[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android-fr

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Wim Taymans changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: fdk-aac - |Review Request: fdk-aac -

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #99 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- I will let the task to sort out what works and does not with this particular implementation on the gstreamer side, as only gstreamer will consume this library within Fedora as I expect. For

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #98 from Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #97) > (In reply to Wim Taymans from comment #95) > ... > > Can you re-approve the bug again? > Once again. I would not approve

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #97 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- (In reply to Wim Taymans from comment #95) ... > Can you re-approve the bug again? Once again. I would not approve this unless the package is named fdk-aac-free to denote the incompleteness

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ---

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #95 from Wim Taymans --- (In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #94) > (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #93) > > Done, sorry for the delay. > > Wim, are you going to request the repo again? Can you

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #94 from Yaakov Selkowitz --- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #93) > Done, sorry for the delay. Wim, are you going to request the repo again? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #93 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Done, sorry for the delay. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #92 from Wim Taymans --- Request for new repo is denied: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/6760 Dominik, can you approve this bug? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #91 from Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller --- (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #88) > The thing is, this kind of transitory approval: > > (quoting Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #75) > > If the FSF

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #90 from Yaakov Selkowitz --- (In reply to Wim Taymans from comment #82) > $ fedpkg --module-name fdk-aac request-repo 1501522 > Could not execute request_repo: The Bugzilla bug's review was approved over > 60

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Yaakov Selkowitz changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Yaakov Selkowitz changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #89 from Michael Catanzaro --- It has nothing to do with RHEL... the goal is to get AAC support into Fedora so that GStreamer can play MP4 videos. The other half of the effort will be enhancing OpenH264 to

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #88 from Kevin Kofler --- The thing is, this kind of transitory approval: (quoting Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #75) > If the FSF provides clarity, I will add it to this ticket. Obviously, if > they

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #87 from Michael Catanzaro --- We can't block indefinitely on the FSF. Since they can't provide us with a timeline in which we can expect an answer, it's time to proceed. It's also not appropriate to ask

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #86 from Kevin Kofler --- What I would like to see is 1. an answer from the FSF, and then, depending on the answer: 2. a. if the FSF considers the license non-free, this review request dropped, OR 2. b. if

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Kevin Kofler changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #84 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- (In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #81) ... > Put it simply it's RF who is the second class citizen here, not the other > way around. So it's a RF maintainer's duty

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #83 from Peter Robinson --- > What now? The reviewer can probably un-set and re-set the review + flag -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #82 from Wim Taymans --- $ fedpkg --module-name fdk-aac request-repo 1501522 Could not execute request_repo: The Bugzilla bug's review was approved over 60 days ago What now? -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #81 from Peter Lemenkov --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #78) > (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #77) > > (In reply to Itamar Reis Peixoto from comment #76) > > > let's

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) | --- Comment

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #79 from Kevin Kofler --- (In reply to Itamar Reis Peixoto from comment #76) > let's move on, please request the repo using -> > > $ fedpkg --module-name fdk-aac request-repo 1501522 Please don't. I put

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #78 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #77) > (In reply to Itamar Reis Peixoto from comment #76) > > let's move on, please request the repo using -> > > > >

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #77 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- (In reply to Itamar Reis Peixoto from comment #76) > let's move on, please request the repo using -> > > $ fedpkg --module-name fdk-aac request-repo 1501522 Would you

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Kevin Kofler changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(tcallawa@redhat.c |

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #74 from Yaakov Selkowitz --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #72) > You are not changing anything to the copyright if the patent is expunged > from the library. So, the library still has

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #73 from Kevin Kofler --- > It was re-added in comment #54, but I see no actual legal questions there: > only > technical objections. Comment #52 is a legal question. It is definitely not technical. --

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #72 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- Just for been clear. The original problem with fdk-aac was never about patent (at least on the 3rd party level). It's all about copyright. You are not changing anything to

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Michael Catanzaro changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) | ---

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #70 from Kevin Fenzi --- (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #69) > > Both Legal and FESCo have approved this; can we please move this forward? > > Again, we still do not have the answer from the FSF promised

