[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- python-dateparser-0.7.4-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- python-dateparser-0.7.4-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-03-16 20:38:11 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- python-dateparser-0.7.4-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- python-dateparser-0.7.4-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-fcb66f97ea -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- python-dateparser-0.7.4-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-08db6c1706 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- python-dateparser-0.7.4-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-23600140c6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-08db6c1706 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-08db6c1706 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-fcb66f97ea has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-fcb66f97ea -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-23600140c6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-23600140c6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 --- Comment #15 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com |zebo...@gmail.com
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Fix changelog entry
warning: bogus date in %changelog: Thu Nov 19 2019 Fabian Affolter
- 0.7.2-4
- Bump to 0.7.4 and activate tests (they pass)
Package approved. Please fix the aforementioned issue before import.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
License", "*No copyright* BSD (unspecified)". 676 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/python-dateparser/review-python-
dateparser/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 Artem changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1805765 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805765 [Bug 1805765] Review Request: komikku - Online/offline manga reader for GNOME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter --- Jared, could be take a look again? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for your comment. * Thu Nov 19 2019 Fabian Affolter - 0.7.2-4 - Fix license tag (rhbz#1748956) Update files: Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-dateparser.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-dateparser-0.7.2-4.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 --- Comment #11 from Jared Smith --- Package Review == * License for the code is BSD (3-clause), but the spec file states MIT Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/dateparser(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dateparser-0.7.2-py3.8.egg-info(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/dateparser/__pycache__(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dateparser/calendars(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/dateparser/calendars/__pycache__(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dateparser/data(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/dateparser/data/__pycache__(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/dateparser/data/date_translation_data(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/dateparser/data/date_translation_data/__pycache__(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/dateparser/data/numeral_translation_data(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/dateparser/data/numeral_translation_data/__pycache__(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/dateparser/languages(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/dateparser/languages/__pycache__(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/dateparser/search(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dateparser/search/__pycache__(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/dateparser/utils(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dateparser/utils/__pycache__(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/dateparser_data(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dateparser_data/__pycache__(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/share/doc/python3-dateparser(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/share/licenses/python3-dateparser(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/share/doc/python-dateparser-doc(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/share/doc/python- dateparser-doc/html(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/share/doc/python-dateparser-doc/html/_modules(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/share/doc/python-dateparser- doc/html/_modules/dateparser(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/share/doc/python-dateparser- doc/html/_modules/dateparser/languages(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/share/doc/python-dateparser-doc/html/_sources(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,), /usr/share/doc/python- dateparser-doc/html/_static(to, defaulting, set, C, Failed, locale,) [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter --- I disabled the test for now till upstream merge the changes. * Mon Nov 18 2019 Fabian Affolter - 0.7.2-3 - Disable tests * Mon Nov 18 2019 Fabian Affolter - 0.7.2-2 - Fix BRs Update files: Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-dateparser.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-dateparser-0.7.2-3.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 --- Comment #9 from Jared Smith --- Uh, please double-check that link... it built the SRPM, but wasn't able to finish building the resulting binary RPMs. For example, here's the build log showing the failure: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=39086970=DEFAULT=build.log=-4000 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter --- No, it's not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter --- Hmmm, scratch build works. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39086905 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956
--- Comment #6 from Jared Smith ---
There appears to be a problem running the checks when trying to rebuild the
SRPM in mock (configured for rawhide):
Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.oQhrEv
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd dateparser-0.7.2
+
PYTHONPATH=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-dateparser-0.7.2-1.fc32.x86_64//usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages
+ pytest-3.8 tests
= test session starts
==
platform linux -- Python 3.8.0, pytest-4.6.6, py-1.8.0, pluggy-0.12.0
rootdir: /builddir/build/BUILD/dateparser-0.7.2
collected 21838 items / 4 errors / 21834 selected
ERRORS
_ ERROR collecting tests/test_date.py
__
ImportError while importing test module
'/builddir/build/BUILD/dateparser-0.7.2/tests/test_date.py'.
Hint: make sure your test modules/packages have valid Python names.
Traceback:
tests/test_date.py:9: in
from mock import Mock, patch
E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'mock'
__ ERROR collecting tests/test_date_parser.py
__
ImportError while importing test module
'/builddir/build/BUILD/dateparser-0.7.2/tests/test_date_parser.py'.
Hint: make sure your test modules/packages have valid Python names.
Traceback:
tests/test_date_parser.py:8: in
from mock import patch, Mock
E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'mock'
_ ERROR collecting tests/test_freshness_date_parser.py
_
ImportError while importing test module
'/builddir/build/BUILD/dateparser-0.7.2/tests/test_freshness_date_parser.py'.
Hint: make sure your test modules/packages have valid Python names.
Traceback:
tests/test_freshness_date_parser.py:10: in
from mock import Mock, patch
E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'mock'
ERROR collecting tests/test_timezone_parser.py
ImportError while importing test module
'/builddir/build/BUILD/dateparser-0.7.2/tests/test_timezone_parser.py'.
