https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
ycollet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
ycollet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
Resolution|NOTABUG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
ycollet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #24 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Yes, inform me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #23 from ycollet ---
OK. I will certainly try to do a mix: submitting some new spec files and try to
do some review.
When I do a review, I add you to the review ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #22 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Because your spec was not good at start I need to make sure you understand most
significant rules of Fedora packaging guidellines.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
First
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #21 from ycollet ---
I finished reading the wiki page related to sponsoring.
What can I do so as you sponsor me ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #20 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
I can be a sponsor.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #19 from ycollet ---
OK, thanks a lot for your review.
I will now try to find a sponsor.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #18 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Now you need to get sponsored.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Get_Sponsored
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #17 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #16 from ycollet ---
Yes, you're right, c++ was not required. I cleaned up the spec file.
The URL to the last version of the spec file:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #15 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
It is really need gcc-c++ to build? I don't see it in build.log
If not then remove it from BuildRequires.
Source0:
https://gitlab.com/drobilla/lv2lint/-/archive/%{version}/lv2lint-%{version}.tar.gz
can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #14 from ycollet ---
I was waiting for the build to finish on COPR.
The link to the lv2lint spec file on the COPR repo:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #13 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Now post new URLs. It needed to make review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #12 from ycollet ---
Ah, sorry. I thought you where talking about the %buildroot in the build and
install section.
I commit a change ASAP.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #11 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Just use
Spec URL: ...
SRPM URL: ...
As in first message.
And you still not removed BuildRoot string from spec!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #10 from ycollet ---
The link to the lv2lint spec file on the COPR repo:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ycollet/linuxmao/fedora-32-x86_64/01414984-lv2lint/lv2lint.spec
The link to the corresponding src rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #9 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Now please post direct links to updated Spec URL: and SRPM URL:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #8 from ycollet ---
OK, Thanks.
I updated the build / install part. I removed %{set_build_flags} and used
%meson %meson_build and %meson_install.
I replaced the license by Artistic 2.0 and I fixed the %file part by using
%{name}.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #7 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
8. Don't use glob * in %files section such way.
Change paths to something like
%{_bindir}/{name}*
%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1*
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #6 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
7. Change License: field to
Artistic 2.0
Here you can find all allowed licenses and how they must be writed in License:
field
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #5 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
No need patches here put it near your spec file. If you added patch then need
%autosetup -p1
URL should be this
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ycollet/fedora-spec/master/lv2lint/lv2lint.spec
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #4 from ycollet ---
I just fixed the spec file.
I added a patch because of a duplicated symbol problem on Fedora 32.
I don't understand the point 5 ?
In the Review request, I must add the spec file and not give an URL to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #3 from ycollet ---
Created attachment 1692809
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1692809=edit
A requested patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #2 from ycollet ---
Created attachment 1692808
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1692808=edit
The spec file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vasc...@gmail.com
Doc
30 matches
Mail list logo
