https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1524656
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
libocxl-1.0.0-0.1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-80a761dd88
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #17 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libocxl
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
Michel Normand changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Package Review: libocxl |Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #16 from Michel Normand ---
scratch build on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26291946
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #14 from Michel Normand ---
OK I moved man in *devel rpm and kept html in *docs rpm
I did not change the Source0 to ease compare with previous URL line and allow
direct access from either vi or emacs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #13 from Dan Horák ---
If the content of the man pages and html file is the same, then I would merge
the man pages into the devel subpackage (where usually basic API documentation
goes, I mean headers + man pages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #12 from Michel Normand ---
(In reply to Michel Normand from comment #11)
> I updated the spec file for your previous comments
> except the man pages and html ones both generated by doxygen,
> so kept
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #11 from Michel Normand ---
I updated the spec file for your previous comments
except the man pages and html ones both generated by doxygen,
so kept them both in the noarch package.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #10 from Dan Horák ---
- the Release tag value should be 0.1 as the 1.0.0 version is in beta (see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Versioning#Prerelease_versions)
- I would put the man pages to -devel, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #9 from Michel Normand ---
done
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #8 from Dan Horák ---
If we won't plan to include libocxl to F-27 (and I think it's not necessary,
F-28+ should be good), then you can remove the ldconfig scriptlets.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #7 from Michel Normand ---
spec and srpm updated from Robert-Andre's review
spec: https://michelmno.fedorapeople.org/libocxl/libocxl.spec
srpm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #6 from Dan Horák ---
Just add "BuildArch: noarch" into the "%package docs" section.
I agree with Robert-Andre's review, but you should be able to drop the
"ldconfig" stuff completely as standard stuff is handled
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #5 from Michel Normand ---
(In reply to Michel Normand from comment #4)
>
> Thank your for all comments;
> Question: how to define in spec the *-docs subpackage as noarch package ?
> while other
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #4 from Michel Normand ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3)
> [CUT] ...
> Actually since it seems to be documentation, I believe it should be
> installed in %{_pkgdocdir} (i.e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Please add a comment for each patch explaining what they do
- Use the new %ldconfig_scriptlets macro instead of:
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1523862
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
Michel Normand changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
25 matches
Mail list logo