https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System ---
libfullock-1.0.36-1.el8.1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System ---
libfullock-1.0.36-1.el8.1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Update
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-7ebd6d0199 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-7ebd6d0199
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System ---
libfullock-1.0.36-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
libfullock-1.0.36-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
libfullock-1.0.36-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
libfullock-1.0.36-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
libfullock-1.0.36-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-ac6ef059e8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
libfullock-1.0.36-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-cb0ba17f5e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #27 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #26 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #25 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libfullock
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Blocks|177841 (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #24 from Hiro Wakabayashi ---
Hi, Robert-André Mauchin
I see. Anyway, Thank you very much for your review!
Hirotaka Wakabayashi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #22 from Hiro Wakabayashi ---
Hello, Robert-André Mauchin
I sincerely appreciate your immediate review!
The upstream developer, Takeshi Nakatani has released a new version that fixed
the bugs you have pointed out in #21.
I have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #21 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- BuildRoot: and Prefix: are not needed
- Do you really reed to redefine all macros?
- Patch the obsolete m4 macro: replace AC_PROG_LIBTOOL with LT_INIT and send
the patch upstream if possible
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #20 from Hiro Wakabayashi ---
Hello, Robert-André Mauchin
I really appreciate your help!
The upstream developer, Takeshi Nakatani is so helpful to fix bugs you have
pointed out. Please review them.
Here are fixed and successful
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #19 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
libfullock.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.27 ['1.0.27-1.fc27',
'1.0.27-1']
→ You need to add the release info in the %changelog too:
* Tue May 15 2018 Takeshi Nakatani1.0.27-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #18 from Hiro Wakabayashi ---
I have a question. I found warnings in rpmlint in my self-review. Would this be
a problem that can be a blocker? I think some warnings can be fixed.
```[vagrant@localhost ~]$ sudo rpmlint
/home/vagra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #17 from Hiro Wakabayashi ---
Hello Iwicki and reviewers,
I have fixed some issues. Any comments are welcome!
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hiwkby/fullock/master/buildutils/libfullock.spec
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #16 from Hiro Wakabayashi ---
>
https://github.com/hiwkby/fullock/blob/master/buildutils/libfullock.spec
Please wait a moment! because I found no %license macro in the new spec file in
my self-review. I must fix it.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #15 from Hiro Wakabayashi ---
Hello Iwicki and reviewers,
Here is my successful build on Koji.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=27151088
Thanks in advance.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #14 from Hiro Wakabayashi ---
Hello Iwicki and reviewers,
Please review my spec file and src.rpm again I have updated today!
I removed comments and the BuildRoot which should not be used in the guideline.
https://github.com/hiwkb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #13 from Hiro Wakabayashi ---
Hello Iwicki, Please check the new spec and src.rpm again!
https://github.com/hiwkby/fullock/blob/master/buildutils/libfullock.spec
https://github.com/hiwkby/fullock/blob/master/libfullock-1.0.27-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #12 from Hiro Wakabayashi ---
Hello Iwicki, Thanks for your reply!
I understand my situation. I will keep this ticket as it is.
Thanks in advance.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #11 from Iwicki Artur ---
There's no need to close and re-submit the ticket. We've had some Review
Requests going on for over a year. ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #10 from Hiro Wakabayashi ---
Hello Iwicki, I am sorry for waiting!
Should I close this ticket once and re-submit a new ticket after fixing the
current problem and releasing a new FULLOCK version if I would have had to
wait for on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #9 from Hiro Wakabayashi ---
Hello Iwicki, Thanks a lot for your quick response and a nice suggestion!
Please wait a moment once again! I discussed about it with the upstream
developer yesterday again. He is so cooperative that he
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #8 from Iwicki Artur ---
You could just put the workaround from Comment #6 into a .patch file, and add
it to the spec as "Patch0: some-descriptive-name.patch". You'll probably need
to add "-p1" to %autosetup as well.
--
You are r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #7 from Hiro Wakabayashi ---
Hello, Iwicki
I would like to ask you to continue this review as it is if it is not a big
problem because upstream currently declined my idea for a reasonable reason.
I discussed about my idea with th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #6 from Hiro Wakabayashi ---
Hello, Iwicki
I found a workaround but I need to ask upstream to accept code change. Please
wait a moment.
I know it's not friendly for packagers to use a comment in the spec file to
show where the so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #5 from Hiro Wakabayashi ---
(In reply to Iwicki Artur from comment #3)
> >Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
> Use the following: "%{URL}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz"
Hello, Iwicki
Thanks you for your quick res
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #4 from Hiro Wakabayashi ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
> Hello and welcome,
>
>
> I can't sponsor, but a couple preliminary remarks:
>
> - %clean is rot needed
>
> %clean
> rm -rf %{buildroot}
>
> -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
Iwicki Artur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
--- Comment #1 from Hiro Wakabayashi ---
Here is a link to a successful Copr build.
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hiwkby/libfullock/build/735310/
Thanks in advance.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
Hiro Wakabayashi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Reference
41 matches
Mail list logo