https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
Bug 1545479 depends on bug 1666836, which changed state.
Bug 1666836 Summary: Review Request: rocminfo - ROCm system info utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666836
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #24 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hcc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
Tom Stellard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: hcc-|Review Request: hcc -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #22 from Tom Stellard ---
(In reply to Felix Schwarz from comment #17)
> Two more things: Tom, some of your SRPM URLs are 404.
>
Yes, COPR cleans up the older builds after a certain amount of time.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #21 from Tom Stellard ---
(In reply to Felix Schwarz from comment #16)
> (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #14)
> > - %{_includedir}/* in %files
> >
> > Includes should go to a devel package
> >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #20 from Tom Stellard ---
SPEC URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/tstellar/rocm-2.0/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00870303-hcc/hcc.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #19 from Tom Stellard ---
(In reply to Felix Schwarz from comment #17)
> Two more things: Tom, some of your SRPM URLs are 404.
>
> Also in your last revision of the spec file you added "libunwind-devel" with
> no other changes.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #18 from Tom Stellard ---
(In reply to Felix Schwarz from comment #16)
> (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #14)
> > - %{_includedir}/* in %files
> >
> > Includes should go to a devel package
> >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #17 from Felix Schwarz ---
Two more things: Tom, some of your SRPM URLs are 404.
Also in your last revision of the spec file you added "libunwind-devel" with no
other changes. Would you mind commenting why you did that?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #16 from Felix Schwarz ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #14)
> - %{_includedir}/* in %files
>
> Includes should go to a devel package
>
> %{_libdir}/cmake/hcc/ too.
Not sure if I understood you correctly but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #15 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
This takes forever to compile.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #14 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
%if 0%{?__isa_bits} == 64
%global build_libdir lib64/
%else
%global build_libdir lib/
%endif
- Why not use %{_lib}? It resolves to either lib or lib64 depending on the
arch.
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #13 from Tom Stellard ---
SPEC URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/tstellar/rocm-2.0/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00863201-hcc/hcc.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #12 from Tom Stellard ---
SPEC URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/tstellar/rocm-2.0/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00862882-hcc/hcc.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #11 from Felix Schwarz ---
I'm mostly done with the review (still hoping that someone more experienced
will join here :-). Some questions+bikeshedding and one bigger issue.
Let's start with the most important one:
.so files in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #10 from Tom Stellard ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/tstellar/rocm-2.0/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00857850-hcc/hcc.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #9 from Felix Schwarz ---
Hi Tom, fixing all the small issues I brought up (I had hoped someone more
experienced than me would have reviewed the package by now).
I'm still hesitant to formally reviewing this package but I think I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #8 from Tom Stellard ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/tstellar/rocm-2.0/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00849663-hcc/hcc.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
Tom Stellard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1668010
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #7 from Felix Schwarz ---
I rebuilt your updated hcc package on Fedora 29 which worked fine. The
resulting "hcc" binary seems to work. I was able to run "saxpy" and several
example programs from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
Tom Stellard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1666836
--- Comment #6 from Tom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #5 from Tom Stellard ---
(In reply to Felix Schwarz from comment #4)
> > I'm not going to push a ROCm 1.6 version of hcc into Fedora. I have updated
> > the spec file locally to ROCm 1.7, but I would need to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #4 from Felix Schwarz ---
> I'm not going to push a ROCm 1.6 version of hcc into Fedora. I have updated
> the spec file locally to ROCm 1.7, but I would need to update rocm-runtime and
> libhsakmt in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #3 from Tom Stellard ---
I'm not going to push a ROCm 1.6 version of hcc into Fedora. I have updated
the spec file locally to ROCm 1.7, but I would need to update rocm-runtime and
libhsakmt in Fedora to ROCm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #2 from Felix Schwarz ---
Just a random note: Do you plan to update the spec to the latest HCC
version/roc 1.7/1.8 in this review request or would you like to do that after
the package got reviewed?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
28 matches
Mail list logo