https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
Julio Gonzalez Gil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System ---
s3fs-fuse-1.84-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
s3fs-fuse-1.84-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
s3fs-fuse-1.84-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
s3fs-fuse-1.84-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
s3fs-fuse-1.84-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-9ad5351ee5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
s3fs-fuse-1.84-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c6b8690956
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
s3fs-fuse-1.84-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e986513c51
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #27 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #26 from Julio Gonzalez Gil ---
Packages ready at the repository, and built at Koji succesfully.
Last remaining thing is submission to Bodhi and approval from testing to
release, which I will complete after I can get it to work
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #25 from Jason Tibbitts ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/s3fs-fuse
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #24 from Julio Gonzalez Gil ---
Done, for current Fedora and EPEL7, as discussed before.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #23 from Neal Gompa ---
You may also want to request branches too, since you've only requested the
"master" branch with that request (aka, only rawhide).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #22 from Julio Gonzalez Gil ---
Repository requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8355
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #16 from Julio Gonzalez Gil ---
SPEC:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/juliogonzalez/s3fs-fuse/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00802348-s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #18 from Neal Gompa ---
> At CentOS I can see pkgconfig is a dependency for rpm-build, as well as at
> Amazon Linux 2017.03, but not for example at openSUSE Leap 42.3, and maybe
> not at other RPM based distribution.
It's a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #11 from Neal Gompa ---
> BuildRequires: fuse-devel >= 2.8.4
Please use "pkgconfig(fuse) >= 2.8.4"
> BuildRequires: libxml2-devel
Please use "pkgconfig(libxml-2.0)"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #13 from Julio Gonzalez Gil ---
Done. I also added pkgconfig as requirement (it was on my instructions but not
on the SPEC)
SPEC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #21 from Neal Gompa ---
Congratulations, you are now sponsored as a Fedora packager. You may proceed to
request your package git repo. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #20 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #19 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #17 from Julio Gonzalez Gil ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #14)
> > BuildRequires: pkgconfig
>
> This doesn't hurt anything, but strictly speaking, isn't required, since
> every devel package that generates a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #15 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #14 from Neal Gompa ---
> BuildRequires: pkgconfig
This doesn't hurt anything, but strictly speaking, isn't required, since every
devel package that generates a pkgconfig() dep also generates a
/usr/bin/pkg-config Requires.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa ---
> Source0:
> https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/archive/v%{version}.tar.gz
Please use the following form:
https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #10 from Julio Gonzalez Gil ---
Good!
I added all your suggestions (this submission is a great way of learning some
workarounds), and the comment about CentOS6/RHEL6.
SPEC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #9 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Julio Gonzalez Gil from comment #8)
>
> I will add a comment with a brief explanation and a link to the GitHub
> issue. Is this OK?
That is fine. Just remember you should not request an el6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #8 from Julio Gonzalez Gil ---
> Did you check to see if fuse 2.8.3 would work? I looked at the commit that
> changed it to 2.8.4[1], and I don't see anything in it that indicates it was
> changed in such a way that 2.8.3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgalle...@redhat.com
--- Comment #7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Julio Gonzalez Gil from comment #4)
>
> > Requires:fuse-libs >= 2.8.4
> > BuildRequires: fuse-devel >= 2.8.4
>
> Fuse is required according to the s3fs-fuse README at least for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Julio Gonzalez Gil from comment #4)
> SPEC:
> https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/juliogonzalez/s3fs-fuse/
> fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00801776-s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse.spec (committed the
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #4 from Julio Gonzalez Gil ---
SPEC:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/juliogonzalez/s3fs-fuse/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00801776-s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse.spec
(committed the original git repo:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #3 from Julio Gonzalez Gil ---
Thanks!
I'll take care of everything tomorrow. Most of the stuff is just inherited from
the original SPEC submitted at 725292, so I think I can just change most of the
stuff as required.
About:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Spec review:
> Release:%{_release_simple}%{?dist}
You should just put the number in. That is, it should be "2%{?dist}".
Strictly speaking, it's not required to change this, and if you have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631988
Julio Gonzalez Gil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: s3-fuse - |Review Request: s3fs-fuse -
38 matches
Mail list logo