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Kevin Kofler changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #69 from Kevin Kofler --- > Both Legal and FESCo have approved this; can we please move this forward? Again, we still do not have the answer from the FSF promised in comment #52. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #68 from Kevin Fenzi --- (In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #67) > Both Legal and FESCo have approved this; can we please move this forward? The submittor just needs to use fedpkg request-repo (see fedpkg

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #67 from Yaakov Selkowitz --- Both Legal and FESCo have approved this; can we please move this forward? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #66 from Kevin Kofler --- My point is that we should wait for what they actually say instead of assuming things. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #65 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #61) [...] > The problem is that the third-party repository was previously shipping a > different codec, the built-in one

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #64 from David Vásquez --- (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #63) > The problem is that GStreamer will end up using fdk-aac (through some plugin > that Fedora is going to ship) instead of FFmpeg

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #63 from Kevin Kofler --- The problem is that GStreamer will end up using fdk-aac (through some plugin that Fedora is going to ship) instead of FFmpeg (through gstreamer1-libav). -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #62 from David Vásquez --- (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #61) > (In reply to David Vásquez from comment #59) > > If fdk-aac was approved, then welcome (I will give positive karma here). The > >

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #61 from Kevin Kofler --- (In reply to David Vásquez from comment #59) > If fdk-aac was approved, then welcome (I will give positive karma here). The > world is changing, and we must adapt. The user must

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #60 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #57) > We still don't know the outcome of comment #52 (license review by the FSF). That's irrelevant. RH legal already

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #59 from David Vásquez --- If fdk-aac was approved, then welcome (I will give positive karma here). The world is changing, and we must adapt. The user must choose; then we need give the user the options.

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #58 from leigh scott --- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #56) > I also assume Wim will co-maintain the corresponding RPMFusion package or at > least coordinate with its

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #57 from Kevin Kofler --- We still don't know the outcome of comment #52 (license review by the FSF). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review-

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #55 from Michael Catanzaro --- FE-Legal has already approved this package. Do you have a specific question for them? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #53 from Yaakov Selkowitz --- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #51) > Well, even if I reject this, you could always find another reviewer, so > let's have FESCo decide:

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #52 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- I have submitted this license for review to the FSF. I think it is extremely unlikely that their opinion will differ from that of Red Hat Legal, but I have no problem being

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(dominik@greysecto

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #50 from Kevin Kofler --- I think the current situation, where we have only a working AAC codec with a complete decoder and whose freeness is undisputed (the FFmpeg one) in RPM Fusion, is just fine, and

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Yaakov Selkowitz changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #48 from Richard Fontana --- (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #16) > According to a link: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694257#20 > on that wiki page, Debian thinks that the

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Richard Fontana changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #46 from Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller --- Anyway, if anyone wants any further legal review or discussion about the finer details of the license here I suggest emailing Tom Callaway and not do it here on

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #45 from Kevin Kofler --- See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Foundations#Freedom . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #44 from Kevin Kofler --- Even the introduction on: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Project_Wiki says: > They are developed in Fedora and produced under a free and open source license > from

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #43 from Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller --- (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #40) > It is a Fedora policy that licenses allowed in Fedora must be free according > to the FSF. > >

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #42 from Kevin Kofler --- Oh, and for the technical issues: (In reply to Wim Taymans from comment #34) > Comment #11: why not have fdk-aac-stripped? > - Looking at freetype, and because the library is

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #41 from Kevin Kofler --- See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ#Freedom -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #40 from Kevin Kofler --- It is a Fedora policy that licenses allowed in Fedora must be free according to the FSF. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main also says: > This list is based on the

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #39 from Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller --- Fedora Legal aka Red Hat legal has reviewed this license and is fine with it as a free license. What the FSF or some random people at Debian thinks is of very

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #38 from Kevin Kofler --- If the FSF agrees with Debian the license is non-free, then this code is not allowed in Fedora at all, neither as a package nor bundled anywhere else. If the FSF says the license

