https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
--- Comment #16 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Hi Anil,
Yes, that's the current version that I've submitted for review. I'm also
keeping these changes in a fork of your GitHub repo, but it's just easier to
use fedorapeople to host the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
--- Comment #15 from Anil Tuncel ---
Hi Ankur,
Thanks a lot for the change.
This is the spec, right?
https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-bluepyopt/python-bluepyopt.spec
Best
Anil
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
--- Comment #13 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
(In reply to Anil Tuncel from comment #11)
> It is ready on the master branch with this commit d15b9ac.
> Now with `BuildRequires: python3-neuron`, BluePyOpt examples can be run as
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
--- Comment #12 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anilbey/bluepyopt-rpm/master/python-bluepyopt.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
--- Comment #11 from Anil Tuncel ---
It is ready on the master branch with this commit d15b9ac.
Now with `BuildRequires: python3-neuron`, BluePyOpt examples can be run as
expected.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
Bug 1849706 depends on bug 1851120, which changed state.
Bug 1851120 Summary: No package builds for rawhide?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851120
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1851120
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
--- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
(In reply to Anil Tuncel from comment #9)
> Hi Ankur thanks for the info.
>
> comment5
>
> Ok I updated the link.
>
> comment8
>
> I applied the changes here. One of the macros is trying
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
--- Comment #9 from Anil Tuncel ---
Hi Ankur thanks for the info.
comment5
Ok I updated the link.
comment8
I applied the changes here. One of the macros is trying to install everything
listed on setup.py therefore causing this error.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
Anil Tuncel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
--- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Some preliminary comments:
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
^
We'll
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
--- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
I've downloaded the files manually and passed them on to fedora-review for the
initial review.
After each round of comments, you (the package submitter) update the spec/srpm
and post new
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
--- Comment #6 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
The reason is that with this link:
https://github.com/anilbey/bluepyopt-rpm/blob/master/python-bluepyopt-1.9.48-1.fc32.src.rpm
one gets an HTML page, which fedora-review correctly detects as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
--- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
No, the srpm is fine. Only the github link needs to be updated to the "raw"
link, like the one for the Spec:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
--- Comment #4 from Anil Tuncel ---
I built it using the rpmbuild -ba python-bluepyopt.spec command.
What do I need to do to get the raw SRPM?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
--- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Thanks.
We use fedora-review to automate some of the tests/checks. `sudo dnf install
fedora-review`, and https://pagure.io/FedoraReview
I just tried to run fedora-review to get things
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
--- Comment #2 from Anil Tuncel ---
Hi Ankur I have FAS account it seems.
My username is "anilbey".
Best,
Anıl
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706
Anil Tuncel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nob...@fedoraproject.org,
20 matches
Mail list logo
