[Bug 1540073] Review Request: nss_nis - Name Service Switch (NSS) module using NIS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073 Petr Kubat changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Bug 1540073] Review Request: nss_nis - Name Service Switch (NSS) module using NIS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073 --- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nss_nis -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You

[Bug 1540073] Review Request: nss_nis - Name Service Switch (NSS) module using NIS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073 Petr Kubat changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ---

[Bug 1540073] Review Request: nss_nis - Name Service Switch (NSS) module using NIS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073 --- Comment #8 from Petr Kubat --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]:

[Bug 1540073] Review Request: nss_nis - Name Service Switch (NSS) module using NIS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073 --- Comment #7 from Petr Kubat --- (In reply to Matej Mužila from comment #6) > The packaged version is 3.0 already. As long as I know, there is no more > recent version yet. Now that I am looking at the contents of the

[Bug 1540073] Review Request: nss_nis - Name Service Switch (NSS) module using NIS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073 Matej Mužila changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(mmuz...@redhat.co |

[Bug 1540073] Review Request: nss_nis - Name Service Switch (NSS) module using NIS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073 Petr Kubat changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|

[Bug 1540073] Review Request: nss_nis - Name Service Switch (NSS) module using NIS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073 --- Comment #4 from Petr Kubat --- >I think we absolutely should keep the name for the binary RPM. After thinking about it a bit more I agree with keeping the name of the package as nss_nis. Changing it to libnss_nis would

[Bug 1540073] Review Request: nss_nis - Name Service Switch (NSS) module using NIS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073 --- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Matej Mužila from comment #2) > this package replaces the nss_nis package, previously a subpackage of glibc. > I think, it would be better to stay with the name

[Bug 1540073] Review Request: nss_nis - Name Service Switch (NSS) module using NIS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073 Matej Mužila changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(mmuz...@redhat.co |

[Bug 1540073] Review Request: nss_nis - Name Service Switch (NSS) module using NIS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073 Petr Kubat changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmuz...@redhat.com

[Bug 1540073] Review Request: nss_nis - Name Service Switch (NSS) module using NIS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073 Petr Kubat changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? --

[Bug 1540073] Review Request: nss_nis - Name Service Switch (NSS) module using NIS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073 Petr Kubat changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1540073] Review Request: nss_nis - Name Service Switch (NSS) module using NIS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1537258