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #37 from Kevin Kofler --- If Fedora considers the copyright license free, RPM Fusion probably should, too. Please note, however, that Debian thinks that the license is non-free (see comment #16) and that

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #36 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- (In reply to Wim Taymans from comment #34) ... > The fdk-aac-freeworld name isn't acceptable as the package is considered > nonfree, > the name should be fdk-aac-nonfree

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #35 from leigh scott --- (In reply to Wim Taymans from comment #34) > What I propose is this: > > - Have fdk-aac be the default stipped version of the aac codec that we > include > in Fedora. The

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #34 from Wim Taymans --- After some more thinking I think we need to try to achieve: 1) Be practical about what we can support and allow for tradeoffs between desired and allowed functionality. 2) Keep

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #33 from Wim Taymans --- I was thinking that we don't fork the GStreamer plugin but let it decide what caps to advertise and support based on the fdk-aac implementation (we could ask it to parse a config

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #32 from Olivier Crête --- From the GStremer point of view, doing what Christian wants is easy, the steps that need to happen are: 1. Import aacparse to recognize the HE-AAC profiles that the cut down

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #31 from Kevin Kofler --- Out there in the real world, no serious user uses Fedora without the codecs from RPM Fusion. (Well, maybe some do now that at least MP3 can be shipped in Fedora, but still.) It is

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #30 from Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller --- What is in Fedora is what we ship in Fedora repositories or at the very least allowed to include as a 3rd party repository, what might exist in other

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #29 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Christian, supporting HE-AAC encoding is the raison d'être of fdk-aac. Otherwise FFmpeg's aac codec is good enough for all other use cases. We already have

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #27 from Olivier Crête --- Maybe we can just give it a different soname and then have the GStreamer plugin register under a different name "fdk-aac-mini" that will only claim to accept the profiles that

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #26 from David Vásquez --- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #25) > So, I am actually rejecting this review request on the grounds that it > doesn't work as advertised

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review?

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #24 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Created attachment 1338931 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1338931=edit Reference HE-AAC file decoded with FFmpeg's aac decoder -- You are

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #23 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Created attachment 1338930 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1338930=edit Reference HE-AAC file decoded with fdk-aac-stripped -- You are

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #22 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Ok, I tested ffmpeg-3.3.4 compiled against this stripped library and I don't think it's a good idea to have this in Fedora at all. Playback of the reference

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #21 from Kevin Kofler --- > There would need to be an update to the fdk-aac in rpmfusion to replace this > -free package instead of causing a conflict. Whoever is going to take care of it should take a

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Olivier Crête changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #19 from David Vásquez --- (In reply to Wim Taymans from comment #18) > I'm thinking of naming the package fdk-aac-free. There would need to be an > update to the fdk-aac in rpmfusion to replace this

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Wim Taymans changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wtaym...@redhat.com

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #17 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- FWIW abipkgdiff claims fdk-aac and fdk-aac-stripped are binary-compatible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Kofler --- According to a link: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694257#20 on that wiki page, Debian thinks that the following clause is non-free and GPL-incompatible: > You

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #15 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- After some reading (wiki.hydrogenaud.io/index.php?title=Fraunhofer_FDK_AAC) and closer look at the diff between this and original source, I'm afraid important

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Kofler --- > Or just epoch the stripped package. I assume you mean the unstripped one? But replacing Fedora packages that way is against RPM Fusion policy, the user must opt in to every

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #13 from David Vásquez --- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #12) > (In reply to David Vásquez from comment #9) > > fdk-aac in official is great! but if the stripped version

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #12 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- (In reply to David Vásquez from comment #9) > fdk-aac in official is great! but if the stripped version disable important > functionalities then a

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #11 from leigh scott --- (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #8) > Looks like we need an fdk-aac-freeworld. In fact why do we? I believe the fedora fdk-aac package should be renamed to

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #10 from leigh scott --- (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #8) > Looks like we need an fdk-aac-freeworld. Or just epoch the stripped package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 David Vásquez changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler --- Looks like we need an fdk-aac-freeworld. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and

  1   2   >