https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-cfef250ad5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7f7daa45d7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-6aa8872251 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-fb23acf5d0 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-cfef250ad5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-cfef250
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7f7daa45d7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7f7daa4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-fb23acf5d0 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-6dc849e66d has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-6aa8872251 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6aa8872251
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-6dc849e66d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6dc849e66d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/multiwatch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Lefoul ---
Thanks!
%check was marked as failed because it is not present, which is fine (not a
MUST). The statement "%check is present and all tests pass" is technically
false, that doesn't mean there are tests th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
Benjamin Lefoul changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
--- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot ---
I've updated %%description for the grammar fix you noticed and 'webserver'
rpmlint complains about. Not sure what to do if anything with 'daemontool'.
I'm unsure why you marked %check has failed, there's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
--- Comment #1 from Benjamin Lefoul ---
This is a trivial package. All relevant MUSTs pass (after slightly rewriting
the description).
Note: It was also successfully tested in f31 and epel8 in the sympa solution
proposed here: https://github.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
Benjamin Lefoul changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
Benjamin Lefoul changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@fedoraproject.org
Assi
21 matches
Mail list logo