Hint: make sure your test modules/packages have valid Python names.
Traceback:
tests/test_timezone_parser.py:5: in
from mock import Mock, patch
E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'mock'
=== warnings summary
===
tests/test_languages.py:2104
/builddir/build/BUILD/dateparser-0.7.2/tests/test_languages.py:2104:
DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \d
{'simplifications': [{'(\d+)\s*hr(s?)\g<(.+?)>': r'\1 hour\2'}]},
tests/test_loading.py:104
/builddir/build/BUILD/dateparser-0.7.2/tests/test_loading.py:104:
DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \(
UNKNOWN_LANGUAGES_EXCEPTION_RE = re.compile("Unknown language\(s\): (.+)")
tests/test_loading.py:105
/builddir/build/BUILD/dateparser-0.7.2/tests/test_loading.py:105:
DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \(
UNKNOWN_LOCALES_EXCEPTION_RE = re.compile("Unknown locale\(s\): (.+)")
tests/test_settings.py:28
/builddir/build/BUILD/dateparser-0.7.2/tests/test_settings.py:28:
DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \+
param('12 Feb 2015 10:30 PM +0100', datetime(2015, 2, 12, 22, 30),
'UTC\+01:00'),
tests/test_settings.py:132
/builddir/build/BUILD/dateparser-0.7.2/tests/test_settings.py:132:
DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \}
with self.assertRaisesRegexp(TypeError, 'Invalid.*None\}'):
tests/test_settings.py:135
/builddir/build/BUILD/dateparser-0.7.2/tests/test_settings.py:135:
DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \}
with self.assertRaisesRegexp(TypeError, 'Invalid.*None\}'):
tests/test_settings.py:138
/builddir/build/BUILD/dateparser-0.7.2/tests/test_settings.py:138:
DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \}
with self.assertRaisesRegexp(TypeError, 'Invalid.*None\}'):
tests/test_utils.py:64
/builddir/build/BUILD/dateparser-0.7.2/tests/test_utils.py:64:
DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \+
param(datetime(2015, 12, 12), timezone='UTC+3', zone='UTC\+03:00'),
-- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/warnings.html
!!! Interrupted: 4 errors during collection
= 8 warnings, 4 error in 5.54 seconds
==
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.oQhrEv (%check)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.oQhrEv (%check)
Finish: rpmbuild python-dateparser-0.7.2-1.fc30.src.rpm
Finish: build phase for python-dateparser-0.7.2-1.fc30.src.rpm
ERROR: Exception(python-dateparser-0.7.2-1.fc30.src.rpm)
Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 0 minutes 39 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result
ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 86f6809f109c4dbbb610bdb8658c28bf -D
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1773382 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773382 [Bug 1773382] Review Request: home-assistant-cli - Command-line tool for Home Assistant -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter --- * Thu Oct 17 2019 Fabian Affolter - 0.7.2-1 - Update to latest upstream release 0.7.2 Updated files: Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-dateparser.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-dateparser-0.7.2-1.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1749062 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749062 [Bug 1749062] python-arrow-0.15.2 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ke...@scrye.com --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi --- This is needed now for tests of the new version of python-arrow. ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC|projects...@smart.ms| Assignee|projects...@smart.ms|nob...@fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||FTBFS --- Comment #3 from Raphael Groner --- FTBFS Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37674068 sphinx-build -b html -d _build/doctrees . _build/html Running Sphinx v2.1.2 BUILDSTDERR: Configuration error: BUILDSTDERR: There is a programmable error in your configuration file: BUILDSTDERR: Traceback (most recent call last): BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/sphinx/config.py", line 361, in eval_config_file BUILDSTDERR: execfile_(filename, namespace) BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/sphinx/util/pycompat.py", line 86, in execfile_ BUILDSTDERR: exec(code, _globals) BUILDSTDERR: File "/builddir/build/BUILD/dateparser-0.7.1/docs/conf.py", line 34, in BUILDSTDERR: import dateparser BUILDSTDERR: File "/builddir/build/BUILD/dateparser-0.7.1/dateparser/__init__.py", line 4, in BUILDSTDERR: from .date import DateDataParser BUILDSTDERR: File "/builddir/build/BUILD/dateparser-0.7.1/dateparser/date.py", line 11, in BUILDSTDERR: from dateutil.relativedelta import relativedelta BUILDSTDERR: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'dateutil' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 --- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner --- Review swap maybe with bug #1709037. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||projects...@smart.ms Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|projects...@smart.ms --- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner --- Are you interested in a review swap? Maybe take a look into bug #1752210. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 Bug 1748956 depends on bug 1748938, which changed state. Bug 1748938 Summary: Review Request: python-convertdate - A Python module to convert date formats and calculating holidays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748938 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1748938 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748938 [Bug 1748938] Review Request: python-convertdate - A Python module to convert date formats and calculating holidays -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
