[Bug 1776150] Review Request: ghc-either - Combinators for working with sums

2020-02-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776150

Jens Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|ghc-either-5.0.1.1-4.fc32   |ghc-either-5.0.1.1-4.fc31
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed|2019-11-27 14:22:50 |2020-02-17 08:38:10



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1776150] Review Request: ghc-either - Combinators for working with sums

2020-02-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776150



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-either-5.0.1.1-4.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1776150] Review Request: ghc-either - Combinators for working with sums

2020-01-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776150

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-either-5.0.1.1-4.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f3614f8dab

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1776150] Review Request: ghc-either - Combinators for working with sums

2020-01-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776150



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-f3614f8dab has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f3614f8dab

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1776150] Review Request: ghc-either - Combinators for working with sums

2019-12-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776150

Jens Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|ghc-either-5.0.1.1-3.fc32   |ghc-either-5.0.1.1-4.fc32



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1776150] Review Request: ghc-either - Combinators for working with sums

2019-12-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776150

Jens Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||ghc-either-5.0.1.1-3.fc32



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1776150] Review Request: ghc-either - Combinators for working with sums

2019-12-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776150



--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-either

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1776150] Review Request: ghc-either - Combinators for working with sums

2019-12-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776150



--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen  ---
Thanks for reviewing, Robert-André

(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #6)
>  - Remove executable bits in %prep and notify upstream about it:
> 
> ghc-either-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
> /usr/share/doc/ghc-either-devel/CHANGELOG.markdown
> ghc-either-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
> /usr/share/doc/ghc-either-devel/README.markdown

I have opened https://github.com/ekmett/either/issues/63
and will fix this when importing, thanks

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/20498

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1776150] Review Request: ghc-either - Combinators for working with sums

2019-12-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776150

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - Remove executable bits in %prep and notify upstream about it:

ghc-either-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/ghc-either-devel/CHANGELOG.markdown
ghc-either-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/ghc-either-devel/README.markdown


Package approved.



==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License",
 "BSD (unspecified)". 8 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-either/review-ghc-
 either/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is 

[Bug 1776150] Review Request: ghc-either - Combinators for working with sums

2019-12-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776150



--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen  ---
Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-either/ghc-either.spec
SRPM:
http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-either/ghc-either-5.0.1.1-2.fc31.src.rpm

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39446955

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1776150] Review Request: ghc-either - Combinators for working with sums

2019-11-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776150

Jens Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords|Reopened|



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1776150] Review Request: ghc-either - Combinators for working with sums

2019-11-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776150

Jens Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |NEW
 Resolution|EOL |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen  ---
oops

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1776150] Review Request: ghc-either - Combinators for working with sums

2019-11-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776150

Ben Cotton  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |EOL
Last Closed||2019-11-27 14:22:50



--- Comment #3 from Ben Cotton  ---
Fedora 29 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2019-11-26. Fedora 29 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1776150] Review Request: ghc-either - Combinators for working with sums

2019-11-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776150

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com



--- Comment #2 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
The doc subpackage is missing the license, I believe.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1776150] Review Request: ghc-either - Combinators for working with sums

2019-11-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776150



--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39313006

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org