[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 Benjamin Kircher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 Michal Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 --- Comment #20 from Benjamin Kircher --- Thanks, Dridi. > Don't forget to find a sponsor in the mean time. I'll do my best :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 --- Comment #19 from Dridi Boukelmoune --- I have some packaging work ahead, I'll have a look at your update then. Don't forget to find a sponsor in the mean time. Maybe I can do the formal review, but I can't approve

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 --- Comment #18 from Benjamin Kircher --- Thanks Dridi for your work. New upstream version contains your changes so no need to patch. Changes: - New upstream release 0.7 - Use %configure macro - Do verbose build

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 Dridi Boukelmoune changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 --- Comment #16 from Benjamin Kircher --- FYI, some changes related to ./configure script and Fedora packaging happened in upstream here: https://github.com/namhyung/uftrace/pull/98 Not in a release yet, though.

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 --- Comment #15 from Benjamin Kircher --- A copr repository is available here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bkircher/uftrace/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 --- Comment #14 from Benjamin Kircher --- New upstream version. New SPEC file: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bkircher/uftrace-fedora/master/uftrace.spec New SRPM:

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 --- Comment #13 from Benjamin Kircher --- Sorry for letting this lie around for 9 weeks. > About GPLv2 or GPLv2+ You're right. It is GPLv2. Author confirmed this. > 1) These BR are not needed: gcc BR removed. >

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 --- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt --- The fedora-review tool is equally helpful to the package maintainer as to the reviewer. About GPLv2 or GPLv2+, a simple grep turns up these false positives: $ grep "or

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 --- Comment #11 from Benjamin Kircher --- Hi Michael. Thank you for looking into this. > > * I think license is GPLv2+, not GPLv2 > > It's useless to write that without giving a rationale. > > Have you pointed

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 --- Comment #10 from Benjamin Kircher --- New SPEC file: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bkircher/uftrace-fedora/master/uftrace.spec New SRPM:

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 --- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt --- > * I think license is GPLv2+, not GPLv2 It's useless to write that without giving a rationale. Have you pointed "fedora-review -b 1398922" at this ticket yet to see which test

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 --- Comment #8 from Benjamin Kircher --- Thank you. > * ./configure -> %configure > Usually, but unfortunately it's not the case right now. Correct, configure is a shell script here. > Main problem is that

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 --- Comment #6 from Benjamin Kircher --- FYI, a link to a 6 minute lightning talk by the author about uftrace: https://youtu.be/LNav5qvyK7I -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 --- Comment #5 from Benjamin Kircher --- > Sorry, as a new packager myself, I misunderstood the rules about .so files. Oh, no problem. The question what these libraries are doing is quite justified. -- You are

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 --- Comment #4 from Yunying Sun --- (In reply to Benjamin Kircher from comment #2) > Thank you. > > > 1. No version specified in %changelog. > Fixed. > > > Static libraries are discouraged. Add "--disable-static" in

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 --- Comment #3 from Benjamin Kircher --- I was able to talk to the author of uftrace about those libs. The libmcount* libraries are linked into the target process (using LD_PRELOAD) rather than uftrace itself. They

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 --- Comment #2 from Benjamin Kircher --- Thank you. > 1. No version specified in %changelog. Fixed. > Static libraries are discouraged. Add "--disable-static" in %configure, and > add -devel package where *.so

[Bug 1398922] Review Request: uftrace - User-space function call tracer for C and C++ programs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 Yunying Sun changed: What|Removed |Added CC|