. > > > > IMO, besides the unneccessary BuildRequires, the review > > looks simple enough. Regardless, a link to a successful koji > > scratch build would have been nice. > > OK, here's a scratch build: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16647335 > Looks good! > > Issues: > > === > > - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that > > are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. > > > > Note: These BR are not needed: coreutils make findutils > > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 > > It looks like this comment is a remnant from an old version of the packaging > guidlines, which now say: > > It is important that your package list all necessary build dependencies > using the BuildRequires: tag. You may assume that enough of an environment > exists for RPM to function, to build packages and execute basic shell > scripts, but you should not assume any other packages are present as RPM > dependencies and anything brought into the buildroot by the build system may > change over time. > > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/ > Guidelines#BuildRequires_2) > > So I think it is safest to include everything that is explicitly used during > the package build. Fair point, I did assume that fedora-review was up to snuff with the latest packaging guidelines concerning this - obviously, I was wrong. > > Reviewer's Comment: The first 32 lines of the .spec file are not nicely > > formatted at all (indentation with 8-space-tabs instead of simple spaces, no > > empty lines for better readability, etc.) - although it seems that the > > .spec file has been adapted from another package or a Perl package template, > > because many already existing / approved perl package .specs look that way. > > This one is a matter of personal taste really and there are no guidelines > about use of tabs, unless the use resulted in the spec not being legible to > read. I think blocking on use of regular 8-space tabs (which I find helps > line things up easily) would be stretching things a bit. Of course. I just wanted to mention it as "comment only", because - depending on the text editor configuration or environment - your .spec file might not look as intended. > Thanks for the feedback. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth --- Hi Fabio, (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #1) > = > | !! NON-BINDING !! | > | Package Review | > = > > I did this preliminary package review as part of the process of > becoming a fedora packager, so a "real" review is still needed. > > IMO, besides the unneccessary BuildRequires, the review > looks simple enough. Regardless, a link to a successful koji > scratch build would have been nice. OK, here's a scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16647335 > Issues: > === > - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that > are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. > > Note: These BR are not needed: coreutils make findutils > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 It looks like this comment is a remnant from an old version of the packaging guidlines, which now say: It is important that your package list all necessary build dependencies using the BuildRequires: tag. You may assume that enough of an environment exists for RPM to function, to build packages and execute basic shell scripts, but you should not assume any other packages are present as RPM dependencies and anything brought into the buildroot by the build system may change over time. (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRequires_2) So I think it is safest to include everything that is explicitly used during the package build. > Reviewer's Comment: The first 32 lines of the .spec file are not nicely > formatted at all (indentation with 8-space-tabs instead of simple spaces, no > empty lines for better readability, etc.) - although it seems that the > .spec file has been adapted from another package or a Perl package template, > because many already existing / approved perl package .specs look that way. This one is a matter of personal taste really and there are no guidelines about use of tabs, unless the use resulted in the spec not being legible to read. I think blocking on use of regular 8-space tabs (which I find helps line things up easily) would be stretching things a bit. Thanks for the feedback. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini ---
=
| !! NON-BINDING !! |
| Package Review |
=
I did this preliminary package review as part of the process of
becoming a fedora packager, so a "real" review is still needed.
IMO, besides the unneccessary BuildRequires, the review
looks simple enough. Regardless, a link to a successful koji
scratch build would have been nice.
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Note: These BR are not needed: coreutils make findutils
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
Reviewer's Comment: The first 32 lines of the .spec file are not nicely
formatted at all (indentation with 8-space-tabs instead of simple spaces, no
empty lines for better readability, etc.) - although it seems that the
.spec file has been adapted from another package or a Perl package template,
because many already existing / approved perl package .specs look that way.
= MUST items =
Generic:
[X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[X]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
licenses manually.
[-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[X]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Module/Extract(perl-Module-Extract-
VERSION, perl-Module-Extract-Namespaces),
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Module(perl-Module-Implementation, perl-
Module-Runtime)
[X]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[X]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[X]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[?]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[X]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[X]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[X]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[X]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[X]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[X]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files.
[X]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Perl:
[X]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
[X]: CPAN urls should be non-versioned.
[Bug 1398690] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Use - Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1398309 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398309 [Bug 1398309] perl-Test-Prereq-2.002 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
