https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #32 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #31 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #30 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/avocado-vt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #28 from lnie ---
Hi Robert,
Here is the new links:
SRPM:https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/lnie/avocado-vt/fedora-31-x86_64/01321495-avocado-vt/avocado-vt-77.0-1.fc31.src.rpm
SPEC:https://download.copr.fedorainfrac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #27 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
OK, still need to own these dirs thingie.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #26 from lnie ---
Hi Robert,
We see conflicting requests problem because default avocado stream is banned
on 32 and rawhide.
I have checked,we will be able to install avocado-vt package successfully on
Rawhide if we do "dnf mo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #25 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package is not installable:
DEBUG util.py:600: Error:
DEBUG util.py:600: Problem: conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:600:- nothing provides python3.8dist(aexpect) needed by
python3-avocado
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #24 from lnie ---
Hi Robert,
Thanks a lot for your review,and here are the new links:
SRPM:https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/lnie/avocado-vt/fedora-31-x86_64/01315215-avocado-vt/avocado-vt-77.0-1.fc31.src.rpm
SPEC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #22 from lnie ---
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your very helpful information and reply.I have ran 'fedora-review'
on avocado-vt,and made some modifications accordingly,there are only two
warning messages complaining virt spelling-error,w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #21 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
I would suggest reading back over all the comments in this bug to ensure
that everything mentioned has been fixed. Then run the 'fedora-review'
program yourself on the package, as that will find oth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #20 from lnie ---
Hi Richard,
I really feel very sorry for having made you and seeing you quit this review
process.
If I may,would you please give me some time and tell me where the multiple
issues are?
I will work on them,and upl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rjo...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #18 from lnie ---
Hi,
Sorry for the so long delay.Cleber agrees that the top-level requires should
be moved to subpackage.I have moved them there and cleaned up a bit,and here
is the new build:
SRPM:https://download.copr.fedorai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #17 from Miro Hrončok ---
(In reply to lnie from comment #15)
> Could we leave the top-level requires there?
No. They are broken. You question mostly could be translated as: Could we have
a broken package approved?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #16 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Well, no, the purpose of review is to review and fix all these things. Let's
see what
Cleber says.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #15 from lnie ---
Hi,
I have sent an email to Cleber last Wednesday,but hasn't received any
reply,maybe he is too busy to handle this thing?
Could we leave the top-level requires there?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
I didn't spot that the Requires lines in fact have no effect because they apply
to the non-existent main package, but that just makes them even more
suspicious.
They must have been added for a reason
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #13 from lnie ---
Hi Miro,
Got it and thanks,I will upload a new package accordingly after I get new
feedback from Richard.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #12 from Miro Hrončok ---
Thanks. You can do option 3. in the meantime, but open an upstream discussion
about options 1/2.
I've noticed onw more thing. There is no "main package", only the python3-
subpackage.
The top-level requ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #11 from lnie ---
Hi Miro,
Thanks for your review,I have modified the spec file accordingly except the
shebang thing,
as I think I may need ask help from the upstream maintainer about that.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #10 from lnie ---
(In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #8)
> Could you upload a new package with at least the things that you can
> fix from comment 5 and comment 6 fixed?
Hi Richard,
Sure,here is the link:
SRPM:http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
--- Comment #9 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Could you upload a new package with at least the things that you can
fix from comment 5 and comment 6 fixed?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
lnie changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(l...@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #7 from lnie ---
Hi Richard,
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(l...@redhat.com)
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Don't bother to do an update until I post the full review, but there are still
a
few small things to fix:
(1) %dir /%{_sysconfdir}/avocado and %dir /%{_sysconfdir}/avocado/conf.d
You don't need the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
lnie changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(l...@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #4 from lnie ---
Hi Richard,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(l...@redhat.com)
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rjo...@redhat.com
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
--- Comment #1 from lnie ---
Hi my sponsor,
Really thanks for your time on reviewing this request.I have rebuilt the
package as there is a new release in upstream,and here is the links:
Spec
URL:https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467
lnie changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|rawhide |31
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
36 matches
Mail list logo
