https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
fctxpd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
fctxpd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
fctxpd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-513373fe60 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-513373fe60
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
fctxpd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-b998644b53 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-b998644b53
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
fctxpd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #18 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #17 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #16 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) ---
This was the mistake which i did while creating the upstream name and the
original package name(fc_txptd).
It should be fctxpd.
Sorry for the mistake.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #15 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) ---
Is the missing second "t" on purpose?
>>Yes
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #13 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) ---
THis is the change i did.
rename from fc_txptd.spec to fctxpd.spec
and in spec file i made the below change
-Name: fc_txptd
+Name: fctxpd
Version:0.1
Release:1.%{snapshotdate}
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #12 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) ---
Hi Robert,
Updated the spec and SRPM as the package name and the spec file does not match.
I have made the changes and build the package for few distributions.
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
--- Comment #11 from P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fctxpd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: fctxpd- |Review Request: fctxpd -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Blocks|177841 (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #7 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #6)
> Yes, COPR is fine.
>
> - Builds failed for me because the archive downloaded has a different root
> folder, so the folder should be changed in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Yes, COPR is fine.
- Builds failed for me because the archive downloaded has a different root
folder, so the folder should be changed in autosetup:
%prep
%autosetup -n bsn-fc-txptd-%{commit}
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #5 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #4)
> - %global _sysdir usr/lib is not needed anymore
>
> - please separate your %changelog entries by a newline
>
> - the archive seems corrupt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- %global _sysdir usr/lib is not needed anymore
- please separate your %changelog entries by a newline
- the archive seems corrupted, please check the Source URL. Also if you
package the "mas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #3 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) ---
Hi All,
I have addressed the review comments and the details of SPEC and SRPM are
available in the below path.
Spec URL:
https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/blob/master/SPEC/fc_txptd.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #2 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> make %{?_smp_mflags} → %make_build
>
> make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} → %make_install
>
> - License seems to be MIT in the headers:
> https
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Refer
28 matches
Mail list logo
