[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|505154 (FE-SCITECH) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 [Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- libefp-1.5.0-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2JW6T5FHY4C4GVQIOY7F5BEK3XOYTOBW/
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- libefp-1.5.0-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-05-14 13:53:44 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- libefp-1.5.0-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- libefp-1.5.0-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e7f0d10a09 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- libefp-1.5.0-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f6815cd48a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- libefp-1.5.0-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-48d82d4b4b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- libefp-1.5.0-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-48d82d4b4b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- libefp-1.5.0-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e7f0d10a09 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- libefp-1.5.0-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f6815cd48a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 --- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libefp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 --- Comment #9 from Susi Lehtola --- Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Antonio Trande --- Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 --- Comment #7 from Susi Lehtola --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #6) > Package Review > == > > Legend: > [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated > [ ] = Manual review needed > > > Issues: > === > - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. > Note: libefp-debugsource : > /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/balance.h libefp- > debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/clapack.h > libefp-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/efp.h > libefp-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/elec.h > libefp-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/int.h > libefp-debugsource : > /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/intshift.h libefp- > debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/log.h libefp- > debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/mathutil.h > libefp-debugsource : > /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/private.h libefp- > debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/stream.h > libefp-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/swf.h > libefp-debugsource : > /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/terms.h libefp-debugsource > : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/util.h > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages Not an issue, because those are in the *debug source tarball*. They are *not* installed. > - Use new ldconfig scriptlet Done. > - Why tests are not performed? > (You need to compile the EFPMD program: > https://github.com/ilyak/libefp#efpmd) CMakeLists.txt says: # Notes on CMake: CMake builds libefp, the shared or static library, # but not efpmd because Psi4 doesn't use it. Also not implemented # is testing with CTest. Also, when libefp is # compiled statically with OpenMP, will need to compile consuming # application with OpenMP, too, or supply link library. Per request, I have switched to using the Makefile. > - You can activate OpenMP/MPI parallelization too. > Are you not interested about? OpenMP activated. MPI is too much of a hassle for my needs. > - BLAS library is not detected: > > ... > -- Found Threads: TRUE > -- A library with BLAS API not found. Please specify library location. > -- LAPACK requires BLAS > -- LAPACK detected. > -- Found TargetLAPACK: Found LAPACK: > ... > > - libefp.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libefp.so.1.5 ... > > Probably, 'undefined-non-weak-symbol' are there for missing linkage to the > BLAS library. I don't want to link to a BLAS library, because there are multiple possible BLAS libraries that can be used on Fedora. It's better to leave the choice to the linking packages. Otherwise it's a big mess to make sure you're actually using the library you want. This is the same way e.g. the GSL library is packaged: the BLAS library is chosen by the user at link time. ** Spec URL: https://jussilehtola.fedorapeople.org/libefp.spec SRPM URL: https://jussilehtola.fedorapeople.org/libefp-1.5.0-2.fc27.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 --- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: libefp-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/balance.h libefp- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/clapack.h libefp-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/efp.h libefp-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/elec.h libefp-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/int.h libefp-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/intshift.h libefp- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/log.h libefp- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/mathutil.h libefp-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/private.h libefp- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/stream.h libefp-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/swf.h libefp-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/terms.h libefp-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64/src/util.h See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages - Use new ldconfig scriptlet - Why tests are not performed? (You need to compile the EFPMD program: https://github.com/ilyak/libefp#efpmd) - You can activate OpenMP/MPI parallelization too. Are you not interested about? - BLAS library is not detected: ... -- Found Threads: TRUE -- A library with BLAS API not found. Please specify library location. -- LAPACK requires BLAS -- LAPACK detected. -- Found TargetLAPACK: Found LAPACK: ... - libefp.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libefp.so.1.5 ... Probably, 'undefined-non-weak-symbol' are there for missing linkage to the BLAS library. = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (3 clause)", "BSD (2 clause)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* BSD (unspecified)". 141 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/sagitter/1419379-libefp/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packagin
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|AwaitingSubmitter, NotReady | --- Comment #5 from Susi Lehtola --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #4) > Please, update your src package to latest version. I did it already once above per request. It's not a MUST. However, re-updated spec and srpm at Spec URL: https://jussilehtola.fedorapeople.org/libefp.spec SRPM URL: https://jussilehtola.fedorapeople.org/libefp-1.5.0-1.fc27.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(susi.lehtola@iki. | |fi) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added CC||susi.leht...@iki.fi Whiteboard||AwaitingSubmitter, NotReady Flags||needinfo?(susi.lehtola@iki. ||fi) --- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande --- Please, update your src package to latest version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|anto.tra...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 --- Comment #3 from Susi Lehtola --- Updated spec and srpm at Spec URL: https://jussilehtola.fedorapeople.org/libefp.spec SRPM URL: https://jussilehtola.fedorapeople.org/libefp-1.4.2-1.fc26.src.rpm Filed ticket about versioning upstream at https://github.com/ilyak/libefp/issues/10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Hello,
- Please update to the latest version, 1.4.2.
- Please use a more meaningful name for your archive, with:
Source0:
https://github.com/ilyak/libefp/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
- Please don't mix spaces and tabs (line 7). Choose one on the other.
- The library should be versioned:
>In cases where upstream ships unversioned .so library (so this is not needed
>for
>plugins, drivers, etc.), the packager MUST try to convince upstream to start
>versioning it.
>
>If that fails due to unwilling or unresposive upstream, the packager may start
>versioning downstream but this must be done with caution and ideally only in
>rare cases. We don't want to create a library that could conflict with
>upstream
>if they later start providing versioned shared libraries. Under no
>circumstances
>should the unversioned library be shipped in Fedora.
See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Downstream_.so_name_versioning
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 --- Comment #1 from Susi Lehtola --- This package adds functionality to the psi4 package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1419365 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419365 [Bug 1419365] Update psi4 to next release -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||505154 (FE-SCITECH) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 [Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1419365 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419365 [Bug 1419365] Update psi4 to next release -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
